Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:00:31.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of the Shock-Absorption Performance of a High Capacity Suspension System by Neural Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

Y.-W. Lee
Y.-W. Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechatronic, Energy and Aerospace Engineering, Chung Cheng Institute of Technology, National Defense University, Taoyuan, Taiwan 33448, R.O.C.
*
yaweilee@ ndu.edu.tw
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop a framework using nonlinear autoregressive model process with exogenous inputs (NARX) neural networks (NNs) to identify the dynamic hysteresis of high load capacity suspension systems. Here, a vertical excitation test is used to simulate various terrains at an oscillation frequency range from 0.1Hz to 10Hz by using NARX NNs. The model results are in good agreement with suspension component oscillation responses that manifest as variations in model order selection as the excitation frequency approaches 7Hz. Furthermore, mapping the models into generalized frequency response functions (GFRFs), elucidates any unanticipated couplings between surroundings and mechanical hysteresis within the suspension. The proposed approach's systematic design procedure is advantageous because it provides a cost-efficient method that achieves precise identification of online data.

Keywords

NARX networksDouble wishbone suspensionGeneralized frequency response functions (GFRFs)
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 39 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Smith, M. C. and Gavin, W. W., “Performance Limitations and Constraints for Active and Passive Suspensions: A Mechanical Multi-Port Approach,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 33, pp. 137–168 (2000).Google Scholar
2.Efatpenah, K., Beno, J. H. and Nichols, S. P., “Energy Requirements of a Passive and an Electromechanical Active Suspension System,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 34, pp. 437–458 (2000).Google Scholar
3.Attia, H. A., “Dynamic Modelling of the Double Wishbone Motor-Vehicle Suspension System,” European Journal of Mechanics A Solids, 21, pp. 167–174 (2002).Google Scholar
4.Bian, X. L., Song, B. A. and Walter, R., “Optimization of Steering Linkage and Double-Wishbone Suspension Via R-W Multi-Body Dynamic Analysis,” Forschung Im Ingenieurwesen, 69, pp. 38–43 (2004).Google Scholar
5.Rubio, J. J. and Yu, W., “Stability Analysis of Nonlinear System Identification Via Delayed Neural Networks,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 61, pp. 299–306 (2010).Google Scholar
6.Fridman, E. and Niculescu, S. I., “On Complete Lyapunov-Krasovskii Functional Techniques for Uncertain Systems with Fast-Varying Delays,” International Journal of Robust Nonlinear Control, 18, pp. 364–374 (2007).Google Scholar
7.Xie, W. F., Zhu, Y. Q., Zhao, Z. Y. and Wong, Y. K., “Nonlinear System Identification Using Optimized Dynamic Neural Network,” Neurocomputing, 72, pp. 3277–3287 (2009).Google Scholar
8.Khan, A. A. and Vyas, N. S., “Nonlinear Parameter Estimation Using Volterra and Wiener Theories,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 221, pp. 805–821 (1999).Google Scholar
9.Tawfiq, I. and Vinh, T., “Nonlinear Behaviour of Structures Using the Volterra Series-Signal Processing and Testing Methods,” Nonlinear Dynamics, 37, pp. 129–149 (2004).Google Scholar
10.Arias, M. R., Benítez, R. and Bolós, V. J., “Non-Convolution Nonlinear Integral Volterra Equationswith Monotone Operators,” Communications Mathematical Applied, 50, pp. 1405–1414 (2005).Google Scholar
11.Prazenica, R. J. and Kurdila, A. J., “Multiwavelet Constructions and Volterra Kernel Identification,” Nonlinear Dynamics, 43, pp. 277–310 (2006).Google Scholar
12.Yue, R., Billings, S. A. and Lang, Z. Q., “An Investigation Into the Characteristics of Non-Linear Frequency Response Functions. Part 1: Understanding the Higher Dimensional Frequency Spaces,” International Journal of Control, 78, pp. 1031–1044 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Swain, A. K., Mendes, E. M. A. M. and Nguang, S. K., “Analysis of the Effects of Time Delay in Nonlinear Nonlinear Systems Using Generalised Frequency Response Functions,” Journal of Sound Vibration, 294, pp. 341–354 (2006).Google Scholar
14.Peng, Z. K., Lang, Z. Q., Wolters, C., Billings, S. A. and Worden, K., “Feasibility Study of Structural Damage Detection Using NARMAX Modelling and Nonlinear Output Frequency Response Function Based Analysis,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25, pp. 1045–1061 (2011).Google Scholar
15.Bayma, R. S. and Lang, Z. Q., “New Method for Determining the Generalised Frequency Response Functions of Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, I: Regular Papers, 59, pp. 3005–3014 (2012).Google Scholar
16.Diaconescu, E., “The Use of NARX Neural Networks to Predict Chaotic Time Series,” WSEAS Transactions Computers, 3, pp. 182–191 (2008).Google Scholar
17.Lee, Y. W. and Chang, T. L., “Application of NARX Neural Networks in Thermal Dynamics Identification of a Pulsating Heat Pipe,” Energy Conversion and Management, 50, pp. 1069–1078 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Swiercz, E., “Neural Detection of Parameter Changes in a Dynamic System Using Time-Frequency Transforms,” WIT Transactions on Modelling and Simulation, 48, pp. 271–280 (2009).Google Scholar
19.Fichera, A. and Pagano, A., “Monitoring Combustion Unstable Dynamics by Means of Control Charts,” Applied Energy, 86, pp. 1574–1581 (2009).Google Scholar
20.Song, Q. j. and Chen, H. F., “Non-Parametric Approach to Identifying NARX Systems,” Journal of Systems Sciences Complex, 23, pp. 3–21 (2010).Google Scholar
21.Lee, Y. W., “Study on Energy Transfer Mechanism of a Turbo Charged Diesel Engine,” Journal of the Chinese Society Mechanics English, 29, pp. 179–186 (2008).Google Scholar
22.Tsang, K. M. and Billings, S. A., “Identification of Systems from Non-Uniformly Sampled Data,” International Journal of Systems Sciences, 26, pp. 1823–1837 (1995).Google Scholar
23.Khan, A. A. and Vyas, N. S., “Application of Volterra and Wiener Theories for Nonlinear Parameter Estimation in a Rotor-Bearing System,” Nonlinear Dynamics, 24, pp. 285–304 (2001).Google Scholar
24.Yu, T. H., Sekkat, O., Parera, S. R., Markovic and D. Cabric, D., “A Wideband Spectrum-Sensing Processor with Adaptive Detection Threshold and Sensing Time,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems. I, Regular Papers, 58, pp. 2765–2774 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Han, Y., “Control Strategies for Multilevel Apfs Based on the Windowed-FFT and Resonant Controllers,” Journal of Power Electron, 12, pp. 509–517 (2012).Google Scholar