Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T06:56:53.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stress Analysis of Improper Femur Cut in Total Knee Arthroplasty by Finite Element Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2019

W. L. Su ,
K. D. You ,
C. C. Yang ,
J. J. Wu  and
M. K. Yeh Open the ORCID record for M. K. Yeh [Opens in a new window]
W. L. Su
Affiliation:
Department of Power Mechanical Engineering National Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchu, Taiwan
K. D. You
Affiliation:
Department of Power Mechanical Engineering National Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchu, Taiwan
C. C. Yang
Affiliation:
Chung-Shang Hospital Taipei, Taiwan
J. J. Wu
Affiliation:
Chung-Shang Hospital Taipei, Taiwan
M. K. Yeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Power Mechanical Engineering National Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchu, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Precise bone cut is fundamental in total knee arthroplasty. However, notching of anterior femoral is not uncommon in clinical practice. Reviewing the article, notching and its complication may reach up to 30% and 2.5%, and there is scanty study of notching on the femoral strength. We therefore conduct the finite element analysis to elucidate the effect of notching on femoral mechanical strength. The computerized tomography images were used as the basis to develop the knee model, which was assumed mainly to consist of cortical and cancellous bones. For the implant joint, Zimmer data was considered partly as the basis to develop the model. This study investigated the femoral improper cut effect on the surgery with a static standing condition. The results show that the anterior femoral cut should be undercut 2 mm to overcut 1 mm during the surgery, in order to prevent bone materials from yielding. The exposure of the cancellous bone may cause bone materials to yield when the femur overcut was 2 mm; the cancellous bone may load too much and result in a fracture when the undercut was 3 mm. The effect of undercut, which was rarely discussed, was particularly addressed in our study. Precise femoral cut is crucial for the longevity of total knee arthroplasty.

Keywords

Total Knee ArthroplastyNotchingStress AnalysisFinite Element Method
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 315 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Richmond, J., Hunter, D., Irrgang, J., Jones, M. H., Snyder, M. L., Van, D. D., Rubin, C., Matzkin, E. G., Marx, R. G., Levy, B. A., Watters, W. C., Goldberg, M. J., Keith, M., Haralson, R. H., Turkelson, C. M., Wies, J. L., Anderson, S., Boyer, K., Sluka, P., Andre, J. and McGowan, R., “American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on the treatment of osteoarthritis(OA) of the knee,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American volume, 92(4), pp. 990–993 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD, “Hip and knee replacement,” Health at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris (2017).Google Scholar
Population Reference Bureau, “World Population Data Sheet,” Population Reference Bureau Publishing, Washington, D.C. (2010-2015)Google Scholar
Weinstein, A. M., Rome, B. N., Reichmann, W. M., Collins, J. E., Burbine, S. A., Thornhill, T. S., Wright, J., Katz, J. N. and Losina, E., “Estimating the burden of total knee replacement in the United States,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American volume, 95(5), pp. 385–392 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, C., Andrews, R., Barrett, M., Weiss, A., “HCUP Projections: mobility/orthopedic procedures 2011 to 2012. HCUP projections report 2012-03,” US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Available from: www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/projections/2012-03.pdf. (2012)Google Scholar
Lin, F. H., Chen, H. C., Lin, C., Chiu, Y. L., Lee, H. S., Chang, H., Huang, G. S., Chang, H. L., Yeh, S. J., Su, W., Wang, C. C. and Su, S. L., “The increase in total knee replacement surgery in Taiwan: A 15-year retrospective study,” Medicine, 97(31), pp. 1–7 (2018).Google Scholar
Santini, A. J. and Raut, V., “Ten-year survival analysis of the PFC total knee arthroplasty-a surgeon’s first 99 replacements,” International Orthopaedics, 32(4), pp. 459–465 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, V. I., Esler, C. N., and Harper, W. M., “A 15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements,” The Bone and Joint Journal, 89(11), pp. 1452–1456 (2007).Google Scholar
Stavros, G. M., Gonzàlez, D. V. A., Besculides, M. C., Gaber, L., and Sculco, T. P., “In-hospital complications and mortality of unilateral, bilateral, and revision TKA: based on an estimate of 4,159,661 discharges,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466(11), pp. 2617–2627 (2008).Google Scholar
Yoshita, S., Kurosaka, M. and Kuroda, R., “Complications of Total Knee Arthroplasty,” The Journal of the Japan Medical Association, 123, pp. 475–479 (2000).Google Scholar
Insall, J. N., Surgery of the Knee, 2nd Edition, Churchill Livingstone, New York, USA (1993).Google Scholar
Watanabe, K., Minoda, Y., Iwaki, H., Ikebuchi, M., Hashimoto, Y., Fukunaga, K., Iida, T., Ikawa, T., Nishikino, S. and Nakamura, H., “High incidence of anterior femoral cortex notching using navigation system in TKA,” 56th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, New Orleans, USA (2010).Google Scholar
Ritter, M. A., Thong, A. E., Keating, E. M., Faris, P. M., Meding, J. B., Berend, M. E., Pierson, J. L. and Davis, K.E., “The effect of femoral notching during total knee arthroplasty on the prevalence of postoperative femoral fractures and on clinical outcome,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 87(11), pp. 2411–2414 (2005).Google Scholar
Gujarathi, N., Putti, A. B., Abboud, R. J., MacLean, J. G., Espley, A. J. and Kellett, C. F., “Risk of periprosthetic fracture after anterior femoral notching,” Acta Orthopaedica, 80(5), pp. 553–556 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shawen, S. B., Belmont, P. J., Klemme, W. R., Topoleski, L. D., Xenos, J. S. and Orchowski, J. R., “Osteoporosis and Anterior Femoral Notching in Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femoral Fractures,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85(1), pp. 115–121 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesh, M. L., Schneider, D. J., Deol, G., Davis, B., Jacobs, C. R. and Pellegrini, V. D., “The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty: A biomechanical study,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 82(8), pp. 1096–1101 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, P. R., Rubash, H. E., Wissinger, H. A. and McClain, E. J., “Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 208, pp. 205–214 (1986).Google Scholar
Hirsh, D. M., Bhalla, S. and Roffman, M., “Supracondylar fracture of the femur following total knee replacement. Report of four cases,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 63, pp. 162–163 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, P. R., Rubash, H. E., Wissinger, H. A. and McClain, E. J., “Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 208, pp. 205–214 (1986).Google Scholar
Merkel, K. and Johnson, E. W., “Supracondylar fractures in the femur after total knee arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 68, pp. 29–43 (1986).Google Scholar
Yoo, J. D. and Kim, N. K., “Periprosthetic Fractures Following Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Knee Surgery and Related Research, 27(1), pp. 1–9 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delport, P. H., Van, A. R., Martens, M. and Mulier, J. C., “Conservative treatment of ipsilateral supracondylar femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty,” The Journal of Trauma, 24, pp. 846–849 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, R. A. and Schairer, W. W., “Costs and risk factors for hospital readmission after periprosthetic knee fractures in the United States,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, 33(2), pp. 324–330 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edward, S., Caleb, B., Jeff, B., Peter, C., and Stephen, K., “Mortality and financial burden of periprosthetic fractures of the femur,” Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 5(4), pp. 147–153 (2014).Google Scholar
Zalzal, P., Backstein, D., Gross, A. E. and Papini, M., “Notching of the anterior femoral cortex during total knee arthroplasty characteristics that increase local stresses,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, 21(5), pp. 737–743 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culp, R. W., Schmidt, R. G., Hanks, G., Mak, A., Esterhai, J. L., and Heppenstall, R. B., “Supracondylar fracture of the femur following prosthetic knee arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 222, pp. 212–222 (1987).Google Scholar
Lombardi, A. V., Mallory, T. H., Waterman, R. A. and Eberle, R. W., “Intercondylar distal femoral fracture. An unreported complication of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty,” The Journal of Arthroplasty, 10(5), pp. 643–650 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubicek, M. and Florian, Z., “Stress strain analysis of knee joint. Engineering Mechanics,” Engineering Mechanics, 16, pp. 315–322 (2009).Google Scholar
SolidWorks, https://www.solidworks.com/Google Scholar
ANSYS, https://www.ansys.com/Google Scholar
Inventor, Autodesk, https://www.autodesk.com.tw/campaigns/inventor (2017)Google Scholar
Minoda, Y., Sakawa, A., Aihara, M., Tada, K., Kadoya, Y. and Kobayashi, A., “Flexion gap preparation opens both the extension and flexion gap during total knee arthroplasty,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 15(11), pp. 1321–1325 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inc, Zimmer., “Zimmer® MIS Multi-Reference® 4-in-1 Femoral Instrumentation Surgical Technique,” USA, Available from: http://www.zimmer.com/content/dam/zimmer-web/documents/en-US/pdf/surgical-techniques/knee/zimmer-mis-multi-reference-4-in-1-femoral-instrumentation-surgical-technique.pdf (2009)Google Scholar
Lu, T. W. and Lu, C. H., “Forces Transmitted in the Knee Joint During Stair Ascent and Descent,” Journal of Mechanics, 22(4), pp. 289–297 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, I. P., Hsu, W. C., Chien, H. L., Chang, C. F., Liu, Y. H., Ho, T. J., Wang, T. M., Lin, J. G. and Lu, T. W., “Leg and Joint Stiffness in Patients with Bilateral Medial Knee Osteoarthritis During Level Walking,” Journal of Mechanics, 25(3), pp. 279–287 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. C., Lu, C. C., Chen, R., Yeh, M. K., Wu, J. J. and Huang, T. L., “Finite element analysis for AC joint complex of human shoulder and its clinical applications biomedical engineering,” Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications, 26(2) (2014).Google Scholar
Bayraktar, H. H., Morgan, E. F., Niebur, G. L., Morris, G. E., Wong, E. K. and Keaveny, T. M., “Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue,” Journal of Biomechanics, 37, pp. 27–35 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, F., Jiang, X., Duan, S., Xiao, Z., Xiao, S. and Shi, W., “Parametric analysis of occupant ankle and tibia injuries in frontal impact,” Plos One, 12(9) (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtz, D. C., Schiffers, N., Pandorf, T., Radermacher, K., Weichert, D. and Forst, R., “Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur,” Journal of Biomechanics, 33(10), pp. 1325–1330 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneko, T. S., Bell, J. S., Pejcic, M. R., Tehranzadeh, J. and Keyak, J. H., “Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases,” Journal of Biomechanics, 37(4), pp. 523–530 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, A., Mcnally, C., Kennedy, E., Manoogian, S. and Duma, S., “The material properties of human tibia cortical bone in tension and compression: implications for the tibia index,” The 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV), Lyon, France (2007).Google Scholar
Ding, M., Dalstra, M., Danielsen, C. C., Kabel, J., Hvid, I. and Linde, F., “Age variations in the properties of human tibial trabecular bone,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 79(6), pp. 995–1002 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM F1537 Alloy 3, R31539, “Dispersion strengthened Co-28Cr-6Mo alloy,” MakeItFrom.com (Iron Boar Labs Ltd. project), Available from: https://www.makeitfrom.com/material-properties/Dispersion-Strengthened-Co-28Cr-6Mo-Alloy-ASTM-F1537-Alloy-3-R31539 (2018)Google Scholar
Liau, J. J., Cheng, C. K., Huang, C. H. and Lo, W. H., “The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses - a finite element analysis,” Clinical Biomechanics, 17(2), pp. 140–146 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Lima, D. D., Fregly, B. J., Patil, S., Steklov, N. and Colwell, C. W., “Knee joint forces: prediction, measurement, and significance,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 226(2), pp. 95102 (2012).Google Scholar
Keaveny, T. M., Morgan, E. F. and Yeh, O. C., Bone mechanics. In: Kutz M, Standard Handbook of Biomedical Engineering & Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, pp. 221–243 (2009).Google Scholar
Öhman, C., Baleani, M., Pani, C., Taddei, F., Alberghini, M., Viceconti, M. and Manfrini, M., “Compressive behaviour of child and adult cortical bone,” Bone, 49(4), pp. 769–776 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijayakumar, V. and Quenneville, C. E., “Quantifying the regional variations in the mechanical properties of cancellous bone of the tibia using indentation testing and quantitative computed tomographic imaging,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 230(6), pp. 588–593 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaz, M. F., Canhão, H. and Fonseca, J. E., “Bone: A Composite Natural Material. In: Těšinova P, Advances in Composite Materials,” London: IntechOpen Inc, pp. 195–228 (2011).Google Scholar