Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:59:28.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow Induced Aerodynamic Noise Analysis of Perforated Tube Mufflers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

C.-N. Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
C.-C. Tse
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
S.-C. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Despite the analysis of muffler performance for many years, most works focus mainly on reducing inlet sound and fail to consider the flow effect. Most of their results correlate well with the experimental measurements. Subsequent works have considered the mean flow effect. Owing to Doppler's effect, transmission loss curve of the muffler will shift in its corresponding frequency. However, the correlation is worse than the experimental results since the flow induced noise does not include in the analysis. This work elucidates how flow induced noise affects muffler performance by analyzing a uniform flow that passes through perforated mufflers. The flow field is calculated with the CFD method, followed by evaluation of the aerodynamic noise based on the simulation results. Additionally, the procedure is simplified by computing and comparing only the total sound power induced by the flow in the muffler interior. Two muffler types, Helmholtz resonator and plug perforated tube muffler, are analyzed and discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Davis, D. D., Stokes, G. M. and Stevens, G. L., Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Mufflers with Comments on Engine-Exhaust Muffler Design, NACA Report No. 1192, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, USA (1954).Google Scholar
2.Igarashi, J. and Toyama, M., “Fundamentals of acoustical Silencers,” I. Theory and Experiment of Acoustic Low-Pass Filters, Report No. 339, Aeronautical Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 223241 (1958).Google Scholar
3.Sullivan, J. W. and Crocker, M. J., “Analysis of Concentric-Tube Resonators Having Unpartitioned Cavities,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, pp. 207215 (1978).Google Scholar
4.Jayaraman, K. and Yam, K., “Decoupling Approach to Mode1ing Perforated Tube Muff1er Components,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, pp. 390396 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Thawani, P. T. and Jayaraman, K., “Modeling and Application of Straight-Through Resonator,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, pp. 13871389 (1983).Google Scholar
6.Munjal, M. L., Rao, K. N. and Sahasrabudhe, A. D., “Aeroacoustic Analysis of Pcrforated Muffle1' Components,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 114, pp. 173188 (1987).Google Scholar
7.Peat, K. S., “A Numerical Decoupling Analysis of Perforated Pipe Silencer Elements,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 123, pp. 199212 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Rao, K. N., “Prediction and Verification of the Aeroacoustic Performance of Perforated-Element Muffler,” PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India (1984).Google Scholar
9.Wang, C. N., “A Numerical Scheme for the Analysis of Perforated Intruding Tube Muffler Components,” Applied Acoustics, 44, pp. 275286 (1995).Google Scholar
10.Gogate, G. R. and Munjal, M. L., “Analytical and Experimental Aeroacoustic Studies of Open-Ended Three-Duct Perforated Elements Used in Mufflers,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, pp. 29192927 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Munjal, M. L., Behera, B. K. and Thawani, P. T., “Transfer Matrix Model for the Reverse-Flow, Three-Duct, Open End Perforated Element Muffler,” Applied Acoustics, 54, pp. 229238 (1998).Google Scholar
12.Munjal, M. L., Behera, B. K., and Thawani, P. T., “An Analytical Model of the Reverse Flow, Open End, Extended Perforated Element Muffler,” International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 2, pp. 5962 (1997).Google Scholar
13.Wang, C. N. and Crocker, M. J., “A Theoretical Study of Mufflers with Open-Ended Intruding Perforated Tubes,” International Journal of Acoustics and Vibration, 7, pp. 172176 (2002).Google Scholar
14.Peat, L. S., “The Transfer Matrix of a Uniform Duct with a Linear Temperature Gradient,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 123, pp. 4353 (1988).Google Scholar
15.Kim, Y. H., Choi, J. W. and Lim, B. D., “Acoustic Characteristics of an Expansion Chamber with Constant Mass Flow and Steady Temperature Gradient (Theory and Numerical Simulation),” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, ASME, 112, pp. 460467 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Wang, C. N., Chen, Y. N. and Tsai, J. Y., “The Application of Boundary Element Evaluation on a Silencer in the Presence of a Linear Temperature Gradien,” Applied Acoustics, 62, pp. 707716 (2001).Google Scholar
17.Wang, C. N., “Numerical Decoupling Analysis of a Resonator with Absorbent Material,” Applied Acoustics, 58, pp. 109122 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Wang, C. N., Wu, C. H. and Wu, T. D., “A Network Approach for Analysis of Silencers With/Without Absorbent Material,” Applied Acoustics, 70, pp. 208214 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Munjal, M. L., Acoustics of Ducts and Mufflers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1987).Google Scholar
20.Ji, Z., Ma, Q., and Zhang, Z., “Application of the Boundary Element Method to Predicting Acoustic Performance of Expansion Chambers with Mean Flow,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 173, pp. 5771 (1994).Google Scholar
21.Wang, C. N., “A Boundary Element Analysis for Simple Expansion Silencers with Mean Flow,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 23, pp. 529536 (2000).Google Scholar
22.Wang, C. N., “Wang a Numerical Analysis for Perforated Muffler Components with Mean Flow, Transactions of the ASME,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 121, pp. 231236 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Roger, M. and Moreau, S., “Extensions and Limitations of Analytical Airfoil Broadband Noise Models,” International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 9, pp. 273305 (2010).Google Scholar
24.Tonon, D., Hirschberg, A., Golliard, J. and Ziada, S., “Aeroacoustics of Pipe Systems with Closed Branches,” International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 10, pp. 201276 (2011).Google Scholar
25.Karlsson, M. and Abom, M., “Aeroacoustics of T-Junctions – An Experimental Investigation,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329, pp. 17931808 (2010).Google Scholar
26.Campos, L. M. B. C. and Lau, F. J. P., “On Sound Generation by Moving Surfaces and Convected Sources in a Flow,” International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 11, pp. 103136 (2012).Google Scholar
27.Mohamud, O. M. and Johnson, P., “Broadband Noise Source Models as Aeroacoustic Tools in Designing Low NVH HVAC Ducts,” SAE paper No. 2006-01-1192 (2006).Google Scholar
28.Fluent 6.3 Users Guide, ANSYS Inc., Lebanon NH (2008).Google Scholar
29.Chen, S. C., “Aeroacoustics Analysis of Air Flow Passing by Perforated Mufflers,” Master Thesis, Department of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University (2011).Google Scholar
30.Proudman, I., “The Generation of Noise by Isotropic Turbulence, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A,” Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 214, pp. 119132 (1952).Google Scholar