Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:03:53.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Uniaxial and biaxial compressive response of a bulk metallic glass composite over a range of strain rates and temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Martin ,
L. Meyer ,
L. Kecskes  and
N.N. Thadhani
M. Martin
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
L. Meyer
Affiliation:
Technical University of Chemnitz, Faculty for Mechanical Engineering, Chemnitz, 09125, Germany
L. Kecskes
Affiliation:
United States Army Research Laboratory, Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005-5069
N.N. Thadhani*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
*
b) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The uniaxial and biaxial compressive responses of Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6–W composite were investigated over a range of strain rates (∼10−3 to 103 s−1) using an Instron universal testing machine (∼10−3 to 10° s−1), drop-weight tower (∼200 s−1), and split Hopkinson pressure bar (103 s−1). The temperature dependence of the mechanical behavior was investigated at temperatures ranging from room temperature to 600 °C using the instrumented drop-weight testing apparatus, mounted with an inductive heating device. The deformed and fractured specimens were examined using optical and scanning electron microscopy. Stopped experiments were used to investigate deformation and failure mechanisms at specified strain intervals in both the drop weight and split Hopkinson bar tests. These stopped specimens were also subsequently examined using optical and scanning electron microscopy to observe shear band and crack formation and development after increasingly more strain. The overall results showed an increase in yield strength with strain rate and a decrease in failure strength, plasticity, and hardening with strain rate. Comparison of uniaxial and biaxial loading showed strong susceptibility to shear failure since the additional 10% shear stress caused failure at much lower strains in all cases. Results also showed a decrease in flow stress and plasticity with increased temperature. Also notable was the anomalous behavior at 450 °C, which lies between the Tg and Tx and is in a temperature regime where homogeneous flow, as opposed to heterogeneous deformation by shear banding, is the dominant mechanism in the bulk metallic glass.

Keywords

AmorphousCompositeStress/strain relationship
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 66 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bruck, H.A., Rosakis, A.J., Johnson, W.L.: The dynamic compressive behavior of beryllium bearing bulk metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 11, 503 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lu, J., Ravichandran, G., Johnson, W.L.: Deformation behavior of the Zr41.2Ti31.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass over a wide range of strain-rates and temperatures. Acta Mater. 51, 3429 2003Google Scholar
3.Subhash, G., Dowding, R.J., Kecskes, L.J.: Characterization of uniaxial compressive response of bulk amorphous Zr–Ti–Cu–Ni–Be alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 334, 33 2002Google Scholar
4.Kawamura, Y., Shibata, T., Inoue, A., Masumoto, T.: Workability of the supercooled liquid in the Zr65Al10Ni10Cu15 bulk metallic glass. Acta Metall. 46, 253 1998Google Scholar
5.Liu, L.F., Dai, L.H., Bai, Y.L., Wei, B.C., Yu, G.S.: Strain rate-dependent compressive deformation behavior of Nd-based bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 13, 827 2005Google Scholar
6.Li, H., Subhash, G., Kecskes, L.J., Dowding, R.J.: Mechanical behavior of tungsten preform reinforced bulk metallic glass composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 403, 134 2005Google Scholar
7.Li, H., Subhash, G., Gao, X-L., Kecskes, L.J., Dowding, R.J.: Negative strain rate sensitivity and compositional dependence of fracture strength in Zr/Hf based bulk metallic glasses. Scr. Mater. 49, 1087 2003Google Scholar
8.Gu, X., Jiao, T., Kecskes, L.J., Woodman, R.H., Fan, C., Ramesh, K.T., Hufnagel, T.C.: Crystallization and mechanical behavior of (Hf,Zr)–Ti–Cu–Ni–Al metallic glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 317, 112 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Sun, J-F., Yang, M., Shun, J.: High strain rate induced embrittlement of Zr-based bulk metallic glass. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 15, 115 2005Google Scholar
10.Dalla Torre, F., Dubach, A., Siegrist, M., Loffler, J.: Negative strain rate sensitivity in bulk metallic glass and its similarities with the dynamic strain aging effect during deformation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 1 2006Google Scholar
11.Mukai, T., Nieh, T., Kawamura, Y., Inoue, A., Higashi, K.: Effect of strain rate on compressive behavior of a Pd40Ni40P20 bulk metallic glass. Intermetallics 10, 1071 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hufnagel, T.C., Jiano, T., Li, Y., Xing, L-Q., Ramesh, K.T.: Deformation and failure of Zr57Ti5Cu20Ni8Al10 bulk metallic glass under quasi-static and dynamic compression. J. Mater. Res. 17, 1441 2002Google Scholar
13.Masumoto, T., Maddin, R.: The mechanical properties of palladium 20 a/o silicon alloy quenched from the liquid state. Acta Metall. 19, 725 1971Google Scholar
14.Jiao, T., Kecskes, L.J., Hufnagel, T.C., Ramesh, K.T.: Deformation and failure of Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6/W particle composites under quasi-static and dynamic compression. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 3439 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Spaepen, F.: A microscopic mechanism for steady state inhomogeneous flow in metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 25, 407 1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Wang, G., Shen, J., Sun, J.F., Lu, Z.P., Stachurski, Z.H., Zhou, B.D.: Compressive fracture characteristics of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass at high test temperatures. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 398, 82 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Heilmaier, M., Eckert, J.: Elevated temperature deformation behavior of Zr-based bulk metallic glasses. Adv. Eng. Mater. 7, 833 2005Google Scholar
18.Wang, Q., Pelletier, J., Blandin, J., Suery, M.: Mechanical properties over the glass transition of Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 bulk metallic glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 2224 2005Google Scholar
19.Falk, M.L., Langer, J.S.: From simulation to theory in the physics of deformation and fracture. MRS Bull. 25, 40 2000Google Scholar
20.Meyer, L., Krueger, L.: Drop weight compression-shear testing, in Mechanical Testing and Evaluation. ASM Handbook, Vol. 8 ASM International Materials Park, OH 2000 452454Google Scholar
21.Li, J.X., Shan, G.B., Gao, K.W., Qiao, L.J., Chu, W.Y.: In situ study of formation and growth of shear bands and microcracks in bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 354, 337 2003Google Scholar
22.Donovan, P.E.: Compressive deformation of amorphous Pd40Ni40P20. Acta Mater. 37, 445 1988Google Scholar
23.Meyer, L.W., Staskewich, E., Burblies, A.: Adiabatic shear failure under biaxial dynamic compression/shear loading. Mech. Mater. 17, 203 1994Google Scholar
24.Loffler, J.G., Bossuyt, S., Glade, S.C., Johnson, W.L., Wagner, W., Thiyagarajan, P.: Crystallization of bulk amorphous Zr–Ti(Nb)–Cu–Ni–Al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 525 2000Google Scholar
25.Choi-Yim, H., Busch, R., Koster, U., Johnson, W.L.: Synthesis and characterization of particulate reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 bulk metallic glass composites. Acta Mater. 47, 2455 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Hopkinson, B.: A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets. Roy. Soc. Phil. Trans., A 213, 437 1914Google Scholar
27.Sunny, G., Yuan, F., Lewandowski, J.J., Prakash, V.: Dynamic stress-strain response of Zr41.25Ti13.75Ni10Cu12.5Be22.5 bulk metallic glass, in Proceedings of the 2005 SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics Society for Experimental Mechanics Bethel, CT 2005 157164Google Scholar
28.Meyers, M.A.: Experimental techniques: Methods to produce dynamic deformationDynamic Behavior of Materials John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York 1994 305310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Conner, R.D., Choi-Yim, H., Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 metallic glass matrix particulate composites. J. Mater. Res. 14, 3292 1999Google Scholar
30.Gumbsch, P.: Brittle fracture and the brittle-to-ductile transition of tungsten. J. Nucl. Mater. 323, 304 2003Google Scholar
31.Islam, S., Tufail, M., Qu, X.: Mechanical properties variation with test temperature for liquid phase sintered 95W–3.5Ni–1.5Fe alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum 561 – 565, 647 2007Google Scholar