Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:07:26.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transmission electron microscopy studies of interfacial reactions and void formation in lead-free solders with minor elements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P.K. Lam
Affiliation:
Intel Malaysia, Kulim Hi-Tech 2/3, 09000 Kulim, Malaysia
T.Y. Tou*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Multimedia University, 63100 Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Electroless nickel (Ni–P) is a common surface finish used in the ball grid array (BGA) package and interfacial reactions between its surface finish and lead-free solders can form complex intermetallic compound (IMC) layers. The presence of minor elements in lead-free solders either intentionally added or due to impurity contamination during solder manufacturing, can affect the solder-joint performance. In this work, interfacial reactions between Ni–P surface finish and the Sn–Ag–Cu solders were modified by varying Ag and Cu contents and also by adding a small amount of minor elements such as phosphorus (P), indium (In), and germanium (Ge). A transmission electron microscope was used to determine the intermetallic layer phases, compositions, crystal structures, and void defects. Varying the solder alloy elements led to the modulation of voids formation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Donald, C.Comparing today's HASL alternativesProceedings of the IPC National Conference: A Summit on PWB Surface Finish and Solderability (Association Connecting Electronics Industries, Austin, TX 1998)44Google Scholar
2.Coyle, R.J., Popps, D.E.H., Mawer, A., Cullen, D.P., Wenger, G.M., Solan, P.P.The effect of modifications to the nickel/gold surface finish on assembly quality and attachment reliability of a plastic ball grid array. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 26, 724 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Universal Instruments Technical report: Fragility of lead-free solder joints. (2004 www.pcbrc.com/dev/PDFs/WhitePaper-SACfragility1.pdf)Google Scholar
4.Reiff, D.E., Bradley, E.A novel mechanical shock test method to evaluate lead-free BGA solder joint reliabilityIEEE Proceedings of the 55th Electronic Components Technology Conference (Orlando, FL 2005)1519Google Scholar
5.Banerji, K., Darveaux, R.F.Effect of aging on the strength and ductility of controlled collapse solder jointsProceedings of the 1st International Conference on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Aging Mater edited by P.K. Viswanathan, K.L. Murty, Simonen, and D.R. Frear (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA 1992)431Google Scholar
6.Chin, Y.T., Lam, P.K., Yow, H.K., Tou, T.Y.Investigation of mechanical shock testing of lead-free SAC solder joints in fine pitch BGA package. Microelectron. Reliab. 48, 1079 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Zeng, K., Stierman, R., Abbott, D., Murtuza, M.Root cause of black pad failure of solder joints with electroless nickel/immersion gold platingIEEE Proceedings of the Thermal and Theromomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (San Diego, CA 2006)1111Google Scholar
8.Tu, K.N., Zeng, K.Reliability issues of lead-free solder joints in electronic packaging technologyIEEE Proceedings of the 52nd Electronic Components Technology Conference (San Diego, CA 2002)1194Google Scholar
9.Bansal, A., Yoon, S., Mahadev, V.Flexural strength of BGA solder joints with ENIG substrate finish using 4-point bend testProceedings of the SMTA Pan Pacific Symposium (SMT Association, Kauai, HI 2005)25Google Scholar
10.Jang, J.W., Kim, P.G., Tu, K.N., Frear, D.R., Thompson, P.Solder reaction assisted crystallization of electroless Ni–P under bump metallization in low cost flip chip technology. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 8456 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Goyal, D., Lane, T., Kenzie, P., Panichas, C., Chong, K.M., Villalobos, O.Failure mechanism of brittle solder joint fracture in the presence of electroless nickel immersion gold (ENIG) interfaceIEEE Proceedings of the 52nd Electronic Components Technology Conference (San Diego, CA 2002)732Google Scholar
12.Zeng, K., Tu, K.N.Six cases of reliability study of lead-free solder joints in electronic packaging technology. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 38, 55 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Jeon, Y.D., Paik, K.W., Book, K.S., Choi, W.S., Cho, C.L.Studies on Ni–Sn intermetallic compound and P-rich Ni layer at the electroless nickel UBM solder interface and their effects on flip chip solder joint reliabilityIEEE Proceedings of the 51st Electronic Components Technology Conference (Orlando, FL 2001)1326Google Scholar
14.He, M., Chen, Z., Qi, G.Solid state interfacial reaction of Sn–37Pb and Sn–3.5Ag solders with Ni–P under bump metallization. Acta Mater. 52, 2047 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Anhock, A.O., Oppermann, H., Aschenbrenner, R., Reichl, H.Reliability of electroless nickel for high temp applicationIEEE Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advanced Packaging Material (Braselton, GA 1999)256Google Scholar
16.Wang, S.J., Liu, C.Y.Retarding growth of Ni3P crystallize layer in Ni(P) substrate by reacting with Cu bearing Sn(Cu) solders. Scr. Mater. 49, 813 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Zhang, X.F., Guo, J.D., Shang, J.K.Controlling intermetallic compound formation reaction between Sn and Ni–P by Zn addition. J. Alloys Compd. 479, 505 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Sharif, A., Chan, Y.C.Liquid and solid state interfacial reactions of Sn–Ag–Cu and Sn–In–Ag–Cu solders with Ni–P under bump metallization. Thin Solid Films 504, 431 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Gao, J., Wu, Y., Liu, L., Shen, B., Hu, W.Crystallization temperature of amorphous electroless nickel-phosphorus alloys. Mater. Lett. 59, 1665 (2005)Google Scholar
20.Chen, W.T., Ho, C.E., Kao, C.R.Effect of Cu concentration on the interfacial reactions between Ni and Sn–Cu solders. J. Mater. Res. 17, 263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Jeon, Y.D., Nieland, S., Ostmann, A., Reichl, H., Paik, K.W.A study on interfacial reactions between electroless Ni–P under bump metallization and 95.5Sn–4Ag–0.5Cu alloy. J. Electron. Mater. 32, 548 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Schmetterer, C., Vizdal, J., Flandorfer, H., Ipser, H. Phase equilibra in Ni–P–Sn. COST 531 Final Meeting Vienna (2007 www.slideworld.com/slideshows.aspx/Phase-Equilibria-in-Ni-P-Sn-ppt-950785)Google Scholar
23.Shangguan, D.Lead-free Solder Interconnect Reliability (ASM International, Materials Park, OH 2005)33Google Scholar
24.Kao, C.R. Cross interaction between Cu and Ni in leadfree solder joints TMS Lead-free Workshop, San Antonio (2006 www.iweb.tms.org/Communities/FTAttachments/PbFreeSolders&Interface.pdf)Google Scholar
25.Kulojarvi, K., Vuorinen, V., Kivilahti, J.K.Effect of dissolution and intermetallic formation on reliability of FC joints. Microelectron. Int. 15, 20 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Zeng, K., Kivilahti, J.K.Use of multicomponent phase diagram for predicting phase evolution on solders/conductors systems. J. Electron. Mater. 30, 35 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Matsuki, H., Ibuka, H., Saka, H.TEM observation of interfaces in a solder joint in a semiconductor device. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 3, 261 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar