Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:03:07.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time-dependent mechanical characterization of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels using nanoindentation and unconfined compression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jessica D. Kaufman ,
Gregory J. Miller ,
Elise F. Morgan  and
Catherine M. Klapperich
Jessica D. Kaufman*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Gregory J. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Elise F. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Catherine M. Klapperich
Affiliation:
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogels pose unique challenges to nanoindentation including sample preparation, control of experimental parameters, and limitations imposed by mechanical testing instruments and data analysis originally intended for harder materials. The artifacts that occur during nanoindentation of hydrated samples have been described, but the material properties obtained from hydrated nanoindentation have not yet been related to the material properties obtained from macroscale testing. To evaluate the best method for correlating results from microscale and macroscale tests of soft materials, nanoindentation and unconfined compression stress-relaxation tests were performed on poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (pHEMA) hydrogels with a range of cross-linker concentrations. The nanoindentation data were analyzed with the Oliver–Pharr elastic model and the Maxwell–Wiechert (j = 2) viscoelastic model. The unconfined compression data were analyzed with the Maxwell–Wiechert model. This viscoelastic model provided an excellent fit for the stress-relaxation curves from both tests. The time constants from nanoindentation and unconfined compression were significantly different, and we propose that these differences are due to differences in equilibration time between the microscale and macroscale experiments and in sample geometry. The Maxwell–Wiechert equilibrium modulus provided the best agreement between nanoindentation and unconfined compression. Also, both nanoindentation analyses showed an increase in modulus with each increasing cross-linker concentration, validating that nanoindentation can discriminate between similar, low-modulus, hydrated samples.

Keywords

BiomaterialTribologyViscoelasticity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , May 2008 , pp. 1472 - 1481
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Engler, A.J., Griffin, M.A., Sen, S., Bonnemann, C.G., Sweeney, H.L.Discher, D.E.: Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: Pathological implications for soft or stiff environments. J. Cell Bio. 166, 877 2004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Engler, A.J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H.L.Discher, D.E.: Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677 2006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Wong, J.Y., Velasco, A., Rajagopalan, P.Pham, Q.: Directed movement of vascular smooth muscle cells on gradient-compliant hydrogels. Langmuir 19, 1908 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Haque, F.: Application of nanoindentation to development of biomedical materials. Surf. Eng. 19, 255 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5VanLandingham, M.R., Villarrubia, J.S., Guthrie, W.F.Meyers, G.F.: Nanoindentation of polymers: An overview. Macromol. Symp. 167, 15 20013.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Oyen, M.L.: Spherical indentation creep following ramp loading. J. Mater. Res. 20, 2094 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Cheng, L., Xia, X., Yu, W., Scriven, L.E.Gerberich, W.W.: Flat-punch indentation of viscoelastic material. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Phys. 38, 10 20003.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Cheng, L., Xia, X., Scriven, L.E.Gerberich, W.W.: Spherical-tip indentation of viscoelastic material. Mech. Mater. 37, 213 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Fujisawa, N.Swain, M.V.: Effect of unloading strain rate on the elastic modulus of a viscoelastic solid determined by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 21, 708 2006Google Scholar
10Gupta, S., Carrillo, F., Li, C., Pruitt, L.Puttlitz, C.: Adhesive forces significantly affect elastic modulus determination of soft polymeric materials in nanoindentation. Mater. Lett. 61, 448 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Carrillo, F., Gupta, S., Balooch, M., Marshall, S.J., Marshall, G.W., Pruitt, L.Puttlitz, C.M.: Nanoindentation of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Effect of crosslinking, work of adhesion, and fluid environment on elastic modulus. J. Mater. Res. 20, 2820 2005Google Scholar
12Carrillo, F., Gupta, S., Balooch, M., Marshall, S.J., Marshall, G.W., Pruitt, L.Puttlitz, C.M.: Erratum: Nanoindentation of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Effect of crosslinking, work of adhesion, and fluid environment on elastic modulus. J. Mater. Res. 21, 535 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Fischer-Cripps, A.C.: Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data. Surf. Coat Technol. 200, 4153 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Cao, Y., Yang, D.Soboyejoy, W.: Nanoindentation method for determining the initial contact and adhesion characteristics of soft polydimethylsiloxane. J. Mater. Res. 20, 2004 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Klapperich, C., Komvopoulos, K.Pruitt, L.: Nanomechanical properties of polymers determined from nanoindentation experiments. J. Tribol. 123, 624 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Hayes, S.A., Goruppa, A.A.Jones, F.R.: Dynamic nanoindentation as a tool for examination of polymeric materials. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3298 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Cheng, Y-T., Page, T., Pharr, G.M., Swain, M.V.Wahl, K.J.: Fundamentals and applications of instrumented indentation in multidisciplinary research. J. Mater. Res. 19, 1 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Bembey, A.K., Oyen, M.L., Bushby, A.J.Boyde, A.: Viscoelastic properties of bone as a function of hydration state determined by nanoindentation. Philos. Mag. 86, 5691 2006Google Scholar
19Thomas, J., Gomes, K., Lowman, A.Marcolongo, M.: The effect of dehydration history on PVA/PVP hydrogels for nucleus pulposus replacement. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 69, 135 2004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20White, C.C., Vanlandingham, M.R., Drzal, P.L., Chang, N.K.Chang, S.H.: Viscoelastic characterization of polymers using instrumented indentation. II. Dynamic testing. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 43, 1812 2005Google Scholar
21Odegard, G.M., Gates, T.S.Herring, H.M.: Characterization of viscoelastic properties of polymeric materials through nanoindentation. Exp. Mech. 45, 130 2005Google Scholar
22Bouaita, N., Bull, S.J., Palacio, J. FernandezWhite, J.R.: Dynamic nanoindentation of some polyolefins. Polym. Eng. Sci. 46, 1160 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Huang, G.Lu, H.: Measurements of two independent viscoelastic functions by nanoindentation. Exp. Mech. 47, 87 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Ebenstein, D.M.Pruitt, L.: Nanoindentation of soft hydrated materials for application to vascular tissues. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 69A, 222 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Roylance, D.: Mechanics of Materials John Wiley New York 1996Google Scholar
26Oliver, W.C.Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic-modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Khalsa, P.S.Eisenberg, S.R.: Compressive behavior of articular cartilage is not completely explained by proteoglycan osmotic pressure. J. Biomech. 30, 589 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Gupta, S., Carrillo, F., Balooch, M., Pruitt, L.Puttlitz, C.: Simulated soft tissue nanoindentation: A finite element study. J. Mater. Res. 20, 1979 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Tang, B.Ngan, A.H.W.: Accurate measurement of tip—sample contact size during nanoindentation of viscoelastic materials. J. Mater. Res. 18, 1141 2003Google Scholar
30Sasaki, S.: Stress relaxation of deformed gel in a good solvent. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5789 2004Google Scholar
31Mak, A.F., Lai, W.M.Mow, V.C.: Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage—I. Theoretical analysis. J. Biomech. 20, 703 1987Google Scholar
32Simha, N.K., Jin, H., Hall, M.L., Chiravarambath, S., Lewis, J.L.: Effect of indenter size on elastic modulus of cartilage measured by indentation. J. Biomech. Eng. 129, 767 2007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Ebenstein, D.M.Wahl, K.J.: A comparison of JKR-based methods to analyze quasi-static and dynamic indentation force curves. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298, 652 2006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Wahl, K.J., Asif, S.A.S., Greenwood, J.A.Johnson, K.L.: Oscillating adhesive contacts between micron-scale tips and compliant polymers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 296, 178 2006Google Scholar