Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:25:48.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal shock resistance of double-layer thermal barrier coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2020

Yang Feng Open the ORCID record for Yang Feng [Opens in a new window] ,
Tian-shun Dong Open the ORCID record for Tian-shun Dong [Opens in a new window] ,
Bin-guo Fu ,
Guo-lu Li Open the ORCID record for Guo-lu Li [Opens in a new window] ,
Qi Liu  and
Ran Wang
Yang Feng
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin300130, China
Tian-shun Dong*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin300130, China
Bin-guo Fu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin300130, China
Guo-lu Li*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin300130, China
Qi Liu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin300130, China
Ran Wang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin300130, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: [email protected]
b)e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

To reveal the thermal shock resistance of double-layer thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), two types of TBCs were prepared via atmospheric plasma spraying, i.e., Gd2Zr2O7/yttria-stabilized zirconia (GZ/YSZ) TBCs and La2Zr2O7 (LZ)/YSZ TBCs, respectively. Subsequently, thermal cycling tests of the two TBCs were conducted at 1100 °C and their thermal shock resistance and failure mechanism were comparatively investigated through experiments and the finite element method. The results showed that the thermal shock failure of the two TBCs occurred inside the top ceramic coating. However, the GZ/YSZ TBCs had longer thermal cycling life. It was the mechanical properties of the top ceramic coating, and the thermal stresses arising from the thermal mismatch between the top ceramic coating and the substrate that determined the thermal cycling life of the two TBCs together. Compared with the LZ layer in the LZ/YSZ TBCs, the GZ layer in the GZ/YSZ TBCs had smaller elastic modulus, larger fracture toughness, and smaller thermal stresses, which led to the higher crack propagation resistance and less spallation tendency of the GZ/YSZ TBCs. Therefore, the GZ/YSZ TBCs exhibited superior thermal shock resistance to the LZ/YSZ TBCs.

Keywords

gadolinium zirconatedouble-layer TBCsthermal shock resistancefinite element methodthermal barrier coatings
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 35 , Issue 20 , 28 October 2020 , pp. 2808 - 2816
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fang, Y-C., Cui, X-F., Jin, G., Lu, B-W., Wang, F-Y., Liu, M., and Wen, X.: Influence of SiC fiber on thermal cycling lifetime of SiC fibers/YSZ thermal barrier coatings by atmospheric plasma spraying. Ceram. Int. 44, 18285 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Gan, G-Y., Ge, Z-H., Seng, P., and Feng, J.: Microstructure and thermophysical properties of CeO2-doped SmTaO4 ceramics for thermal barrier coatings. J. Mater. Res. 35, 242 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X-F., Xiang, H-M., Sun, X., Liu, J-C., Hou, F., and Zhou, Y-C.: Thermal properties of a prospective thermal barrier material: Yb3Al5O12. J. Mater. Res. 29, 2673 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R., Dong, T-S., Di, Y-L., Wang, H-D., Li, G-L., and Liu, L.: High temperature oxidation resistance and thermal growth oxides formation and growth mechanism of double-layer thermal barrier coatings. J. Alloys Compd. 798, 773 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, Y., Fan, W., Liu, K., Kang, Y-X., Gao, Y., and Ma, F.: Gradient La2Ce2O7/YSZ thermal barrier coatings tailored by synchronous dual powder feeding system. Mater. Lett. 219, 55 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klement, U., Ekberg, J., Creci, S., and Kelly, S.T.: Porosity measurements in suspension plasma sprayed YSZ coatings using NMR cryoporometry and X-ray microscopy. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 15, 753 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, X-Q., Vassen, R., Tietz, F., and Stoever, D.: New doubleceramic-layer thermal barrier coatings based on zirconia-rare earth composite oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 26, 247 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassen, R., Traeger, E., and Stover, D.: New thermal barrier coatings based on pyrochlore/YSZ double-layer systems. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 1, 351 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahade, S., Curry, N., Bjorklund, S., Markocsan, N., and Nylen, P.: Failure analysis of Gd2Zr2O7/YSZ multi-layered thermal barrier coatings subjected to thermal cyclic fatigue. J. Alloys Compd. 689, 1011 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, T-S., Wang, R., Di, Y-L., Wang, H-D., Li, G-L., and Fu, B-G.: Mechanism of high temperature oxidation resistance improvement of double-layer thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) by La. Ceram. Int. 45, 9126 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassen, R., Jarligo, M.O., Steinke, T., Mack, D.E., and Stover, D.: Overview on advanced thermal barrier coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 205, 938 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, W., Xu, Q., Qi, L-H., Wang, J-D., Miao, H-H., Mori, K., and Torigoe, T.: Novel low thermal conductivity ceramic materials for thermal barrier coatings. Key Eng. Mater. 280–283, 1497 (2005).Google Scholar
Lehmann, H., Pitzer, D., Pracht, G., Vassen, R., and Stöver, D.: Thermal conductivity and thermal expansion coefficients of the lanthanum rare-earth-element zirconate system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86, 1338 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K.S., Jung, K.I., Heo, Y.S., Kim, T.W., Jung, Y.G., and Paik, U.: Thermal and mechanical properties of sintered bodies and EB-PVD layers of Y2O3 added Gd2Zr2O7 ceramics for thermal barrier coatings. J. Alloys Compd. 507, 448 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, D-P., Mack, D.E., Bakan, E., Mauer, G., Sebold, D., Guillon, O., and Vassen, R.: Thermal cycling performances of multilayered yttria-stabilized zirconia/gadolinium zirconate thermal barrier coatings. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 103, 2048 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musalek, R., Tesar, T., Medricky, J., Lukac, F., Chraska, T., and Gupta, M.: Microstructures and thermal cycling properties of thermal barrier coatings deposited by hybrid water-stabilized plasma torch. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 29, 444 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashmi, P.G., Majithia, S., Shwetha, V., Balaji, N., and Aruna, S.T.: Improved hot corrosion resistance of plasma sprayed YSZ/Gd2Zr2O7 thermal barrier coating over single layer YSZ. Mater. Charact. 147, 199 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassen, R., Traeger, F., and Stover, D.: Correlation between spraying conditions and microcrack density and their influence on thermal cycling life of thermal barrier coatings. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 13, 396 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giolli, C., Scrivani, A., Rizzi, G., Borgioli, F., Bolelli, G., and Lusvarghi, L.: Failure mechanism for thermal fatigue of thermal barrier coating systems. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 18, 223 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portinha, A., Teixeira, V., Carneiro, J., Beghi, M.G., Bottani, C.E., Franco, N., Vassen, R., Stoever, D., and Sequeira, A.D.: Residual stresses and elastic modulus of thermal barrier coatings graded in porosity. Surf. Coat. Technol. 188, 120 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H., Li, F., Wang, J., and Sun, B-D.: Microstructure analyses and thermophysical properties of nanostructured thermal barrier coatings. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 6, 383 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbas, M., Guo, H-B., and Shahid, M.R.: Comparative study on effect of oxide thickness on stress distribution of traditional and nanostructured zirconia coating systems. Ceram. Int. 39, 475 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourbafrani, M., Razavi, R.S., Bakhshi, S.R., Loghman-Estarki, M.R., and Jamali, H.: Effect of microstructure and phase of nanostructured YSZ thermal barrier coatings on its thermal shock behaviour. Surf. Eng. 31, 64 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P-Z., Le, L., Ma, L., Zhou, H-B., Wang, C., and Lei, X-G.: Effect of Nb and Ta dopants on mechanical and thermal properties of tetragonal YSZ: First-principles calculations. Chinese Rare Earths 35, 13 (2014).Google Scholar
Delin, S.: Mechanical Properties of Engineering Materials (Beijing, Machinery Industry Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Wang, L., Wang, Y., Sun, X-G., He, J-Q., Pan, Z-Y., and Wang, C-H.: Finite element simulation of residual stress of double-ceramic-layer La2Zr2O7/8YSZ thermal barrier coatings using birth and death element technique. Comput. Mater. Sci. 53, 117 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Wang, J-S., Dong, S-J., Yuan, J-Y., Zhou, X., Duo, S-W., Chen, S., Huo, P-J., Jiang, J-N., Deng, L-H., and Cao, X-Q.: Mechanical properties and thermal cycling behavior of Ta2O5 doped La2Ce2O7 thermal barrier coatings prepared by atmospheric plasma spraying. J. Alloys Compd. 785, 1068 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomimatsu, T., Kagawa, Y., and Zhu, S.J.: Residual stress distribution in electron beam-physical vapor deposited ZrO2 thermal barrier coating layer by raman spectroscopy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 34, 1739 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J-J., Ma, J-L., Li, G-L., Wang, H-D., Xu, B-S., and Wang, C-B.: Bimodal distribution characteristic of microstructure and mechanical properties of nanostructured composite ceramic coatings prepared by supersonic plasma spraying. Mater. Des. 64, 755 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstis, G.R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B.R., and Marshall, D.B.: A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: I – Direct crack measurements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 533 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Put, A.V., Oquab, D., and Monceau, D.: Characterization of TBC systems with NiPtAl or NiCoCrAlYTa bond coatings after thermal cycling at 1100 degrees C: A comparative study of failure mechanisms. Mater. Sci. Forum 595–598, 213 (2008).Google Scholar
Zhong, X-H., Zhao, H-Y., Zhou, X-M., Liu, C-G., Wang, L., Shao, F., Yang, K., Tao, S-Y., and Ding, C-X.: Thermal shock behavior of toughened gadolinium zirconate/YSZ double-ceramic-layered thermal barrier coating. J. Alloys Compd. 593, 50 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C-L., Fei, J-M., Guo, L., Yu, J-X., Zhang, B-B., Yan, Z., and Ye, F-X.: Thermal cycling and hot corrosion behavior of a novel LaPO4/YSZ double-ceramic-layer thermal barrier coating. Ceram. Int. 44, 8818 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, W-Q., Sun, X-G., He, J-Q., Pan, Z-Y., and Wang, C-H.: Finite element simulation of stress distribution and development in 8YSZ and double-ceramic-layer La2Zr2O7/ 8YSZ thermal barrier coatings during thermal shock. Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 3540 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar