Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:57:39.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surfactant-assisted nanorod synthesis of α-FeOOH and its adsorption characteristics for methylene blue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2014

Jinhua Zhang ,
Xiaomeng Zhu  and
Kun Yu
Jinhua Zhang*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Jiangsu Province for Chemical Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, People’s Republic of China
Xiaomeng Zhu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Jiangsu Province for Chemical Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, People’s Republic of China
Kun Yu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Jiangsu Province for Chemical Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was chosen as the structure controller and surface modifier for hydrothermal preparation of surfactant-modified goethite (α-FeOOH) nanorods. The as-synthesized samples were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Brunauer, Emmett and Teller technique, and potentiometric titration. Adsorption study using methylene blue (MB) as a model pollutant was conducted onto the surfactant-modified goethite surface. The results showed that the surfactant-modified α-FeOOH nanorods had high adsorption capacity. MB could be efficiently removed from the solution at pH 5, initial MB concentration 200 mg/L, α-FeOOH dosage 0.5 g/L, and temperature 30 °C, with 96% removal ratio. The adsorption capacity was found to be as high as 385 mg/g. The adsorption kinetic data could be described well by the pseudo-second-order model. The isothermic data were highly fitted to Langmuir isotherm. High adsorption capacity and simple reaction conditions give this novel material good prospects in future applications.

Keywords

surfactant-assisted nanorod synthesisα-FeOOHadsorption
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , 28 February 2014 , pp. 509 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Haque, M.F. and Arajs, S.: Electroconvective heat transfer in a suspension of rod-like akageneite particle (β-FeOOH). Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 42(9), 1617 (1999).Google Scholar
Einaga, Y., Taguchi, M., Li, G., Akitsu, T., Gu, Z., Sugai, T., and Sato, O.: Magnetization increase of iron oxide by photoinduced aggregation of spiropyran. Chem. Mater. 15(1), 8 (2003).Google Scholar
Srivastava, D.N., Perkas, N., Gedanken, A., and Felner, I.: Sonochemical synthesis of mesoporous iron oxide and accounts of its magnetic and catalytic properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 106(8), 1878 (2002).Google Scholar
Miteva, S. and Stoimenova, M.: Electro-optic characteristics of aqueous β-FeOOH particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 273(2), 490 (2004).Google Scholar
Toledano, D.S. and Henrich, V.E.: Kinetics of SO2 adsorption on photoexcited α-Fe2O3 . J. Phys. Chem. B 105(18), 3872 (2001).Google Scholar
Schwertmann, U. and Cornell, R.M.: Iron Oxides in the Laboratory: Preparation and Characterization, 2nd ed. (Wiley-VCH, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
Apblett, A.W., Kuriyavar, S.I., and Kiran, B.P.: Preparation of micron-sized spherical porous iron oxide particles. J. Mater. Chem. 13(5), 983 (2003).Google Scholar
Grossl, P.R., Eick, M., Sparks, D.L., Goldberg, S., and Ainsworth, C.C.: Arsenate and chromate retention mechanism on goethite. 2. Kinetic evaluation using a pressure-jump relaxation technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 321 (1997).Google Scholar
Jaiswal, A., Banerjee, S., Mani, R., and Chattopadhyaya, M.C.: Synthesis, characterization and application of goethite mineral as an adsorbent. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 1(3), 281 (2013).Google Scholar
Nassar, N.N.: Kinetics, mechanistic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of acid red dye from wastewater by γ-Fe2O3 nanoadsorbents. Sep. Sci. Technol. 45(8), 1092 (2010).Google Scholar
Nassar, N.N.: Rapid removal and recovery of Pb(II) from wastewater by magnetic nanoadsorbents. J. Hazard. Mater. 184(1–3), 538 (2010).Google Scholar
Nassar, N.N.: Kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies on the adsorptive removal of nickel, cadmium and cobalt from wastewater by superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoadsorbents. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 90(5), 1231 (2012).Google Scholar
Hristovski, K., Baumgardner, A., and Westerhoff, P.: Selecting metal oxide nanomaterials for arsenic removal in fixed bed columns: From nanopowders to aggregated nanoparticle media. J. Hazard. Mater. 147(1), 265 (2007).Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Geng, J., Wang, X., Gu, X., and Gao, S.: Adsorption of tetracycline onto goethite in the presence of metal cations and humic substances. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 361(1), 247 (2011).Google Scholar
Granados-Correa, F., Corral-Capulin, N.G., Olguín, M.T., and Acosta-León, C.E.: Comparison of the Cd(II) adsorption processes between boehmite (γ-AlOOH) and goethite (α-FeOOH). Chem. Eng. J. 171(3), 1027 (2011).Google Scholar
Mustafa, G., Singh, B., and Kookana, R.S.: Cadmium adsorption and desorption behaviour on goethite at low equilibrium concentrations: Effects of pH and index cations. Chemosphere 57(10), 1325 (2004).Google Scholar
Jönsson, J., Sjöberg, S., and Lövgren, L.: Adsorption of Cu(II) to schwertmannite and goethite in presence of dissolved organic matter. Water Res. 40(5), 969 (2006).Google Scholar
Trivedi, P., Axe, L., and Dyer, J.: Adsorption of metal ions onto goethite: Single-adsorbate and competitive systems. Colloids Surf., A 191(1–2), 107 (2001).Google Scholar
Gao, Y. and Mucci, A.: Individual and competitive adsorption of phosphate and arsenate on goethite in artificial seawater. Chem. Geol. 199(1–2), 91 (2003).Google Scholar
Xu, N., Christodoulatos, C., and Braida, W.: Modeling the competitive effect of phosphate, sulfate, silicate, and tungstate anions on the adsorption of molybdate onto goethite. Chemosphere 64(8), 1325 (2006).Google Scholar
Yang, L., Hu, C., Nie, Y., and Qu, J.: Surface acidity and reactivity of β-FeOOH/Al2O3 for pharmaceuticals degradation with ozone: In situ ATR-FTIR studies. Appl. Catal., B 97(3–4), 340 (2010).Google Scholar
Kosmulski, M., Durand-Vidal, S., Maczka, E., and Rosenholm, J.B.: Morphology of synthetic goethite particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 271(2), 261 (2004).Google Scholar
Prélot, B., Villiéras, F., Pelletier, M., Gérard, G., Gaboriaud, F., Ehrhardt, J., Perrone, J., Fedoroff, M., Jeanjean, J., Lefèvre, G., Mazerolles, L., Pastol, J., Rouchaud, J., and Lindecker, C.: Morphology and surface heterogeneities in synthetic goethites. J Colloid Interface Sci. 261(2), 244 (2003).Google Scholar
Zhao, X.S. and Lu, G.Q.: Modification of MCM-41 by surface silylation with trimethylchlorosilane and adsorption study. J. Phys. Chem. B 102(9), 1556 (1998).Google Scholar
Tangpasuthadol, V., Pongchaisirikul, N., and Hoven, V.P.: Surface modification of chitosan films. Effects of hydrophobicity on protein adsorption. Carbohydr. Res. 338(9), 937 (2003).Google Scholar
Choi, H., Jung, W., Cho, J., Ryu, B., Yang, J., and Baek, K.: Adsorption of Cr (VI) onto cationic surfactant-modified activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 166(2), 642 (2009).Google Scholar
Silva, J., Mello, J.W.V., Gasparon, M., Abrahão, W.A.P., Ciminelli, V.S.T., and Jong, T.: The role of Al-goethites on arsenate mobility. Water Res. 44(19), 5684 (2010).Google Scholar
Mohapatra, M., Anand, S., Das, R.P., Upadhyay, C., and Verma, H.C.: Preparation and characterization of Cu(II), Ni(II) or Co(II) ion-doped goethite samples and their conversion to magnetite in NH3–FeSO4–H2O medium. Hydrometallurgy 66(1–3), 125 (2002).Google Scholar
Mohapatra, M., Rout, K., and Anand, S.: Synthesis of Mg(II) doped goethite and its cation sorption behaviour. J. Hazard. Mater. 171(1–3), 417 (2009).Google Scholar
Alvarez, M., Rueda, E.H., and Sileo, E.E.: Structural characterization and chemical reactivity of synthetic Mn-goethites and hematites. Chem. Geol. 231(4), 288 (2006).Google Scholar
Tufo, A.E., Sileo, E.E., and Morando, P.J.: Release of metals from synthetic Cr-goethites under acidic and reductive conditions: Effect of aging and composition. Appl. Clay Sci. 58, 88 (2012).Google Scholar
Wei, C., Qiao, P., and Nan, Z.: Size-controlled synthesis of rod-like α-FeOOH nanostructure. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 32(6), 1524 (2012).Google Scholar
Rădiţoiu, V., Diamandescu, L., Cosmin Corobea, M., Rădiţoiu, A., Popescu-Pogrion, N., and Andi Nicolae, C.: A facile hydrothermal route for the synthesis of α-FeOOH with controlled morphology. J. Cryst. Growth 348(1), 40 (2012).Google Scholar
Geng, F., Zhao, Z., Cong, H., Geng, J., and Cheng, H.: An environment-friendly microemulsion approach to α-FeOOH nanorods at room temperature. Mater. Res. Bull. 41(12), 2238 (2006).Google Scholar
Xie, J., Meng, W., Wu, D., Zhang, Z., and Kong, H.: Removal of organic pollutants by surfactant modified zeolite: Comparison between ionizable phenolic compounds and non-ionizable organic compounds. J. Hazard. Mater. 231–232, 57 (2012).Google Scholar
Yuan, Z. and Su, B.: Surfactant-assisted nanoparticle assembly of mesoporous β-FeOOH (akaganeite). Chem. Phys. Lett. 381(5–6), 710 (2003).Google Scholar
Yuan, Z., Ren, T., and Su, B.: Surfactant mediated nanoparticle assembly of catalytic mesoporous crystalline iron oxide materials. Catal. Today 93–95, 743 (2004).Google Scholar
Ristić, M., Musić, S., and Godec, M.: Properties of γ-FeOOH, α-FeOOH and α-Fe2O3 particles precipitated by hydrolysis of Fe3+ ions in perchlorate containing aqueous solutions. J. Alloys Compd. 417(1–2), 292 (2006).Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Lin, J., and Zhan, Y.: Adsorption of Congo red from aqueous solution on surfactant-modified zeolites with different coverage types: Behavior and mechanism. Sep. Sci. Technol. 48(3), 2036 (2013).Google Scholar
Chen, H., Zhao, J., Wu, J., and Dai, G.: Isotherm, thermodynamic, kinetics and adsorption mechanism studies of methyl orange by surfactant modified silkworm exuviae. J. Hazard. Mater. 192(1), 246 (2011).Google Scholar
Ding, C. and Shang, C.: Mechanisms controlling adsorption of natural organic matter on surfactant-modified iron oxide-coated sand. Water Res. 44(12), 3651 (2010).Google Scholar
Nadeem, M., Shabbir, M., Abdullah, M.A., Shah, S.S., and McKay, G.: Sorption of cadmium from aqueous solution by surfactant-modified carbon adsorbents. Chem. Eng. J. 148(2), 365 (2009).Google Scholar
Nadeem, M., Mahmood, A., Shahid, S.A., Shah, S.S., Khalid, A.M., and McKay, G.: Sorption of lead from aqueous solution by chemically modified carbon adsorbents. J. Hazard. Mater. 138(3), 604 (2006).Google Scholar
Armagan, B., Turan, M., and Karadag, D.: Adsorption of different reactive dyes onto surfactant-modified zeolite: Kinetic and equilibrium modeling. Presented at International Conference on Environment: Survival and Sustainability; Environmental Concerns in the 21st Century, Berlin, 2011.Google Scholar
Fan, L., Luo, C., Li, X., Lu, F., Qiu, H., and Sun, M.: Fabrication of novel magnetic chitosan grafted with graphene oxide to enhance adsorption properties for methyl blue. J. Hazard. Mater. 215–216, 272 (2012).Google Scholar
Theydan, S.K. and Ahmed, M.J.: Adsorption of methylene blue onto biomass-based activated carbon by FeCl3 activation: Equilibrium, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 97, 116 (2012).Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Zhang, P., Wu, Z., Zhang, L., Zeng, G., and Zhou, C.: Adsorption of methylene blue onto humic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Colloids Surf., A 435, 85 (2013).Google Scholar
An, Z., Zhang, J., and Pan, S.: Synthesis and controlled assembly of α-FeOOH and α-Fe2O3 nanobelt arrays on hollow glass spheres. Mater. Res. Bull. 47(12), 3976 (2012).Google Scholar
Krehula, S. and Musić, S.: Influence of aging in an alkaline medium on the microstructural properties of α-FeOOH. J. Cryst. Growth 310(2), 513 (2008).Google Scholar
Ou, P., Xu, G., Ren, Z., Hou, X., and Han, G.: Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of uniform α-FeOOH nanowires in high yield. Mater. Lett. 62(6–7), 914 (2008).Google Scholar
Geng, F., Zhao, Z., Geng, J., Cong, H., and Cheng, H.: A simple and low-temperature hydrothermal route for the synthesis of tubular α-FeOOH. Mater. Lett. 61(26), 4794 (2007).Google Scholar
Krehula, S., Popović, S., and Musić, S.: Synthesis of acicular α-FeOOH particles at a very high pH. Mater. Lett. 54(2), 108 (2002).Google Scholar
Krehula, S. and Musić, S.: Influence of copper ions on the precipitation of goethite and hematite in highly alkaline media. J. Mol. Struct. 834–836, 154 (2007).Google Scholar
Mayant, C., Grambow, B., Abdelouas, A., Ribet, S., and Leclercq, S.: Surface site density, silicic acid retention and transport properties of compacted magnetite powder. Phys. Chem. Earth 33(14–16), 991 (2008).Google Scholar
Shao, D., Xu, D., Wang, S., Fang, Q., Wu, W., Dong, Y., and Wang, X.: Modeling of radionickel sorption on MX-80 bentonite as a function of pH and ionic strength. Sci. China, Ser. B Chem. 52(3), 362 (2009).Google Scholar
Sahai, N. and Sverjensky, D.A.: Evaluation of internally consistent parameters for the triple-layer model by the systematic analysis of oxide surface titration data. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 61(14), 2801 (1997).Google Scholar
Yates, D.E., Grieser, F., Cooper, R., and Healy, T.W.: Tritium exchange studies on metal oxide colloidal dispersions. Aust. J. Chem. 30(8), 1655 (1977).Google Scholar
Rustad, J.R., Felmy, A.R., and Hay, B.P.: Molecular statics calculations of proton binding to goethite surfaces: A new approach to estimation of stability constants for multisite surface complexation models. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60(9), 1563 (1996).Google Scholar
Vučurović, V.M., Razmovski, R.N., and Tekić, M.N.: Methylene blue (cationic dye) adsorption onto sugar beet pulp: Equilibrium isotherm and kinetic studies. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 43(1), 108 (2012).Google Scholar
Ma, J., Jia, Y., Jing, Y., Yao, Y., and Sun, J.: Kinetics and thermodynamics of methylene blue adsorption by cobalt-hectorite composite. Dyes Pigm. 93(1–3), 1441 (2012).Google Scholar
Khraisheh, M., Al-Ghouti, M.A., Allen, S.J., and Ahmad, M.: The effect of pH, temperature, and molecular size on the removal of dyes from textile effluent using manganese oxides-modified diatomite. Water Environ. Res. 76(7), 2655 (2004).Google Scholar
Al-Ghouti, M.A., Li, J., Salamh, Y., Al-Laqtah, N., Walker, G., and Ahmad, M.N.M.: Adsorption mechanisms of removing heavy metals and dyes from aqueous solution using date pits solid adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 176(1–3), 510 (2010).Google Scholar