Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:32:42.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress–strain behaviors of Ti-based bulk metallic glass and their nanostructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

T. Ohkubo*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan
D. Nagahama
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-00471, Japan
T. Mukai
Affiliation:
National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan
K. Hono
Affiliation:
National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan; and Graduate School of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the compression stress–strain behaviors of Ti40Zr25Cu12Ni3Be20 bulk metallic glasses prepared by Cu mold casting from various melt temperatures. Plastic strain was found to vary sensitively on the temperature of melts and subsequent annealing conditions. To understand the origin of the plasticity change, the microstructures were characterized using transmission electron microscopy and a laser-assisted three-dimensional atom probe. The fully amorphous sample cast from 1273 K showed 0.6% plastic strain, and it was enhanced to 1.3% after isothermal annealing at 573 K. The sample cast from 1423 K showed 3.0% plastic strain, from which the presence of nanocrystals with a volume fraction of about 12% was confirmed. The sample cast from a higher temperature (1573 K) contained a larger fraction of crystals, which showed limited plastic strain. The effect of the volume fraction of the nanocrystals on the plasticity of bulk metallic glasses is discussed based on the experimental results.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Inoue, A.: Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 48, 279 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L.: Microstructure controlled shear band pattern formation and enhanced plasticity of bulk metallic glasses containing in situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 (2000).Google Scholar
3Inoue, A., Zhang, W., Zhang, T., and Kurosaka, K.: High-strength Cu-based bulk glassy alloys in Cu–Zr–Ti and Cu–Hf–Ti ternary systems. Acta Mater. 49, 2645 (2001).Google Scholar
4Jiang, J.Z., Saida, J., Kato, H., Ohsuna, T., and Inoue, A.: Is Cu60Ti10Zr30 a bulk glass-forming alloy? Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4041 (2003).Google Scholar
5Inoue, A., Zhang, W., and Saida, J.: Synthesis and fundamental properties of Cu-based bulk glassy alloys in binary and multi-component systems. Mater. Trans. 45, 1153 (2004).Google Scholar
6Nagahama, D., Ohkubo, T., Mukai, T., and Hono, K.: Characterization of nanocrystal dispersed Cu60Zr30Ti10 metallic glass. Mater. Trans. 46, 1264 (2005).Google Scholar
7Calin, M., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Improved mechanical behavior of Cu–Ti-based bulk metallic glass by in situ formation of nanoscale precipitates. Scripta Mater. 48, 653 (2003).Google Scholar
8Inoue, A., Zhang, T., Saida, J., Matsushita, M., Chen, M.W., and Sakurai, T.: High strength and good ductility of bulk quasicrystalline base alloys in Zr65Al7.5Ni10Cu17.5−xPdx system. Mater. Trans., JIM 40, 1137 (1999).Google Scholar
9Park, J.M., Chang, H.J., Han, K.H., Kim, W.T., and Kim, D.H.: Enhancement of plasticity in Ti-rich Ti–Zr–Be–Cu–Ni bulk metallic glasses. Scripta Mater. 53, 1 (2005).Google Scholar
10Leonhard, A., Xing, L.Q., Heilmaier, M., Gebert, A., Eckert, J., and Schultz, L.: Effect of crystalline precipitations on the mechanical behavior of bulk glass forming Zr-based alloys. Nanostruct. Mater. 10, 805 (1998).Google Scholar
11Wright, W.J., Schwarz, R.B., and Nix, W.D.: Localized heating during serrated plastic flow in bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 319–321, 229 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Guo, F., Wang, H-J., Poon, S.J., and Shiflet, G.J.: Ductile titanium-based glassy alloy ingots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 091907 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Blavette, D., Deconihout, B., Bostel, A., Sarrau, J.M., Bouet, M., and Menad, A.: The tomographic atom probe: A quantitative three-dimensional nanoanalytical instrument on an atomic scale. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 2911 (1993).Google Scholar
14Lewandowski, J.J., Wang, W.H., and Greer, A.L.: Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philos. Mag. Lett. 85, 77 (2005).Google Scholar
15Schroers, J. and Johnson, W.L.: Ductile bulk metallic glass. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 255506 (2004).Google Scholar
16Zallen, R.: The Physics of Amorphous Solids (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Basu, J., Nagendra, N., Li, Y., and Ramamurty, U.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of a partially crystallized La-based bulk metallic glass. Philos. Mag. 83, 1747 (2003).Google Scholar