Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:38:43.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spontaneous solution-sol-gel process for preparing tin oxide monolith

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Nae-Lih Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Lih-Fu Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Ya-Chin Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Shu-Jiuan Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

A sol-gel process for preparing SnO2 monolith of high specific surface area and transparency from chloride solution is described. Without introducing any alkaline precipitating reagent to induce condensation, this new process employs tin chloride (or its hydrate), water, and, optionally, alcohols as the only process reagents. Spontaneous solution-to-sol and sol-to-gel transitions take place upon mixing these reagents under appropriate conditions, and the entire transition processes are carried out under acidic conditions (typically pH ≤ 4.0). The rate of condensation has been found to increase with decreasing SnCl4 concentration, which corresponds to decreasing solution acidity, and with increasing temperature. For fixed starting salt concentration and temperature, there exists an optimum amount of ethanol addition for the fastest condensation. Good performance of thus derived SnO2 monolith has been demonstrated in two applications, including catalytic oxidation and solid-state gas-sensing for carbon monoxide.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Fuller, M. J. and Warwick, M. E., J. Catal. 29, 441 (1973)Google Scholar
2.Sala, F. and Trifiro, F., J. Catal. 34, 68 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Harrison, P. G. and Harris, P. J. F., U.S. Patent 5,051,393 (1991).Google Scholar
4.Seiyama, T., Kato, A., Fujishi, K., and Nagatani, M., Anal. Chem. 34, 1502 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Takahata, K., in Chemical Sensor Technology, edited by Seiyama, T. (Kodansha, Tokyo, and Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988), Vol. 1, p. 39.Google Scholar
6.Camanzi, A. and Sberveglierri, G., U.S. Patent 5,185,130 (1993).Google Scholar
7.Coutts, T. J., Active and Passive Thin Film Devices (Academic Press, London, 1978).Google Scholar
8.Manifacier, J. C., Thin Solid Films 90, 297 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yoldas, B. E., J. Mater. Sci. 10, 1856 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Brinker, C. J. and Scherer, G. W., Sol-Gel Science (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1990).Google Scholar
11.Bradley, D. C., Caldwell, E. V., and Wardlaw, W., J. Chem. Sci., 4775 (1957).Google Scholar
12.Hampden-Smith, M. J., Wark, T., and Brinker, C. J., Coordination Chemistry Reviews 112, 81 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kistler, S. S., J. Phys. Chem. 36, 52 (1932).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Giesekke, E. W., Gutowsky, H. S., Kirrov, P., and Laitinen, H. A., Inorg. Chem. 6, 1294 (1967).Google Scholar
15.Hiratsuka, R. S., Pulcinelli, S. H., and Santilli, C. V., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 121, 76 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Presecatan, R. T., Pulcinelli, S. H., and Santilli, C. V., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 147/148, 340 (1992).Google Scholar
17.Heiland, G. and Kohl, D., in Chemical Sensor Technology, edited by Seiyama, T. (Kodansha, Tokyo, and Elsevier, Amsterdan, 1988), Vol. 1, p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Grisel, A. and Demarne, V., in Chemical Sensor Technology, edited by Seiyama, T. (Kodansha, Tokyo, and Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988), Vol. 2, p. 43.Google Scholar