Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:38:08.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation and experimental investigation of strain rate impact on martensitic transformation in 304L steel through dome test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2016

Hojjatollah Fathi ,
Esmaeil Emadoddin  and
Hamid Reza Mohammadian Semnani
Hojjatollah Fathi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Esmaeil Emadoddin*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
Hamid Reza Mohammadian Semnani
Affiliation:
Faculty of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the effect of strain rate on volume fraction of martensite (VFM) in 304L austenitic stainless steel through dome test. Findings of this study show that martensitic transformation affects the deformation mode and formability of this material. Three strain rates are applied by controlling forming punch speed to conduct the stretching experiments and VFM is measured using magnetic saturation method. Results of the present study reveal that maximum VFM of 56% forms at the pole at low strain rates, whereas VFM of 47% is seen at high strain rates, and transforms in the region close to the flange. It is noted that blanks show good formability under low strain rate and poor formability at high strain rates. The relationship between VFM and strain rate, strain, percentage of shell reduction, equivalent of stress, and triaxiality are discussed. The experimental procedure is simulated and predicted findings show good agreement with the experimental results.

Keywords

phase transformationmagnetic propertiesfracturestrength
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 14 , 28 July 2016 , pp. 2136 - 2146
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Choi, J., Fukuda, T., and Kakeshita, T.: Effect of magnetic field on isothermal martensitic transformation in a sensitized SUS304 austenitic stainless steel. J. Alloys. Compd. 577S, S605 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N., Wang, Y.D., Liu, W.J., An, Z.N., Liu, J.P., Su, R., Li, J., and Liaw, P.K.: In situ x-ray microdiffraction study of deformation-induced phase transformation in 304 austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 64, 12 (2014).Google Scholar
Moallemi, M., Zarei-Hanzaki, A., and Mirzaei, A.: On the stacking fault energy evaluation and deformation mechanism of Sanicro-28 super-austenitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 24(6), 2335 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. and Kumar, R.: Dissimilar joining between austenitic and duplex stainless steel in double-shielded GMAW: A comparative study. Mater. Manuf. Processes 31, 300 (2016).Google Scholar
Kim, Y.H., Kim, J.H., Hwang, T.H., Lee, J.Y., and Kang, C.Y.: Effect of austenite on mechanical properties in high manganese austenitic stainless steel with two phase of martensite and austenite. Met. Mater. Int. 21(3), 485 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Jeong, Y., Clausen, B., Liu, Y., McCabe, R.J., Barlat, F., and Tome, C.N.: Effect of martensitic phase transformation on the behavior of 304 austenitic stainless steel under tension. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 649, 174 (2016).Google Scholar
Choi, J.Y., Lee, J., Lee, K., Koh, J.Y., Cho, J.H., Han, H.N., and Park, K.T.: Effects of the strain rate on the tensile properties of aTRIP-aided duplex stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A A666, 280 (2016).Google Scholar
Davut, K. and Zaefferer, S.: The effect of texture on the stability of retained austenite in Al-alloyed TRIP steels. MRS Proc. 1296, mrsf10-1296-o01-04 (2011).Google Scholar
Snezhnoi, G.V.: Magnetic state of austenite near the true deformation martensitic point of a chromium–nickel austenitic steel. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 111(6), 573 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausild, P., Davydov, V., Drahokoupil, J., Landa, M., and Pilvin, P.: Characterization of strain-induced martensitic transformation in a metastable austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Des. 31, 1821 (2010).Google Scholar
Olson, G.B. and Cohen, M.: A mechanism for the strain-induced nucleation of martensitic transformations. J. Less-Common Met. 28, 107 (1972).Google Scholar
Olson, G.B. and Cohen, M.: Kinetics of nucleation strain-induced martensitic. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 6A, 791 (1975).Google Scholar
Yonezawa, T., Suzuki, K., Ooki, S., and Hashimoto, A.: The effect of chemical composition and heat treatment conditions on stacking fault energy for Fe–Cr–Ni austenitic stainless steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44A, 5884 (2013).Google Scholar
Andrade-Campos, A., Teixeira-Dias, F., Krupp, U., Barlat, F., Rauch, E.F., and Gracio, J.J.: Effect of strain rate, adiabatic heating and phase transformation phenomena on the mechanical behaviour of stainless steel. Strain 46, 283 (2010).Google Scholar
Stringfellow, R.G., Parks, D.M., and Olson, G.B.: A constitutive model for transformation plasticity accompanying strain-induced martensitic transformations in metastable austenitic steels. Acta Metall. Mater. 40(7), 1703 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaira, M., Guy, P., Courbon, J., and Godin, N.: Monitoring of martensitic transformation in austenitic stainless steel 304 L by eddy currents. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 21, 112 (2010).Google Scholar
Rouziere, S., Bazin, D., and Daudon, M.: In-lab x-ray fluorescence and diffraction techniques for pathological calcifications. C. R. Chim, doi:10.1016/j.crci.2015.05.013 (2016).Google Scholar
Shirdel, M., Mirzadeh, H., and Parsa, M.H.: Estimation of the kinetics of martensitic transformation in austenitic stainless steels by conventional and novel approaches. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 624, 256 (2015).Google Scholar
Lo, K.H., Zeng, D., and Kwok, C.T.: Effects of sensitisation-induced martensitic transformation on the tensile behaviour of 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 1003 (2011).Google Scholar
Isakov, M., Hiermaier, S., and Kuokkala, V.: Effect of strain rate on the martensitic transformation during plastic deformation of an austenitic stainless steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46A, 2352 (2015).Google Scholar
Li, X., Chen, J., Ye, L., Ding, W., and Song, P.: Influence of strain rate on tensile characteristics of sus304 metastable austenitic stainless steel. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 26(6), 657 (2013).Google Scholar
Yeddu, H.K., Lookman, T., and Saxena, A.: Strain-induced martensitic transformation in stainless steels: A three-dimensional phase-field study. Acta Mater. 61, 6972 (2013).Google Scholar
Iwamoto, T., Tsuta, T., and Tomita, Y.: Investigation on deformation mode dependence of strain-induced martensitic transformation in trip steels and modelling of transformation kinetics. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 40, 173 (1998).Google Scholar
Perdahcıoglu, E.S., Geijselaers, H.J.M., and Huetink, J.: Influence of stress state and strain path on deformation induced martensitic transformations. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 481–482, 727 (2008).Google Scholar
Beese, A.M. and Mohr, D.: Effect of stress triaxiality and Lode angle on the kinetics of strain-induced austenite-to-martensite transformation. Acta Mater. 59, 2589 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM E2218: Standard test method for determining forming limit curves. American Society for Testing and Material, 5 (2002).Google Scholar
Safdarian, R., Jorge, R.M.N., Santos, A.D., Naeini, H.M., and Parente, M.P.L.: A comparative study of forming limit diagram prediction of tailor welded blanks. Int. J. Mater. Form. 8, 293 (2015).Google Scholar
Davis, J.R., Semiatin, S.L., and the American Society for Metals: ASM Metals Handbook, Vol. 14: Forming and Forging (ASM International, Materials Park, 1988); p. 1963.Google Scholar
Talonen, J., Aspegren, P., and Hanninen, H.: Comparison of different methods for measuring strain induced α-martensite content in austenitic steels. Mater. Sci. Technol. 20, 1506 (2004).Google Scholar
Smaga, M., Walther, F., and Eifler, D.: Deformation-induced martensitic transformation in metastable austenitic steels. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 483–484, 394 (2008).Google Scholar
Beese, A.M. and Mohr, D.: Identification of the direction-dependency of the martensitic transformation in stainless steel using in situ magnetic permeability measurements. Exp. Mech. 51, 667 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM E 8M: Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. American Society for Testing and Material, (2000).Google Scholar
Post, J., Datta, K., and Beyer, J.: A macroscopic constitutive model for a metastable austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 485, 290 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, California, 424(MAT) (2007).Google Scholar
Hausild, P., Kolarík, K., and Karlík, M.: Characterization of strain-induced martensitic transformation in A301 stainless steel by Barkhausen noise measurement. Mater. Des. 44, 548 (2013).Google Scholar
Curtze, S., Kuokkala, V.T., Hokka, M., and Peura, P.: Deformation behavior of TRIP and DP steels in tension at different temperatures over a wide range of strain rates. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 507, 124 (2009).Google Scholar
Ueji, R., Takagi, Y., Tsuchida, N., and Shinagawa, K.: Crystallographic orientation dependence of ε martensite transformation during tensile deformation of polycrystalline 30% Mn austenitic steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 576, 14 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourki, Z., Bargui, H., and Sidhom, H.: The kinetic of induced martensitic formation and its effect on forming limit curves in the AISI 304 stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 166, 330 (2005).Google Scholar
Kim, H., Lee, J., Barlat, F., Kim, D., and Lee, M.: Experiment and modeling to investigate the effect of stress state, strain and temperature on martensitic phase transformation in TRIP-assisted steel. Acta Mater. 97, 435 (2015).Google Scholar
Han, H.N., Lee, C.G., Suh, D.W., and Kim, S.J.: A microstructure-based analysis for transformation induced plasticity and mechanically induced martensitic transformation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 485, 224 (2008).Google Scholar
Talonen, J., Nenonen, P., Pape, G., and Hanninen, H.: Effect of strain rate on the strain-induced-martensite transformation and mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 36A, 421 (2005).Google Scholar
Dan, W.J., Zhang, W.G., Li, S.H., and Lin, Z.Q.: A model for strain-induced martensitic transformation of TRIP steel with strain rate. Comput. Mater. Sci. 40, 101 (2007).Google Scholar
Hedstrom, P., Lindgren, L.E., Almer, J., Lienert, U., Bernier, J., Terner, M., and Oden, M.: Load partitioning and strain-induced martensite formation during tensile loading of a metastable austenitic stainless steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 48, 1039 (2009).Google Scholar
Beese, A.M. and Mohr, D.: Anisotropic plasticity model coupled with Lode angle dependent strain-induced transformation kinetics law. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 60, 1922 (2012).Google Scholar