Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:24:36.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Processing and characterization of lead magnesium tantalate ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Mehmet A. Akbas
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3231 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104–6272
Peter K. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 3231 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104–6272
Get access

Abstract

Using a processing route that employed platinum crucibles, single phase ceramics of Pb(Mg1/3Ta2/3)O3 (PMT) relaxor ferroelectrics were prepared with densities greater than 95% of their theoretical value. The improvements in the sintering characteristics of this system that result from this route were reflected by the dielectric properties, at 182 K, which are similar to those reported for single crystal PMT. Contrast originating from nanosized polar clusters was evident in dark-field TEM images collected from the PMT ceramics at room temperature and showed little change upon cooling through the permittivity maximum. The electron diffraction patterns contained weak superlattice reflections at (h ± 1/2, k ± 1/2, l ± 1/2) that originate from a 1: 1 ordering of the B-site cations. High resolution imaging indicated that the length scale of the chemical ordering in PMT is essentially identical to niobate relaxors such as PMN, with the 1–2 nm ordered domains being surrounded by a disordered matrix.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Cross, L. E., Ferroelectrics 76, 241 (1989).Google Scholar
2.Hilton, L. D., Barber, D. J., Randall, A., and Shrout, T. R., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3461 (1990).Google Scholar
3.Randall, C. A. and Bhalla, A. S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, 327 (1990).Google Scholar
4.Harmer, M. P., Chen, J., Peng, P., Chan, H. M., and Smyth, D. M., Ferroelectrics 97, 263 (1989).Google Scholar
5.de Mathan, N., Husson, E., Gaucher, P., and Morell, A., Mater. Res. Bull. 25, 427 (1990).Google Scholar
6.Bokov, V. A. and Myl'nikova, I. E., Sov. Phys. Solid State 2, 2428 (1961).Google Scholar
7.Lu, Z. G., Flicoteaux, C., and Calvarin, G., Mater. Res. Bull. 3 (5), 445 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Smolenskii, G. A., Krainik, N. N., Berezhnoi, A. A., and Myl'nikova, I. E., Sov. Phys. Solid State 10, 2105 (1969).Google Scholar
9.Agranovskaya, A. I., Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR 4, 1271 (1960).Google Scholar
10.Swartz, S. and Shrout, T., Mater. Res. Bull. 17, 1245 (1982).Google Scholar
11.Akbas, M. A., Reaney, I. M., and Lee, W. E., J. Mater. Res. 11, 2293 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Chu, F., Reaney, I. M., and Setter, N., Ferroelectrics 151, 343 (1994).Google Scholar
13.Dai, X., Xu, Z., and Viehland, D., Philos. Mag. B 70 (1), 93 (1994).Google Scholar
14.Akbas, M. A., Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, U.K. (1995).Google Scholar
15.Randall, C. A., Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Essex, Essex, U.K. (1987).Google Scholar
16.Park, K., Salamanca-Riba, L., Wutting, M., and Viehland, D., J. Mater. Sci. 29, 1284 (1994).Google Scholar
17.Chen, J., Chen, H., and Harmer, M. P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72 (4), 593 (1989).Google Scholar
18.Boulesteix, C., Varnier, F., Llebaria, A., and Husson, E., J. Solid State Chem. 108, 141 (1994).Google Scholar
19.Viehland, D., Kim, N., Xu, Z., and Payne, D. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (9), 2481 (1995).Google Scholar
20.Davies, P. K., Tong, J., and Negas, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80 (7), 1727 (1997).Google Scholar
21.Akbas, M. A. and Davies, P. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (1997, in press).Google Scholar