Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:37:43.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparation and characterization of monosized Cu–Sn spherical alloy particles by pulsated orifice ejection method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2018

Ying-yan Hu ,
Wen Yue ,
Jian-qiang Li ,
Wei Dong ,
Can Li ,
Bing-qian Ma ,
Chao Liu  and
Jian-jun Han
Ying-yan Hu*
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China; and National Engineering Laboratory for Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Wen Yue
Affiliation:
School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
Jian-qiang Li*
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory for Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; and School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Wei Dong
Affiliation:
School of Material Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Can Li
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory for Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; and School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Bing-qian Ma
Affiliation:
National Engineering Laboratory for Hydrometallurgical Cleaner Production Technology, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Chao Liu
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Jian-jun Han
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: [email protected]
b)e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Monosized spherical Cu–20% Sn (wt%) alloy particles with diameter ranging from 70.6 to 334.0 μm were prepared by the pulsated orifice ejection method (termed “POEM”). Fully dense without pores and bulk inclusions, the cross-sectional micrographs of the spherical alloy particles indicate an even distribution of Cu and Sn. These spherical Cu–Sn alloy particles exhibit a good spherical shape and a narrow size distribution, suggesting that the liquid Cu–Sn alloy can completely break the balance between the surface tension and the liquid static pressure in the crucible micropores and accurately control the volume of the droplets. Furthermore, the cooling rate of spherical Cu–20% Sn alloy particles is estimated by a Newton’s cooling model. The cooling rate of the Cu–20% Sn alloy particle decreases gradually with the particle diameter increasing. Smaller particles have higher cooling rates and when the particle diameter is less than 70 μm, the cooling rate of particles can reach more than 3.3 × 104 K/s. The secondary dendrite arm spacing has strong dependence on particle diameter which increases gradually with the increase of particle diameter. The results demonstrate that POEM is an effective route for fabrication of high-quality monosized Cu–20% Sn alloy particles.

Keywords

monosized Cu–Sn particlesphericitypulsated orifice ejection methodstructuralcooling ratesecondary dendrite arm spacing
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 18 , 28 September 2018 , pp. 2835 - 2843
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lei, C., Huang, H., Cheng, Z., Tang, S., and Du, Y.: Mono-disperse spherical Cu–Zn powder fabricated via the low wettability of liquid/solid interface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 167, 357 (2015).Google Scholar
Lu, K. and Reynolds, W.T.: 3DP process for fine mesh structure printing. Powder Technol. 11, 187 (2008).Google Scholar
Hassan, I.B., Lafforgue, C., Ayadi, A., and Schmitz, P.: In situ 3D characterization of monodispersed spherical particle deposition on microsieve using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 283, 454 (2014).Google Scholar
Pu, W., He, X., Ren, J., Wan, C., and Jiang, C.: Electrodeposition of Sn–Cu alloy anodes for lithium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 4140, 50 (2005).Google Scholar
Lu, W., Wang, W., Jiang, H., Zuo, G., Pan, B., Xu, W., Chu, D., Hu, J., and Qi, J.: Investigation of wetting property between liquid lead lithium alloy and several structural materials for Chinese DEMO reactor. J. Nucl. Mater. 303, 494 (2017).Google Scholar
Dai, H., Wang, S., Zhu, G., and Zeng, P.: A new route for manufacturing monodispersed spherical copper particles for electronic applications. Mater. Mater. Lett. 173, 118 (2014).Google Scholar
Lei, C., Huang, H., Huang, Y., Cheng, Z., Tang, S., and Du, Y.: In situ de-wetting assisted fabrication of spherical Cu–Sn alloy powder via the reduction of mixture metallic oxides. Powder Technol. 356, 301 (2016).Google Scholar
Yakutik, I.M., Shevchenko, G.P., and Rakhmanov, S.K.: The formation of monodisperse spherical silver particles. Colloids Surf., A 175, 242 (2004).Google Scholar
Miura, A., Dong, W., Fukue, M., Yodoshi, N., Takagi, K., and Kawasaki, A.: Preparation of Fe-based monodisperse spherical particles with fully glassy phase. J. Alloys Compd. 5581, 509 (2011).Google Scholar
Lagutkin, S., Achelis, L., Sheikhaliev, S., Uhlenwinkel, V., and Srivastava, V.: Atomization process for metal powder. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 1, 383 (2004).Google Scholar
Rashad, M., Pan, F., and Asif, M.: Room temperature mechanical properties of Mg–Cu–Al alloys synthesized using powder metallurgy method. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 129, 644 (2015).Google Scholar
Masuda, S., Takagi, K., Dong, W., Yamanaka, K., and Kawasaki, A.: Solidification behavior of falling germanium droplets produced by pulsated orifice ejection method. J. Cryst. Growth 2915, 310 (2008).Google Scholar
Cheng, Z., Lei, C., Huang, H., Tang, S., and Du, Y.: The formation of ultrafine spherical metal powders using a low wettability strategy of solid–liquid interface. Mater. Des. 324, 97 (2016).Google Scholar
Haq, I.U., Akhtar, K., and Malook, K.: Synthesis and characterization of monodispersed copper oxide and their precursor powder. Mater. Res. Bull. 121, 57 (2014).Google Scholar
Tongsri, R., Tosangthum, N., Yotkaew, T., Muthitamongkol, P., Sri-on, A., and Patakham, U.: Characterization of liquid-phase sintered materials produced from mechanically alloyed Cu + Sn powder compacts. Mater. Charact. 52, 113 (2016).Google Scholar
Novakovic, R., Lanata, T., Delsante, S., and Borzone, G.: Interfacial reactions in the Sb–Sn/(Cu, Ni) systems: Wetting experiments. Mater. Chem. Phys. 458, 137 (2012).Google Scholar
Lai, Q., Zhang, L., Chen, C., and Shang, J.K.: Tunable reactive wetting of Sn on microporous Cu layer. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 379, 28 (2012).Google Scholar
Dong, R.F., Cui, Z-D., Zhu, S-L., Xu, X., and Yang, X-J.: Preparation, characterization and mechanical properties of Cu–Sn alloy/graphite composites. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 5194, 45A (2014).Google Scholar
Furtauer, S., Li, D., Cupid, D., and Flandorfer, H.: The Cu–Sn phase diagram, part I: New experimental results. Intermetallics 142, 34 (2013).Google Scholar
Saunders, N. and Miodownik, A.P.: Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams (Springer Nature Press, New York, 1990); p. 278.Google Scholar
Yu, S-P., Wang, M-C., and Hong, M-H.: Formation of intermetallic compounds at eutectic Sn–Zn–Al solder/Cu interface. J. Mater. Res. 76, 16 (2001).Google Scholar
Zhang, Y-S., Zhang, W., Wang, X., and Huo, W-T.: Formation of core–shell network structural titanium–nitrogen alloys with different nitrogen contents. J. Mater. Sci. 7824, 52 (2017).Google Scholar
Battersby, S.E., Cochrane, R.F., and Mullis, A.M.: Microstructural evolution and growth velocity-undercooling relationships in the systems Cu, Cu–O, and Cu–Sn at high undercooling. J. Mater. Sci. 1365, 35 (2000).Google Scholar
Pang, J-F., Xu, Y., Li, X-G., and Chen, Y.: Influence of atomizing gas and cooling rate on solidification characterization of nickel-based superalloy powders. Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 423, 47 (2018).Google Scholar
Yan, N., Wang, W-L., and Wei, B.: Complex phase separation of ternary Co–Cu–Pb alloy under containerlessprocessing condition. J. Alloys Compd. 109, 558 (2013).Google Scholar
Pan, A-G., Wang, J-B., and Zhang, X-J.: Prediction of melting temperature and latent heat for low-melting metal PCMs. Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 874, 45 (2016).Google Scholar