Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:44:10.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Origin of the Simultaneous Improvement of Strength and Plasticity in Ti-based Bulk Metallic Glass Matrix Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Yu Chan Kim*
Affiliation:
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea
Eric Fleury
Affiliation:
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea
Jae-Chul Lee
Affiliation:
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea
Do Hyang Kim
Affiliation:
Center for Non-crystalline Materials, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

W-rich particle-reinforced Ti-based bulk metallic glass (BMG) matrix composites with a compressive strength approaching 3 GPa and a fracture strain of approximately 12% were developed. In contrast to most existing BMG matrix composites, in which the improved ductility was obtained only at the expense of the strength, the composites developed in this study exhibited a significant enhancement in their strength, as well as an improvement in the plasticity. This improvement in the plasticity was attributed to the blocking and circumscription of the shear band propagation, leading to the formation of a large number of shear bands. Using a classical elasticity theory of inclusions, the improvement of the strength was interpreted as resulting from the generation of tensile residual stresses in the matrix due to the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between the W-rich particles and the BMG matrix.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Luborsky, F.E.: Amorphous Metallic Alloys (Butterworths Monographs in Materials, 1983), pp. 187230.Google Scholar
2Conner, R.D., Dandliker, R.B. and Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of tungsten and steel fiber reinforced Zr41.25Ti13.75Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 metallic glass matrix composites. Acta Mater. 46, 6089 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Han, T.K., Kim, S.J., Yang, Y.S., Inoue, A., Kim, Y.H. and Kim, I.B.: Nanocrystallization and high tensile strength of amorphous Zr–Al–Ni–Cu–Ag alloys. Met. Mater Int. 7, 91 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Lee, J.C., Kim, Y.C., Ahn, J.P. and Kim, H.S.: Enhanced plasticity in a bulk amorphous matrix composite: macroscopic and microscopic viewpoint studies. Acta Mater. 53, 129 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Kim, Y.C., Na, J.H., Park, J.M., Kim, D.H., Lee, J.K. and Kim, W.T.: Role of nanometer-scale quasicrystals in improving the mechanical behavior of Ti-based bulk metallic glasses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 3093 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Eckert, J., Seidel, M., Kubler, A., Klement, R. and Schultz, L.: Oxide dispersion strengthened mechanically alloyed amorphous Zr–Al–Cu–Ni composites. Scripta Mater. 38, 595 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Choi-Yim, H., Busch, R., Köster, U. and Johnson, W.L.: Synthesis and characterization of particulate reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 bulk metallic glass composites. Acta Mater. 47, 2455 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P. and Johnson, W.L.: Microstructure controlled shear band pattern formation and enhanced plasticity of bulk metallic glasses containing in-situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Park, E.S., Kang, H.G., Kim, W.T. and Kim, D.H.: The effect of Sn addition on the glass-forming ability of Cu–Ti–Zr–Ni–Si metallic glass alloy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 298, 15 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Peker, A. and Johnson, W.L.: A highly processable metallic glass: Zr41.2Ti13.8Cu12.5Ni10.0Be22.5. Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2342 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Inoue, A., Nishiyama, N. and Matsuda, T.: Preparation of bulk glassy Pd40Ni10Cu30P20 alloy of 40 mm in diameter by water quenching. Mater. Trans. JIM 37, 181 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Inoue, A., Zhang, T. and Takeuchi, A.: Bulk amorphous alloys with high mechanical strength and good soft magnetic properties in Fe–TM–B (TM = IV–VIII group transition metal) system. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 464 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Inoue, A., Koshiba, M., Zhang, T. and Makino, A.: Ferromagnetic Co–Fe–Zr–B amorphous alloys with glass transition and good high-frequency permeability. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 744 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Kim, Y.C., Bae, D.H., Kim, W.T. and Kim, D.H.: Glass forming ability and crystallization behavior of Ti-based amorphous alloys with high specific strength. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 325, 242 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Sung, D.S., Kwon, O.J., Fleury, E., Kim, K.B., Lee, J.C., Kim, D.H. and Kim, Y.C.: Enhancement of the glass forming ability of Cu–Zr–Al alloys by Ag addition. Met. Mater Int. 10, 575 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Kim, W.B., Ye, B.J. and Yi, S.: Amorphous phase formation in a Ni–Zr–Al–Y alloy system. Met. Mater. Int. 10, 1 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Lide, D.R.: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press 1995–1996).Google Scholar
18Arsenault, R.J. and Taya, M.: Thermal residual stress in metal matrix composite. Acta Metall. 35, 651 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Clyne, T.W. and Withers, P.J.: An Introduction to Metal Matrix Composites (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1993), pp. 44116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Mura, T.: Micromechanics of Defects in Solids (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1987), p. 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar