Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:38:28.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nano-JKR force curve method overcomes challenges of surface detection and adhesion for nanoindentation of a compliant polymer in air and water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2011

Donna M. Ebenstein
Donna M. Ebenstein*
Affiliation:
Biomedical Engineering Department, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania 17837
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

There are many challenges associated with adapting traditional nanoindentation methods to the study of compliant, hydrated biomaterials. These include issues related to surface detection, tip–sample adhesion, and fluid interactions. This study demonstrates that the nano-Johnson–Kendall–Roberts (JKR) force curve method can be used effectively in both air and water to overcome the challenges of surface detection and adhesion for nanoindentation of a compliant polymer. Indents were performed on poly(dimethyl siloxane) samples in air, water, and a detergent solution, with detergent used to reduce interfacial forces and provide baseline modulus measurements. The results demonstrated that errors due to adhesion dominated errors due to surface detection or fluid interactions and that JKR modeling could compensate for errors due to adhesion. Several JKR curve-fitting techniques were also evaluated, and all were found to result in moduli within 10% of the baseline moduli of the materials, demonstrating the robustness of this technique.

Keywords

NanoindentationAdhesionBiomaterial
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 26 , Issue 8 , 28 April 2011 , pp. 1026 - 1035
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ebenstein, D.M. and Pruitt, L.A.: Nanoindentation of biological materials. Nano Today 1, 26 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Angker, L. and Swain, M.V.: Nanoindentation: Application to dental hard tissue investigations. J. Mater. Res. 21, 1893 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lewis, G. and Nyman, J.S.: The use of nanoindentation for characterizing the properties of mineralized hard tissues: State-of-the art review. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B 87B, 286 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ebenstein, D.M.: Nanoindentation of soft tissues and other biological materials, in Handbook of Nanoindentation with Biological Applications, edited by Oyen, M.L. (Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2010), p. 350.Google Scholar
5.Kaufman, J.D., Miller, G.J., Morgan, E.F., and Klapperich, C.M.: Time-dependent mechanical characterization of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels using nanoindentation and unconfined compression. J. Mater. Res. 23, 1472 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Kaufman, J.D. and Klapperich, C.M.: Surface detection errors cause overestimation of the modulus in nanoindentation on soft materials. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2, 312 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Deuschle, J., Enders, S., and Arzt, E.: Surface detection in nanoindentation of soft polymers. J. Mater. Res. 22, 3107 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fischer-Cripps, A.C.: A review of analysis methods for sub-micron indentation testing. Vacuum 58, 569 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.VanLandingham, M.R., Villarrubia, J.S., Guthrie, W.F., and Meyers, G.F.: Nanoindentation of polymers: An overview. Macromol. Symp. 167, 15 (2001).3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Carrillo, F., Gupta, S., Balooch, M., Marshall, S.J., Marshall, G.W., Pruitt, L., and Puttlitz, C.M.: Nanoindentation of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Effect of crosslinking, work of adhesion, and fluid environment on elastic modulus. J. Mater. Res. 20, 2820 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Carrillo, F., Gupta, S., Balooch, M., Marshall, S.J., Marshall, G.W., Pruitt, L., and Puttlitz, C.M.: Nanoindentation of polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Effect of crosslinking, work of adhesion, and fluid environment on elastic modulus (vol. 20, p. 2820, 2005). J. Mater. Res. 21, 535 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Ebenstein, D.M. and Wahl, K.J.: A comparison of JKR-based methods to analyze quasi-static and dynamic indentation force curves. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 298, 652 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Gupta, S., Carrillo, F., Li, C., Pruitt, L., and Puttlitz, C.: Adhesive forces significantly affect elastic modulus determination of soft polymeric materials in nanoindentation. Mater. Lett. 61, 448 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Franke, O., Goken, M., and Hodge, A.M.: The nanoindentation of soft tissue: Current and developing approaches. JOM 60, 49 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Mann, A.B. and Pethica, J.B.: Nanoindentation studies in a liquid environment. Langmuir 12, 4583 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Rho, J.Y. and Pharr, G.M.: Effects of drying on the mechanical properties of bovine femur measured by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Sci. - Mater. Med. 10, 485 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Tang, B. and Ngan, A.H.W.: Nanoindentation measurement of mechanical properties of soft solid covered by a thin liquid film. Soft Mater. 5, 169 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Gauthier, M. and Nourine, M.: Capillary force disturbances on a partially submerged cylindrical micromanipulator. IEEE Trans. Robot 23, 600 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Johnson, K.L., Kendall, K., and Roberts, A.D.: Surface energy and contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 324, 301 (1971).Google Scholar
21.Cao, Y.F., Yang, D.H., and Soboyejoy, W.: Nanoindentation method for determining the initial contact and adhesion characteristics of soft polydimethylsiloxane. J. Mater. Res. 20, 2004 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Sun, Y.J., Akhremitchev, B., and Walker, G.C.: Using the adhesive interaction between atomic force microscopy tips and polymer surfaces to measure the elastic modulus of compliant samples. Langmuir 20, 5837 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Grunlan, J.C., Xinyun, X., Rowenhorst, D., and Gerberich, W.W.: Preparation and evaluation of tungsten tips relative to diamond for nanoindentation of soft materials. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 2804 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Galli, M., Comley, K.S.C., Shean, T.A.V., and Oyen, M.L.: Viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanical characterization of hydrated gels. J. Mater. Res. 24, 973 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Derjaguin, B.V., Muller, V.M., and Toporov, Y.P.: Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 53, 314 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Maugis, D.: Adhesion of spheres: The JKR-DMT transition using a Dugdale model. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 150, 243 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Tabor, D.: Surface forces and surface interactions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 58, 2 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Deuschle, J.K., Buerki, G., Deuschle, H.M., Enders, S., Michler, J., and Arzt, E.: In situ indentation testing of elastomers. Acta Mater. 56, 4390 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar