Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:23:14.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiscale mechanical characterization of biomimetic physically associating gels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Thomas F. Juliano ,
Aaron M. Forster ,
Peter L. Drzal ,
Tusit Weerasooriya ,
Paul Moy  and
Mark R. VanLandingham
Thomas F. Juliano
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons & Materials Research Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 21005
Aaron M. Forster
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons & Materials Research Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 21005
Peter L. Drzal
Affiliation:
PPG Industries, Inc., Allison Park, PA 15101
Tusit Weerasooriya
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons & Materials Research Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 21005
Paul Moy
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons & Materials Research Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 21005
Mark R. VanLandingham*
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons & Materials Research Directorate, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 21005
*
b)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical response of living tissue is important to understanding the injury-risk associated with impact events. Often, ballistic gelatin or synthetic materials are developed to serve as tissue surrogates in mechanical testing. Unfortunately, current materials are not optimal and present several experimental challenges. Bulk measurement techniques, such as compression and shear testing geometries, do not fully represent the stress states and rate of loading experienced in an actual impact event. Indentation testing induces deviatoric stress states as well as strain rates not typically available to bulk measurement equipment. In this work, a ballistic gelatin and two styrene-isoprene triblock copolymer gels are tested and compared using both macroscale and microscale measurements. A methodology is presented to conduct instrumented indentation experiments on materials with a modulus far below 1 MPa. The synthetic triblock copolymer gels were much easier to test than the ballistic gelatin. Compared to ballistic gelatin, both copolymer gels were found to have a greater degree of thermal stability. All of the materials exhibit strain-rate dependence, although the magnitude of dependence was a function of the loading rate and testing method.

Keywords

BiomimeticEnergy storagePolymer
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 21 , Issue 8 , August 2006 , pp. 2084 - 2092
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Fackler, M.L., Malinowski, J.A.: The wound profile: A visual method for quantifying gunshot wound components. J. Trauma-Injury Infection Crit. Care 25, 522 (1985).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Fackler, M.L., Surinchak, J.S., Malinowski, J.A., Bowen, R.E.: Bullet fragmentation: A major cause of tissue disruption. J. Trauma-Injury Infection Crit. Care 24, 35 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Simmonds, K.E., Matic, P., Chase, M., and Leung, A.: 2004 NRL Review. www.nrl.navy.mil.Google Scholar
4.Biermann, P.J., Ward, E.M., Cain, R.P., Carkhuff, B., Merkle, A.C., Roberts, J.C.: Development of a physical human surrogate torso model for ballistic impact and blast. J. Adv. Mater. 38, 3 (2006).Google Scholar
5.Hole, L.G.Anatomical models based on gelatin and the influence of garmets on impact damage. (Shoe & Allied Trade Research Association, Satra House, Kettering, North Hamptonshire, UK, 1980).Google Scholar
6.Data Book on Mechanical Properties of Living Cells, Tissues, and Organs, edited by Abe, H., Hayashi, K., and Sato, M. (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan, 1996).Google Scholar
7.Nicholas, N.C., Welsch, J.R.: Ballistic Gelatin (Institute for Non-Lethal Defense Technologies Report, Penn State Applied Research Laboratory, Happy Valley, PA, 2004).Google Scholar
8.Dzieman, A.J.A Provisional Casualty Criteria for Fragments and Projectiles, Edgewood Arsenal Maryland Report #2391 (U.S. Army, Edgewood, MD, 1960).Google Scholar
9.Amato, J.J., Billy, L.J., Gruber, R.P., Lawson, N.S., Rich, N.M.: Vascular injuries: An experimental study of high and low velocity missile wounds. Arch. Surg. 101, 167 (1970).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Fackler, M.L.: Wound ballistics: A target for error. Int. Def. Rev. 8, 895 (1988).Google Scholar
11.Lodge, T.P., Hanley, K.J., Pudil, B., Alahapperuma, V.: Phase behavior of block copolymers in a neutral solvent. Macromolecules 36, 816 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hanley, K.J., Lodge, T.P., Huang, C-I.: Phase behavior of a block copolymer in solvents of varying selectivity. Macromolecules 33, 5918 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Watanabe, H., Kuwahara, S., Kotaka, T.: Rheology of styrene-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer in n-tetradecane systems. J. Rheol. 28, 393 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Sato, T., Watanabe, H., Osaki, K.: Thermoreversible physical gelation of block copolymers in a selective solvent. Macromolecules 33, 1686 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Quintana, J.R., Diaz, E., Katime, I.: Influence of the copolymer molar mass on the physical gelation of triblock copolymers in a selective solvent of the middle block. Macromolecules 30, 3507 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Drzal, P.L., Shull, K.R.: Origins of mechanical strength and elasticity in thermally reversible acrylic triblock copolymer gels. Macromolecules 36, 2000 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Laurer, J.H., Mulling, J.F., Khan, S.A., Spontak, R.J., Bukovnik, R.: Thermoplastic elastomer gels. I. Effects of composition and processing on morphology and gel behavior. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 36, 2379 (1998).3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Laurer, J.H., Mulling, J.F., Khan, S.A., Spontak, R.J., Bukovnik, R.: Thermoplastic elastomer gels. II. Effects of composition and temperature on morphology and gel rheology. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 36, 2513 (1998).3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Oliver, W.C., Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Sneddon, I.N.: The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.VanLandingham, M.R., Chang, N-K., Drzal, P.L., White, C.C., Chang, S.H.: Viscoelastic characterization of polymers using instrumented indentation I. Quasi-static testing. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 43, 1794 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.White, C.C., VanLandingham, M.R., Drzal, P.L., Chang, N.K., Chang, S.H.: Viscoelastic characterization of polymers using instrumented indentation II. Dynamic testing. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 43, 1812 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Cheng, L., Xia, X., Yu, W., Scriven, L.E., Gerberich, W.W.: Flat-punch indentation of viscoelastic material. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 38, 10 (2000).3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Oyen, M.L., Cook, R.F.: Load-displacement behavior during sharp indentation of viscous-elastic-plastic materials. J. Mater. Res. 18, 139 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Vriend, N.M., Kren, A.P.: Determination of the viscoelastic properties of elastomeric materials by the dynamic indentation method. Polym. Test. 23, 369 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Fischer-Cripps, A.C.: Multiple-frequency dynamic nanoindentation testing. J. Mater. Res. 19, 2981 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.VanLandingham, M.R., Juliano, T.F., Hagon, M.J.: Measuring tip shape for instrumented indentation using atomic force microscopy. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 2173 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Lee, E.H., Radok, J.R.M.: The contact problem for viscoelastic bodies. Trans. ASME 27, 438 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Ting, T.C.T.: The contact stresses between a rigid indenter and a viscoelastic half-space. J. Appl. Mech. 33, 845 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Engineering with Rubber: How to Design Rubber Components edited by Gent, A.N. (Hanser Publishers, New York, 1992).Google Scholar
32.Lucas, B.N.: An experimental investigation of creep and viscoelastic properties using depth-sensing indentation techniques. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (1997).Google Scholar
33.Conte, N.: Dynamic mechanical characterization of very soft polymeric materials using nanoindentation. Masters Thesis, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (2002).Google Scholar