Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:31:04.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The microstructure and mechanical properties of Al2024-SiCp composite fabricated by powder thixoforming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2017

Pubo Li ,
Tijun Chen  and
He Qin
Pubo Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
Tijun Chen*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
He Qin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this study, SiC particle reinforced Al2024 matrix composites were fabricated by powder thixoforming (PT). Meanwhile, 2024 alloys were fabricated by permanent mold cast (PMC) and PT, respectively, to reveal superiorities of PT technology over the traditional processing technologies and the resulting composite over the matrix alloy. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the three materials were comparatively investigated. The results indicated that both the PT materials possessed finer spheroidal primary particles and smaller eutectic concentration, but the PMC alloy comprised large equiaxed grains, continuously net-shaped eutectic structures, and many porosities. The mechanical properties of the PT alloy were significantly higher than those of the PMC alloy because of the enhanced compactness and work hardening, decreased eutectic concentration, and fine primary particles. The incorporation of SiCp to the PT alloy further brought improvements, the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), yield strength (YS), and hardness were increased by 29.3% (UTS = 388 MPa), 35% (YS = 297 MPa), and 46.8% (hardness = 122.6 HV), respectively. A strengthening model considering different strengthening mechanisms and SiCp failure was proposed and YS of composite could be exactly predicted.

Keywords

powder processingcompositemicrostructure
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 11 , 14 June 2017 , pp. 2079 - 2091
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Varol, T., Canakci, A., and Ozsahin, S.: Modeling of the prediction of densification behavior of powder metallurgy Al–Cu–Mg/B4C composites using artificial neural networks. Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) 28, 182 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canakci, A. and Varol, T.: Microstructure and properties of AA7075/Al–SiC composites fabricated using powder metallurgy and hot pressing. Powder Technol. 268, 72 (2014).Google Scholar
Canakci, A., Arslan, F., and Varol, T.: Effect of volume fraction and size of B4C particles on production and microstructure properties of B4C reinforced aluminium alloy composites. Mater. Sci. Technol. 29, 954 (2013).Google Scholar
Varol, T. and Canakci, A.: Synthesis and characterization of nanocrystalline Al 2024–B4C composite powders by mechanical alloying. Philos. Mag. Lett. 93, 339 (2013).Google Scholar
Varol, T. and Canakci, A.: The effect of type and ratio of reinforcement on the synthesis and characterization Cu-based nanocomposites by flake powder metallurgy. J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1066 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canakci, A., Arslan, F., and Varol, T.: Physical and mechanical properties of stir-casting processed AA2024/B4Cp composites. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 21, 505 (2014).Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Cai, Z.Y., Wang, R.C., Peng, C.Q., Qiu, K., and Wang, N.G.: Microstructure and thermal properties of Al/W-coated diamond composites prepared by powder metallurgy. Mater. Des. 95, 39 (2016).Google Scholar
Chen, C.M., Yang, C.C., and Chao, C.G.: Thixocasting of hypereutectic Al–25Si–2.5Cu–1Mg–0.5Mn alloys using densified powder compacts. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 366, 183 (2004).Google Scholar
Li, P.B., Chen, T.J., Zhang, S.Q., and Guan, R.G.: Research on semisolid microstructural evolution of 2024 aluminum alloy prepared by powder thixoforming. Metals 5, 547 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.S., Chen, T.J., Zhang, S.Q., and Li, P.B.: Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of powder-thixoforged 6061 aluminum alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 25, 699 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P.B. and Chen, T.J.: Effect of SiCp volume fraction on the microstructure and tensile properties of SiCp/2024 Al-based composites prepared by powder thixoforming. J. Mater. Res. 31, 2850 (2016).Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. and Chen, D.L.: Consideration of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites: A model for predicting their yield strength. Scr. Mater. 54, 1321 (2006).Google Scholar
Sanaty-Zadeh, A.: Comparison between current models for the strength of particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites with emphasis on consideration of Hall–Petch effect. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 531, 112 (2012).Google Scholar
Flemings, M.C.: Behavior of metal alloys in the semisolid state. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 22, 957 (1991).Google Scholar
Kirkwood, D.H.: Semisolid metal processing. Int. Mater. Rev. 39, 173 (1994).Google Scholar
Sukumaran, K., Ravikumar, K.K., Pillai, S.G.K., Rajan, T.P.D., Ravi, M., Pillai, R.M., and Pai, B.C.: Studies on squeeze casting of Al 2124 alloy and 2124-10% SiCp metal matrix composite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 490, 235 (2008).Google Scholar
Cai, Y., Tan, M.J., Shen, G.J., and Su, H.Q.: Microstructure and heterogeneous nucleation phenomena in cast SiC particles reinforced magnesium composite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 282, 232 (2000).Google Scholar
Chen, T.J., Huang, L.K., Huang, X.F., Ma, Y., and Hao, Y.: Effects of reheating temperature and time on microstructure and tensile properties of thixoforged AZ63 magnesium alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 30, 96 (2014).Google Scholar
Williamson, G.K. and Hall, W.H.: X-ray line broadening from filed aluminum and wolfram. Acta Metall. 1, 22 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, G.K. and Smallman, R.E.: The use of Fourier analysis in the interpretation of X-ray line broadening from cold-worked iron and molybdenum. Acta Crystallogr. 7, 574 (1954).Google Scholar
Cheng, N.P., Zeng, S.M., and Liu, Z.Y.: Preparation, microstructures and deformation behavior of SiCP/6066Al composites produced by PM route. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 202, 27 (2008).Google Scholar
Hong, S-J., Kim, H-M., Huh, D., Suryanarayana, C., and Chun, B.S.: Effect of clustering on the mechanical properties of SiC particulate-reinforced aluminum alloy 2024 metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 347, 198 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, H., Gao, W.L., Mao, C., Zhang, H., Liu, H.B., Lu, J., and Lu, Z.: Microstructures and mechanical properties of SiCp/2024 aluminum matrix composite synthesized by stir casting. Chin. J. of Nonferrous Met. 20, 217 (2010).Google Scholar
Emamy, M., Oliayee, M., and Tavighi, K.: Microstructures and tensile properties of Al/2024–Al4Sr composite after hot extrusion and T6 heat treatment. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 625, 303 (2015).Google Scholar
Arsenault, R.J., Wang, L., and Feng, C.R.: Strengthening of composites due to microstructural changes in the matrix. Acta Metall. Mater. 39, 47 (1991).Google Scholar
Nardone, V.C. and Prewo, K.M.: On the strength of discontinuous silicon carbide reinforced aluminum composites. Scr. Metall. 20, 43 (1986).Google Scholar
Sajjadi, S.A., Ezatpour, H.R., and Torabi Parizi, M.: Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloy/Al2O3 composites fabricated by stir and compo-casting processes. Mater. Des. 34, 106 (2012).Google Scholar
Shi, Z.L., Yang, J.M., Lee, J.C., Zhang, D., Lee, H.I., and Wu, R.J.: The interfacial characterization of oxidized SiC(p)/2014 Al composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 303, 46 (2001).Google Scholar
Arsenault, R.J., Shi, N., Feng, C.R., and Wang, L.: Localized deformation of SiC Al composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 131, 55 (1991).Google Scholar
Sekine, H. and Chen, R.: A combined microstructure strengthening analysis of SiCp/Al metal matrix composites. Composites 26, 183 (1995).Google Scholar
Miller, W.S. and Humphreys, F.J.: Strengthening mechanisms in particulate metal matrix composites. Scr. Metall. Mater. 25, 33 (1991).Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, N.: An analytical study on strengthening of particulate reinforced metal matrix composites. Acta Mater. 44, 69 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. and Chen, D.L.: Contribution of Orowan strengthening effect in particulate-reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 483–484, 148 (2008).Google Scholar
Hansen, N.: The effect of grain size and strain on the tensile flow stress of aluminium at room temperature. Acta Metall. 25, 863 (1977).Google Scholar
Lewis, C.A. and Withers, P.J.: Weibull modelling of particle cracking in metal matrix composites. Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 3685 (1995).Google Scholar
Li, M., Ghosh, S., Richmond, O., Weiland, H., and Rouns, T.N.: Three dimensional characterization and modeling of particle reinforced metal matrix composites part II: Damage characterization. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 266, 221 (1999).Google Scholar
Clegg, W.J., Horsfall, I., Mason, J.F., and Edwards, L.: The tensile deformation and fracture of Al-“Saffil” metal–matrix composites. Acta Metall. 36, 2151 (1988).Google Scholar
Lee, J.C. and Subramanian, K.N.: Failure behaviour of particulate-reinforced aluminium alloy composites under uniaxial tension. J. Mater. Sci. 27, 5453 (1992).Google Scholar
Song, M. and Xiao, D.H.: Modeling the fracture toughness and tensile ductility of SiCp/Al metal matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 474, 371 (2008).Google Scholar
González, C. and Llorca, J.: Prediction of the tensile stress-strain curve and ductility in Al/SiC composites. Scr. Mater. 35, 91 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H.K.: A computational approach to the investigation of impact damage evolution in discontinuously reinforced fiber composites. Comput. Mech. 27, 504 (2001).Google Scholar
Clyne, T.W. and Withers, P.J.: An Introduction to Metal Matrix Composites (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995); pp. 166–217.Google Scholar
Song, M., Xie, C.Q., and He, Y.H.: Model of effects of particle failure on yield stress of SiC reinforced aluminum alloy composites. Chin. J. of Nonferrous Met. 20, 244 (2010).Google Scholar
Srivatsan, T.S., Sudarshan, T.S., and Lavernia, E.J.: Processing of discontinuously-reinforced metal matrix composites by rapid solidification. Prog. Mater. Sci. 39, 317 (1995).Google Scholar
Rohatgi, P.K., Ray, S., Asthana, R., and Narendranath, C.S.: Interfaces in cast metal-matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 162, 163 (1993).Google Scholar
Ju, J.W. and Lee, H.K.: A micromechanical damage model for effective elastoplastic behavior of ductile matrix composites considering evolutionary complete particle debonding. Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng. 183, 201 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar