Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:01:05.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure analysis of carbon–carbon preform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Zhenyi Liu ,
Guoding Zhang ,
Jinliang Sun ,
Hong Li  and
Musu Ren
Zhenyi Liu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, People’s Republic of China
Guoding Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, People’s Republic of China
Jinliang Sun
Affiliation:
Composites Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, People’s Republic of China
Hong Li
Affiliation:
Composites Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, People’s Republic of China
Musu Ren
Affiliation:
Composites Center, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, People’s Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The microstructure of three kinds of porous carbon–carbon preforms prepared for carbon–carbon/aluminum composites was identified by x-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and field emission scan electronic microscope. Although manufactured at same processing conditions, including the temperature, type of organic gas, and pressure of pyrolysis, the structure of the pyrolytic carbon (Cpy) in three kinds of preforms is different. The morphology of the Cpy is influence by the topology of the preforms greatly, and the crystal structure of the Cpy is influenced by the crystal structure of the carbon fiber greatly, on which surface the Cpy was deposited. The degree of graphitization of the Cpy had been enhanced and the structure of the Cpy changed to more anisotropic form when the preforms were annealed at 2773 K.

Keywords

Composite
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 7 , July 2004 , pp. 2124 - 2130
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bokros, J.C. in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol. 5, edited by Walker, P.L. (Dekker, New York, 1968), pp. 1–118.Google Scholar
2.Benzinger, W. and Hüttinger, K.J.: Chemical vapour infiltration of pyrocarbon: I. Some kinetic considerations. Carbon 34, 1465 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Benzinger, W. and Hüttinger, K.J.: Chemical vapor infiltration of pyrocarbon—II. The influence of increasing methane partial pressure at constant total pressure on infiltration rate and degree of pore filling. Carbon 36, 1033 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Benzinger, W. and Hüttinger, K.J.: Chemical vapor infiltration of pyrocarbon—III: The influence of increasing methane partial pressure at increasing total pressure on infiltration rate and degree of pore filling. Carbon 37, 181 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Benzinger, W. and Hüttinger, K.J.: Chemistry and kinetics of chemical vapor infiltration of pyrocarbon—V. Infiltration of carbon fiber felt. Carbon 37, 941 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Benzinger, W. and Hüttinger, K.J.: Chemistry and kinetics of chemical vapor infiltration of pyrocarbon–VI. Mechanical and structural properties of infiltrated carbon fiber felt. Carbon 37, 1311 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Delhaes, P.: Chemical vapor deposition and infiltration processes of carbon materials. Carbon 40, 641 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Zhang, W.G., Hu, Z.J. and Hüttinger, K.J.: Chemical vapor infiltration of carbon fiber felt: Optimization of densification and carbon microstructure. Carbon 40, 2529 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Dong, G.L. and Hüttinger, K.J.: Consideration of reaction mechanisms leading to pyrolytic carbon of different textures. Carbon 40, 2515 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Jeffrey, J.W., Methods in X-ray Crystallography (Academic Press, London, U.K., 1971), p. 83.Google Scholar
11.Quli, F.A., Thrower, P.A. and Radovic, L.R.: Effects of the substrate on deposit structure and reactivity in the chemical vapor deposition of carbon. Carbon 36, 1623 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Feron, O., Langlais, F., Naslain, R. and Thebault, J.: On kinetic and microstructural transitions in the CVD of pyrocarbon from propane. Carbon 37, 1343 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Evans, A.G. and Zok, F.W.: Physics and mechanics of fibre-reinforced brittle matrix composites. J. Mater. Sci. 29, 3857 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Gu, M., Yang, H., Jiang, W. and Zhang, G.: Study on the interfacial reaction product in Gr/Al composites. Adv. Compos. Mater. 5, 119 (1996).Google Scholar
15.Kelly, B.T. in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol. 5, edited by Walker, L.P. (Dakker, New York, 1968), p. 119.Google Scholar