Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:53:08.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructural development of ZnO using a rate-controlled sintering dilatometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Gaurav Agarwal ,
Robert F. Speyer  and
Wesley S. Hackenberger
Gaurav Agarwal
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Robert F. Speyer
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Wesley S. Hackenberger
Affiliation:
Center for Dielectric Studies, Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access

Abstract

Rate-controlled sintering (RCS) of isostatically pressed particulate compacts of ZnO showed lower average grain sizes and intragranular pore densities than constant heating rate temperature controlled sintering. Valid comparisons of this form could only be made after corrections to hardware and software which reduced specimen creep under dilatometer pushrod load, nonuniform pushrod expansion, reproducible specimen temperature determination, thermal expansion during sintering, and instantaneous termination of sintering at the specified end of RCS. The improved microstructures from RCS were attributed to maximized efficiency of densification, optimizing the time and temperatures permitted for grain growth.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , March 1996 , pp. 671 - 679
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Palmour, H. III, Huckabee, M. L., and Hare, T. M., in Sintering—New Developments, edited by Ristic, M. M. (Plenum Press, New York, 1978), pp. 205–215.Google Scholar
2.Huckabee, M. L. and Palmour, H. III, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 51, 574–576 (1972).Google Scholar
3.Palmour, H. III, Bradley, R. A., and Johnson, D. R., in Kinetics of Reactions in Ionic Systems, edited by Gray, T. J. and Frechette, V. D. (Plenum Press, New York, 1969), pp. 392–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Palmour, H. III, Huckabee, M. L., and Hare, T. M., in Ceramic Microstructure, edited by Fulrath, R. N. and Pask, J.A. (Westview Publishers, Boulder, CO, 1977), pp. 308–318.Google Scholar
5.Huckabee, M. L., Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University (1978).Google Scholar
6.Cuzzo, P. and German, R.M., Progress in Powder Metallurgy (Metals Powder Industry Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1986), Vol. 42, pp. 249–266.Google Scholar
7.Jamil, S. J. and Brook, R. J., Brit. Ceram. Trans. J. 90 (2), 39–44 (1991).Google Scholar
8.Kaysser, W.A. and Ahn, I.S., Modern Development in Powder Metallurgy (Metal Powder Industry Federation, Princeton, NJ, 1988), Vol. 19, pp. 235–247.Google Scholar
9.Chiou, B. S., Koh, C. M., and Duh, J. G., J. Mat. Sci. 22 (11), 3893–3900 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kenny, N., Shrout, T. R., and Ho, J., Proc. Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 4, 493–496 (1991).Google Scholar
11.Hackenberger, W. S. and Speyer, R. F., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65 (3), 701–706 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Echiverri, L., M.S. Thesis, Alfred University, Alfred, NY (1992).Google Scholar