Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:30:36.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical behavior of a DD5 single crystal superalloy with different misorientations under quasi-static and dynamic compression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2018

Zhenpeng Liu ,
Hong Zhong ,
Yumin Wang ,
Shuangming Li  and
Hengzhi Fu
Zhenpeng Liu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Hong Zhong*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Yumin Wang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Shuangming Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Hengzhi Fu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effects of misorientation on the quasi-static and dynamic mechanical behaviors of a second generation Ni-based single crystal superalloy DD5 were investigated. A Split-Hopkinson pressure bar system was used to perform dynamic compression. The crystallographic misorientation between the stress axis and the [001] direction was characterized through rotating orientation X-ray diffraction. The results demonstrated that the flow stress was closely related to the misorientation. It decreased first and consequently increased as the misorientation increased from 0° to 45°. The dynamic flow stress was significantly higher than the quasi-static stress. Moreover, the flow stress under dynamics was more sensitive to the misorientation. A constitutive model was used to illustrate the misorientation effect on the mechanical behavior. Finally, the effect of strain rate on the crystal orientation was also investigated. It was discovered that the orientation deviation change following quasi-static compression could be neglected. By contrast, the orientation changed by 3–9° subsequently to dynamic compression.

Keywords

alloystress/strain relationshipcrystalline
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 18 , 28 September 2018 , pp. 2796 - 2805
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Reed, R.C.: The Superalloys: Fundamentals and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006); p. 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Yuan, Y., Gao, Z., Li, B., Yang, G., and Song, X.: Plastic deformation mechanisms in a new Ni-base single crystal superalloy at room temperature. J. Microsc. 268, 186 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, L., Chalons, H., Maigre, H., and Nelias, D.: High strain rate behavior of MC2 single crystal under uniaxial compression load at high temperature: Experiments and modeling. Mech. Mater. 104, 145 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X.B., Liu, L., Yu, Z.H., Zhang, W.G., and Fu, H.Z.: Microstructure development of different orientated nickel-base single crystal superalloy in directional solidification. Mater. Charact. 61, 7 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, L.X., Chen, J., Xiao, W.L., and Ma, C.L.: Orientational dependence of microstructure evolution and the related deformation mechanism of a single crystal Ni-base superalloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 684, 115 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Z.J., Wang, L., Wang, D., Lou, L.H., and Zhang, J.: Effect of secondary orientation on room temperature tensile behaviors of Ni-base single crystal superalloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 659, 130 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leidermark, D., Moverare, J.J., Simonsson, K., Sjöström, S., and Johansson, S.: Room temperature yield behaviour of a single-crystal nickel-base superalloy with tension/compression asymmetry. Comput. Mater. Sci. 47, 366 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.N., Liu, Y., Yu, J.J., Xu, Y., Sun, X.F., Guan, H.R., and Hu, Z.Q.: Orientation and temperature dependence of yielding and deformation behavior of a nickel-base single crystal superalloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 505, 144 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R.P., Thomas, C.R., and Dardi, L.E.: The effect of crystallographic orientation on the physical and mechanical properties of an investment cast single crystal nickel-base superalloy. In Superalloys, Bricknell, W.B.K.R.H., Gell, M., Kortovich, C.S., and Radavich, J.F., eds. (TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1984); p. 185.Google Scholar
Vattré, A. and Fedelich, B.: On the relationship between anisotropic yield strength and internal stresses in single crystal superalloys. Mech. Mater. 43, 930 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattré, A., Devincre, B., and Roos, A.: Orientation dependence of plastic deformation in nickel-based single crystal superalloys: Discrete–continuous model simulations. Acta Mater. 58, 1938 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Yuan, Y., Li, B., Guo, S.W., Yang, G.X., and Song, X.L.: Tensile deformation behavior of a new Ni-base superalloy at room temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 655, 152 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y.Z., Volek, A., and Singer, R.F.: Effect of grain boundary characteristics on hot tearing in directional solidification of superalloys. J. Mater. Res. 21, 2361 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matan, N., Cox, D.C., Carter, P., Rist, M.A., Rae, C.M.F., and Reed, R.C.: Creep of CMSX-4 superalloy single crystals: Effects of misorientation and temperature. Acta Mater. 47, 1549 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, D.M. and Cetel, A.: Evaluation of PWA1483 for large single crystal IGT blade applications. In Superalloys, Pollock, T.M., Kissinger, R.D., and Bowman, R.R., eds. (TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 2000); p. 295.Google Scholar
Wang, J.J., Guo, W.G., Su, Y., Zhou, P., and Yuan, K.B.: Anomalous behaviors of a single-crystal nickel-base superalloy over a wide range of temperatures and strain rates. Mech. Mater. 94, 79 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J.J., Guo, W.G., Li, P.H., Zhou, P., and Wang, Z.Q.: Dynamic tensile properties of a single crystal nickel-base superalloy at high temperatures measured with an improved SHTB technique. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 670, 1 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, R.J. and Huang, Z.H.: Microstructual evolution and stability of second generation single crystal nickel-based superalloy DD5. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 26, 2079 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suo, T., Li, Y-l., Xie, K., Zhao, F., Zhang, K-S., and Deng, Q.: Experimental investigation on strain rate sensitivity of ultra-fine grained copper at elevated temperatures. Mech. Mater. 43, 111 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C., Suo, T., Tan, W., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Wang, C., and Li, Y.: An experimental method for determination of dynamic mechanical behavior of materials at high temperatures. Int. J. Impact Eng. 102, 27 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abotula, S., Shukla, A., and Chona, R.: Dynamic constitutive behavior of Hastelloy X under thermo-mechanical loads. J. Mater. Sci. 46, 4971 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, W.D., Liu, K.X., Xia, X.X., and Wang, W.H.: The failure stress of bulk metallic glasses under very high strain rate. J. Mater. Res. 25, 1230 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeghi, F., Kermanpur, A., Sarami, N., Heydari, D., Nematollahi, J., and Bahmani, M.: A comparison on the EBSD and RO-XRD techniques for measuring crystal orientation of the single-crystal Ni-Based superalloys. Metallogr., Microstruct., Anal. 5, 342 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Z., Fu, T., and Fu, H.: Crystal orientation measured by XRD and annotation of the butterfly diagram. Mater. Charact. 44, 431 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z.M., Guo, Z.Q., and Li, J.G.: A new method to evaluate the quality of single crystal Cu by an X-ray diffraction butterfly pattern method. Mater. Charact. 53, 395 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.B., Liu, L., Zhao, X.B., Li, Y.F., Zhang, J., and Fu, H.Z.: Dendrite morphology and evolution mechanism of nickel-based single crystal superalloys grown along the 〈001〉 and 〈011〉 orientations. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 22, 407 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.Q., Beyerlein, I.J., and LeSar, R.: Plastic anisotropy in fcc single crystals in high rate deformation. Int. J. Plast. 25, 26 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezz, S.S., Sun, Y.Q., and Hirsch, P.B.: Strain rate dependence of the flow stress and work hardening of γ′. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 192–193, 45 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Österle, W., Bettge, D., Fedelich, B., and Klingelhöffer, H.: Modelling the orientation and direction dependence of the critical resolved shear stress of nickel-base superalloy single crystals. Acta Mater. 48, 689 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, D.M. and Duhl, D.N.: The effect of orientation, temperature and gamma prime size on the yield strength of a single crystal nickel base superalloy. In Superalloys, Bricknell, W.B.K.R.H., Gell, M., Kortovich, C.S., and Radavich, J.F., eds. (TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1984); p. 105.Google Scholar
Westbrooke, E.F., Forero, L.E., and Ebrahimi, F.: Slip analysis in a Ni-base superalloy. Acta Mater. 53, 2137 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P., Zhou, B.M., Zhou, Y.Z., Li, J.G., Jin, T., Sun, X.F., and Zhang, Z.F.: Effect of orientations on in situ tensile deformation and fracture behaviours of nickel-base single-crystal superalloys. Philos. Mag. A 94, 2426 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miner, R., Gabb, T., Gayda, J., and Hemker, K.: Orientation and temperature dependence of some mechanical properties of the single-crystal nickel-base superalloy René N4: Part III. Tension-compression anisotropy. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 17, 507 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitz, A., Lagerpusch, U., and Nembach, E.: CRSS anisotropy and tension/compression asymmetry of a commercial superalloy. Acta Mater. 46, 4769 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lall, C., Chin, S., and Pope, D.P.: The orientation and temperature dependence of the yield stress of Ni3(Al,Nb) single crystals. Metall. Trans. A 10, 1323 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar