Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:50:30.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical and microstructure properties of deformed Al–Al2O3 nanocomposite at elevated temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

H.R. Ezatpour ,
S.A. Sajjadi ,
A. Chaichi  and
G.R. Ebrahimi
H.R. Ezatpour
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Sabzevar University of New Technology, Sabzevar, Iran
S.A. Sajjadi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgical Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
A. Chaichi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
G.R. Ebrahimi*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials and Polymer Engineering, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Hot isotherm compression tests were performed in temperature range of 350–500 °C and at strain rates of 0.0005 to 0.5 s−1 for Al6061 alloy reinforced with alumina nanoparticles. Effect of deformation parameters and optimal conditions for hot working this nanocomposite were comprehended thoroughly via hot working data analyses, electron microscopy images, and X-ray diffractograms. The results indicated the severity of hot deformation process and an increase in the activation energy to 320 kJ/mol due to the addition of nanoparticles. Dynamic recovery (DRV) was considered as the individual determinative softening mechanism during hot deformation of this nanocomposite, and no sign of dynamic recrystallization (DRX) phenomenon observed in the same domain. The unstable region occurred at high strain rates and temperature range of 350–500 °C accompanied with happening drastic defects such as shear bands and cracks. Furthermore, the value of both critical strain and critical stress increased with increasing the strain rate and alumina addition. On the other hand, increasing the temperature decreased the value of critical strain and facilitated the initiation of softening mechanisms.

Keywords

aluminum metal matrix nanocompositehot deformation parameterssoftening mechanismstexture analysis
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , 28 March 2017 , pp. 1118 - 1128
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Casati, R.: Aluminum Matrix Composites Reinforced with Alumina Nanoparticles (Springer, New York, 2016).Google Scholar
Ramezanalizadeh, H., Emamy, M., and Shokouhimehr, M.: A novel aluminum based nanocomposite with high strength and good ductility. J. Alloys Compd. 649, 461–473 (2015).Google Scholar
Ajayan, P.M., Schadler, L.S., and Braun, P.V.: Nanocomposite Science and Technology (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2006).Google Scholar
Reddy, B.S.: Advances in Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization and Industrial Application (InTech, India, 2011).Google Scholar
Khamei, A. and Dehghani, K.: Effects of strain rate and temperature on hot tensile deformation of severe plastic deformed 6061 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 627, 1–9 (2015).Google Scholar
Abolhasani, D., Ezatpour, H.R., Sajjadi, S.A., and Abolhasani, Q.: Microstructure and mechanical properties evolution of 6061 aluminum alloy formed by forward thixoextrusion process. J. Mater. Des. 49, 784–790 (2013).Google Scholar
Wei, C., Guan, Y.p., and Wang, Z.h.: Hot deformation behavior of high Ti 6061 Al alloy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 26, 369–377 (2016).Google Scholar
Deng, K., Wang, X., Zheng, M., and Wu, K.: Dynamic recrystallization behavior during hot deformation and mechanical properties of 0.2 μm SiCp reinforced Mg matrix composite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 560, 824–830 (2013).Google Scholar
Su, H., Gao, W., Feng, Z., and Lu, Z.: Processing, microstructure and tensile properties of nano-sized Al2O3 particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater. Des. 36, 590–596 (2012).Google Scholar
Kok, M.: Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 161, 381–387 (2005).Google Scholar
Fan, X., Li, M., Li, D., Shao, Y., Zhang, S., and Peng, Y.: Dynamic recrystallisation and dynamic precipitation in AA6061 aluminium alloy during hot deformation. Mater. Sci. Technol. 30, 1263–1272 (2014).Google Scholar
Li, X., Liu, C., Luo, K., Ma, M., and Liu, R.: Hot deformation behaviour of SiC/AA6061 composites prepared by spark plasma sintering. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 291–297 (2016).Google Scholar
Asgharzadeh, H., Simchi, A., and Kim, H.: Hot deformation of ultrafine-grained Al6063/Al2O3 nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 46, 4994–5001 (2011).Google Scholar
Hesabi, Z.R., Sanjari, M., Simchi, A., Reihani, S., and Simancik, F.: Effect of alumina nanoparticles on hot strength and deformation behaviour of AI-5 vol% nanocomposite: Experimental study and modelling. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 2641–2645 (2010).Google Scholar
Bhandare, R.G. and Sonawane, P.M.: Preparation of aluminium matrix composite by using stir casting method. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 3, 2249–8958 (2013).Google Scholar
Yang, Q., Deng, Z., Zhang, Z., Liu, Q., Jia, Z., and Huang, G.: Effects of strain rate on flow stress behavior and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu aluminum alloy during hot deformation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 662, 204–213 (2016).Google Scholar
Ezatpour, H.R., Sabzevar, M.H., Sajjadi, S.A., and Huang, Y.: Investigation of work softening mechanisms and texture in a hot deformed 6061 aluminum alloy at high temperature. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 606, 240–247 (2014).Google Scholar
Kai, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, A., Wang, C., and Mao, Z.: Hot deformation behavior of in situ nano ZrB2 reinforced 2024Al matrix composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 116, 1–8 (2015).Google Scholar
Ezatpour, H.R., Chaichi, A., and Sajjadi, S.A.: The effect of Al2O3-nanoparticles as the reinforcement additive on the hot deformation behavior of 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 88, 1049–1056 (2015).Google Scholar
Saravanan, L. and Senthilvelan, T.: Investigations on the hot workability characteristics and deformation mechanisms of aluminium alloy-Al2O3 nanocomposite. Mater. Des. 79, 6–14 (2015).Google Scholar
Prasad, Y., Rao, K., and Gupta, M.: Hot workability and deformation mechanisms in Mg/nano-Al2O3 composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 1070–1076 (2009).Google Scholar
Hogg, S., Palmer, I., Thomas, L., and Grant, P.: Processing, microstructure and property aspects of a spraycast Al–Mg–Li–Zr. Acta Mater. 55, 1885–1894 (2007).Google Scholar
Nan, Y., Ning, Y., Liang, H., Guo, H., Yao, Z., and Fu, M.: Work-hardening effect and strain-rate sensitivity behavior during hot deformation of Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe alloy. Mater. Des. 82, 84–90 (2015).Google Scholar
Lin, Y. and Chen, X.M.: A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater. Des. 32, 1733–1759 (2011).Google Scholar
Mondolfo, L.F.: Aluminum Alloys: Structure and Properties (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2013).Google Scholar
Chen, L., Zhao, G., and Yu, J.: Hot deformation behavior and constitutive modeling of homogenized 6026 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 74, 25–35 (2015).Google Scholar
Huang, C.q., Diao, J.p., Hua, D., Li, B.j., and Hu, X.h.: Microstructure evolution of 6016 aluminum alloy during compression at elevated temperatures by hot rolling emulation. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23, 1576–1582 (2013).Google Scholar
Wu, H., Wen, S., Huang, H., Wu, X., Gao, K., Wang, W., and Nie, Z.: Hot deformation behavior and constitutive equation of a new type Al–Zn–Mg–Er–Zr alloy during isothermal compression. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 651, 415–424 (2016).Google Scholar
Akbari, Z., Mirzadeh, H., and Cabrera, J.M.: A simple constitutive model for predicting flow stress of medium carbon microalloyed steel during hot deformation. Mater. Des. 77, 126–131 (2015).Google Scholar
Luan, B.f., Qiu, R.s., Li, C.h., Yang, X.f., Li, Z.q., Zhang, D., and Qing, L.: Hot deformation and processing maps of Al2O3/Al composites fabricated by flake powder metallurgy. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 25, 1056–1063 (2015).Google Scholar
Li, X., Liu, C., Luo, K., Ma, M., and Liu, R.: Hot deformation behaviour of SiC/AA6061 composites prepared by spark plasma sintering. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 291–297 (2016).Google Scholar
Prasad, Y.: Processing maps: A status report. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 12, 638–645 (2003).Google Scholar
Ezatpour, H.R., Sajjadi, S.A., Haddad-Sabzevar, M., and Ebrahimi, G.R.: Hot deformation and processing maps of K310 cold work tool steel. J. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 550, 152–159 (2012).Google Scholar
Narayana Murty, S., Nageswara Rao, B., and Kashyap, B.: Instability criteria for hot deformation of materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 45, 15–26 (2000).Google Scholar
Mrówka-Nowotnik, G., Sieniawski, J., Kotowski, S., Nowotnik, A., and Motyka, M.: Hot deformation of 6xxx series aluminum alloys. Arch. Metall. Mater. 60, 1079–1084 (2015).Google Scholar
Kai, X., Chen, C., Sun, X., Wang, C., and Zhao, Y.: Hot deformation behavior and optimization of processing parameters of a typical high-strength Al–Mg–Si alloy. Mater. Des. 90, 1151–1158 (2016).Google Scholar
Nunes, R.: Properties and selection: Nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials. Metals Handbook, Vol. 2, 10th ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, 1990).Google Scholar
Kok, M.: Production of Metal Matrix (Al2O3-reinforced) Composite Materials and Investigation of Their Machinability by Ceramic Tools. Ph.D. Thesis, Firat University, Elazıg, Turkey (2000). Google Scholar