Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:29:19.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Instrumented Vickers microindentation of alumina-based materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2006

S. Bueno  and
C. Baudin
S. Bueno
Affiliation:
Instituto de Cerámica y Vidrio, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
C. Baudin*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Cerámica y Vidrio, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The adequacy of instrumented Vickers depth-sensing microindentation to determine Young's modulus of alumina-based ceramics was analyzed. Monophase alumina materials and alumina + 10 vol% aluminium titanate composites, with different microstructures, were tested to determine the effect of microcracking. The load–depth penetration of the indenter curves together with the observation of the imprints by scanning electron microscopy were used to analyze the behavior of the materials. Maximum stiffness was determined from the derivatives of the load-depth curves during unloading. The areas of the imprints measured optically were more representative of the behavior of the materials than the areas calculated from depth-penetration measurements. The formation of microcracks affected the shape of the unloading portion of the curves. Significant differences between the values of Young's modulus determined for different materials and definite relationships between the microstructural parameters of the materials and the Young's modulus were found.

Keywords

Grain sizeMicrostructureElastic properties
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2006 , pp. 161 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Anstis, G.R., Chantikul, P., Lawn, B.R. and Marshall, D.B.: A critical evaluation of indentation techniques for measuring fracture toughness: I. Direct crack measurements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 64, 533 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lawn, B.R., Evans, A.G. and Marshall, D.B.: Elastic/plastic indentation damage in ceramics: The median/radial crack system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 63, 574 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sbaizero, O. and Lucchini, E.: Influence of residual stresses on the mechanical properties of a layered ceramic composite. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 16, 813 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Sathyamoorthy, R., Virkar, A.V. and Cutler, R.A.: Damage-resistance SiC–AlN layered composites with surface compressive stresses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 1136 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Baker, S.P. The analysis of depth-sensing indentation data, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties IV, edited by Townsend, P.H., Weihs, T.P., Sanchez, J.E. Jr. and Børgesen, P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 308 Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), p. 209.Google Scholar
6.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Mata, M. and Alcalá, J.: Mechanical property evaluation through sharp indentations in elastoplastic and fully plastic contact regimes. J. Mater. Res. 18, 1705 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bell, T.J., Bendeli, A., Field, J.S., Swain, M.V. and Thwaite, E.G.: The determination of surface plastic and elastic properties by ultra micro-indentation. Metrologia 28, 463 1991/1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Pharr, G.M., Oliver, W.C. and Clarke, D.R.: Hysteresis and discontinuity in the indentation load-displacement behavior of silicon. Scripta Metall. 23, 1949 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Mencik, J. and Swain, M.V.: Errors associated with depth-sensing microindentation tests. J. Mater. Res. 10, 1491 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Chen, Y.M., Ruff, A.W. and Dally, J.W.: A hybrid method for determining material properties from instrumented microindentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 9, 1314 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Joslin, D.L. and Oliver, W.C.: A new method for analyzing data from continuous depth-sensing microindentation tests. J. Mater. Res. 5, 123 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Pharr, G.M., Oliver, W.C. and Brotzen, F.R.: On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation. J. Mater. Res. 7, 613 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kese, K.O., Li, Z.C. and Bergman, B.: Influence of residual stress on elastic modulus and hardness of soda-lime glass measured by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3109 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Jung, Y., Lawn, B.R., Martyniuk, M., Huang, H. and Hu, X.Z.: Evaluation of elastic modulus and hardness of thin films by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3076 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Peng, Z., Gong, J. and Miao, H.: On the description of indentation size effect in hardness testing for ceramics: Analysis of the nanoindentation data. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24, 2193 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Choi, Y., Lee, H. and Kwuon, D.: Analysis of sharp-tip-indentation load-depth curve for contact area determination taking into account pile-up and sink-in effects. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3307 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V.: Determining the mechanical properties of small volumes of material from submicrometer spherical indentations. J. Mater. Res. 10, 101 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Schall, J.D. and Brenner, D.W.: Atomistic simulation of the influence of pre-existing stress on the interpretation of nanoindentation data. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3172 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Suresh, S., Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Alcalá, J.: Spherical indentation of compositionally graded materials: Theory and experiments. Acta Mater. 45, 1307 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Alcalá, J., Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Suresh, S.: Continuous measurements of load penetration curves with spherical microindenters and the estimation of mechanical properties. J. Mater. Res. 13, 1390 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Alcalá, J.: Instrumented microindentation of zirconia ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 1977 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Xie, Z.H., Hoffman, M., Moon, R.J., Munroe, P.R. and Cheng, Y.B.: Subsurface indentation damage and mechanical characterization of α-sialon ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 87, 2114 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Zeng, K., Söderlund, E., Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Rowcliffe, D.J.: Controlled indentation: A general approach to determine mechanical properties of brittle materials. Acta Mater. 44, 1127 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D.: A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Baudín, C., Cambier, F. and Delaey, L.: Fractographic and acoustic emission studies of mullite-alumina zirconia composites prepared by reaction sintering. J. Mater. Sci. 22, 4398 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Cook, R.F. and Pharr, G.M.: Direct observation and analysis of indentation cracking in glasses and ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 787 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Taylor, D.: Thermal expansion data: III. Sesquioxides, M2O3 with the corundum and the A-, B- and C-M2O3 structures. Br. Ceram. Trans. J. 83, 92 (1984).Google Scholar
30.Taylor, D.: Thermal expansion data. XI. Complex oxides, A2BO5, and the garnets. Brit. Cer. Trans. J. 86, 1 (1987).Google Scholar
31.Buresch, F.E., Frye, K. and Müller, Th. Relationships between microcrack zones and toughness of fine grained alumina and coarse grained graphite, in Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, 5, Surface Flaws, Statistics and Microcracking, edited by Bradt, R.C., Evans, A.G., Hasselman, D.P.H., and Lange, F.F. (Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1983), p. 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Uribe, R. and Baudín, C.: Influence of a dispersion of aluminium titanate particles of controlled size on the thermal shock resistance of alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86, 846 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Bueno, S., Moreno, R. and Baudín, C.: Reaction sintered Al2O3/Al2TiO5 microcrack-free composites obtained by colloidal filtration. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24, 2785 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Penty, R.A., Hasselman, D.P.H. and Spriggs, M.: Young's modulus of high-density polycrystalline mullite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 55, 169 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Guiberteau, F., Padture, N.P. and Lawn, B.R.: Effect of grain size on Hertzian contact damage in alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1825 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Alcalá, J., Barone, A.C. and Anglada, M.: The influence of plastic hardening on surface deformation modes around Vickers and spherical indents. Acta Mater. 48, 3451 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Walsh, J.B.: The effect of cracks on the compressibility of rock. J. Geophys. Res. 70, 381 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar