Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:05:22.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of the deformation heating on the flow behavior of 6063 alloy during compression at medium strain rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Shikang Li Open the ORCID record for Shikang Li [Opens in a new window] ,
Luoxing Li ,
Hong He  and
Guan Wang
Shikang Li*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; and College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
Luoxing Li*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China; and College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
Hong He
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
Guan Wang
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The flow softening behavior caused by deformation heating of the 6063 aluminum alloy was investigated employing uniaxial compression tests. The adiabatic correction factor (η) and mechanical work partitioning factor (φ), commonly considered to be constant, were found to be highly variable at medium strain rates, namely from 0.01 to 10 s−1. η decreased with increasing strain and decreasing strain rate, but it was relatively not sensitive to temperature. φ, traditionally taken to be a constant of 0–10%, was found to vary from 2.8% at a temperature of 623 K and a strain rate of 10 s−1 to 26.8% at a temperature of 773 K with a strain rate of 0.01 s−1. An expression for temperature rise involving these two variable factors was optimized. FEM simulation using the corrected and uncorrected true stress–strain curves and corresponding extrusion experiment were carried out. Comparisons between the simulated and experimental results confirmed the temperature compensation was trustable.

Keywords

Alextrusionstress/strain relationship
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , 28 January 2019 , pp. 309 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Peng, L., Xu, Z., Gao, Z., and Fu, M.: A constitutive model for metal plastic deformation at micro/meso scale with consideration of grain orientation and its evolution. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 138, 74 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Di, H., Wang, X., Cao, Y., Zhang, J., and Ma, T.: Constitutive analysis of the hot deformation behavior of Fe–23Mn–2Al–0.2C twinning induced plasticity steel in consideration of strain. Mater. Des. 44, 354 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokni, M.R., Widener, C.A., Champagne, V.K., Crawford, G.A., and Nutt, S.R.: The effects of heat treatment on 7075Al cold spray deposits. Surf. Coat. Technol. 310, 278 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadras, P. and Thomas, J.F.: Characterization and modeling for forging deformation of Ti–6Ai–2Sn–4Zr–2Mo–0.1Si. Metall. Trans. A 12, 1867 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charpentier, P.L., Stone, B.C., Ernst, S.C., and Thomas, J.F.: Characterization and modeling of the high temperature flow behavior of aluminum alloy 2024. Metall. Trans. A 17, 2227 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, R.L. and Semiatin, S.L.: The adiabatic correction factor for deformation heating during the uniaxial compression test. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 10, 710 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Hou, L.G., Luo, J.R., Zhang, J.S., and Zhuang, L.Z.: Characterization of hot workability in AA 7050 aluminum alloy using activation energy and 3-D processing map. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 225, 110 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S.Y. and Kim, W.J.: Difference in the hot compressive behavior and processing maps between the as-cast and homogenized Al–Zn–Mg–Cu (7075) alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 32, 660 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottstein, G., Frommert, M., Goerdeler, M., and Schäfer, N.: Prediction of the critical conditions for dynamic recrystallization in the austenitic steel 800H. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 387, 604 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., Liu, Y., Liu, C., Zhou, X., and Li, H.: Study on microstructure evolution and constitutive modeling for hot deformation behavior of a low-carbon RAFM steel. J. Mater. Res. 32, 1376 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, L., Gao, W., Feng, Z., Lu, Z., and Mao, G.: Microstructure characteristics and constitutive modeling for elevated temperature flow behavior of Al–Cu–Li X2A66 alloy. J. Mater. Res. 33, 1 (2017).Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, X., Liu, C., Yu, L., and Li, C.: Processing maps and microstructural evolution of the type 347H austenitic heat-resistant stainless steel. J. Mater. Res. 30, 2090 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, Y.V.R.K., Sastry, D.H., and Deevi, S.C.: Processing maps for hot working of a P/M iron aluminide alloy. Intermetallics 8, 1067 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghasemi, E., Zarei-Hanzaki, A., Farabi, E., Tesař, K., Jäger, A., and Rezaee, M.: Flow softening and dynamic recrystallization behavior of BT9 titanium alloy: A study using process map development. J. Alloys Compd. 695, 1706 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, Y.V.R.K.: Author’s reply: Dynamic materials model: Basis and principles. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 235 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murty, S.V.S.N., Rao, B.N., and Kashyap, B.P.: On the hot working characteristics of 2014Al–20 vol% Al2O3 metal matrix composite. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 166, 279 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J., Li, M.Q., and Ma, D.W.: The deformation behavior and processing maps in the isothermal compression of 7A09 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 532, 548 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rath, B.B. and Pande, C.S.: Recovery of low-temperature flow stress in zone-refined aluminum single crystals. Acta Mater. 61, 3735 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Jiang, F., Shang, X., and Li, L.: Flow stress and microstructural evolution of the horizontal continuous casting Al–0.96Mn–0.38Si–0.18Fe alloy during hot compression. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 571, 25 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H., Li, L., Yuan, D., and Peng, D.: Hot deformation behavior of the new Al–Mg–Si–Cu aluminum alloy during compression at elevated temperatures. Mater. Charact. 58, 168–173 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Luo, J.R., Hou, L.G., Zhang, J.S., and Zhuang, L.Z.: Physically based constitutive analysis and microstructural evolution of AA7050 aluminum alloy during hot compression. Mater. Des. 107, 277 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Q., Deng, Z., Zhang, Z., Liu, Q., Jia, Z., and Huang, G.: Effects of strain rate on flow stress behavior and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu aluminum alloy during hot deformation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 662, 204 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, S.A.M., Shridhar, T.N., and Krishnamurthy, L.: Microstructural characterization and investigation of thermal conductivity behaviour of Al6061–SiC–Gr hybrid metal matrix composites. Int. J. Mater. Sci. 5, 353 (2016).Google Scholar
Mills, K.C.: Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties for Selected Commercial Alloys, Vol. 105 (Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, England, 2002); p. 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, S.I., Semiatin, S.L., and Jonas, J.J.: An analysis of the isothermal hot compression test. Metall. Trans. A 23, 963 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J., Li, M.Q., and Wu, B.: The correlation between flow behavior and microstructural evolution of 7050 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 530, 559 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, G., Li, Z., Li, D., Peng, Y., Zurob, H.S., and Wu, P.: A polycrystal plasticity based discontinuous dynamic recrystallization simulation method and its application to copper. Int. J. Plast. 91, 48 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamani, M., Dini, H., Svoboda, A., Lindgren, L.E., Seifeddine, S., Andersson, N.E., and Jarfors, A.E.W.: A dislocation density based constitutive model for as-cast Al–Si alloys: Effect of temperature and microstructure. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 121, 164 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pu, E., Zheng, W., Song, Z., Feng, H., and Dong, H.: Hot deformation characterization of nickel-based superalloy UNS10276 through processing map and microstructural studies. J. Alloys Compd. 694, 617 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J. and Di, H.: Deformation heating and flow localization in Ti–15–3 metastable β titanium alloy subjected to high Z deformation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 676, 506 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenab, A. and Taheri, A.K.: Experimental investigation of the hot deformation behavior of AA7075: Development and comparison of flow localization parameter and dynamic material model processing maps. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 78, 97 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, K.K., Pancholi, V., Jha, S.K., Chaudhari, G.P., Srivastava, D., and Dey, G.K.: A novel approach to understand the deformation behavior in two phase region using processing map. J. Alloys Compd. 706, 511 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Zhou, J., and Duszczyk, J.: Determination of a constitutive relationship for AZ31B magnesium alloy and validation through comparison between simulated and real extrusion. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 172, 372 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos, J., Rieiro, I., Carsí, M., Muñoz, J., Mehtedi, M., and Ruano, O.A.: Analysis of adiabatic heating and its influence on the Garofalo equation parameters of a high nitrogen steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 517, 191 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar