Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:21:07.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indentation-induced delamination of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon nitride film on gallium arsenide substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

Mingyuan Lu ,
Hongtao Xie ,
Han Huang ,
Jin Zou  and
Yuehui He
Mingyuan Lu
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
Hongtao Xie
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
Han Huang*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
Jin Zou
Affiliation:
Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia; and State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China
Yuehui He
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Nanoindentation was performed on amorphous silicon nitride films of different thicknesses deposited on gallium arsenide (GaAs) (001) substrates using a conical indenter. Both “pop-in” and ‘pop-out’ were observed from the load-displacement curves when the indentation load exceeded a critical value. Pop-in occurring during loading is associated with plane-slip in the GaAs substrate, and pop-out during unloading is attributed to the interfacial delamination between the film and the substrate. Finite element modeling (FEM) was used to analyze the stress evolution during unloading. The FEM results showed that the stress at the interface evolved from compressive to tensile status during the withdrawal of indentation load, and the interfacial debonding was induced at a critical tensile stress, which is consistent with the pop-out observed. A deformation model for interpreting the pop-in and pop-out events is thereby proposed.

Keywords

Nanoindentationpop-inpop-outdelaminationsilicon nitride film
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 28 , Issue 8 , 28 April 2013 , pp. 1047 - 1055
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Smith, F.W., Le, H.Q., Diadiuk, V., Hollis, M.A., Calawa, A.R., Gupta, S., Frankel, M., Dykaar, D.R., Mourou, G.A., and Hsiang, T.Y.: Picosecond GaAs-based photoconductive optoelectronic detectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 890 (1989).Google Scholar
Lam, D.K.W. and Macdonald, R.I.: GaAs optoelectronic mixer operation at 4.5 GHz. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 31, 1766 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Y., Isozaki, T., Masuda, A., Fukumoto, K., Chosa, M., Ito, T., Bauer, C.E., Inspektor, A., and Oles, E.J.: Adhesion strength of diamond film on cemented carbide insert. Diamond Relat. Mater. 2, 1391 (1993).Google Scholar
Yota, J.: Interlevel dielectric processes using PECVD silicon nitride, polyimide, and polybenzoxazole for GaAs HBT technology. J. Electrochem. Soc. 156, G173 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallakoun, I., Toledo, I., Kaplun, J., Bunin, G., Leibovitch, M., and Shapira, Y.: Critical dimension improvement of plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon nitride thin films in GaAs devices. Mater. Sci. Eng., B 102, 352 (2003).Google Scholar
Gioti, M., Logothetidis, S., and Charitidis, C.: Stress relaxation and stability in thick amorphous carbon films deposited in layer structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 184 (1998).Google Scholar
Chang, S-Y., Tsai, H-C., Chang, J-Y., Lin, S-J., and Chang, Y-S.: Analyses of interface adhesion between porous SiOCH low-k film and SiCN layers by nanoindentation and nanoscratch tests. Thin Solid Films 516, 5334 (2008).Google Scholar
Chang, E.Y., Cibuzar, G.T., Vanhove, J.M., Nagarajan, R.M., and Pande, K.P.: GaAs devices passivation using sputtered silicon nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1638 (1988).Google Scholar
Jaouad, A., Aimez, V., and Aktik, C.: GaAs passivation by low-frequency plasma- enhanced chemical vapor deposition of silicon nitride. Electron. Lett. 40, 1024 (2004).Google Scholar
Yeap, K.B., Zeng, K.Y., Jiang, H.Y., Shen, L., and Chi, D.Z.: Determining interfacial properties of submicron low-k films on Si substrate by using wedge indentation technique. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 123531 (2007).Google Scholar
Singh, R.K., Tilbrook, M.T., Xie, Z.H., Bendavid, A., Martin, P.J., Munroe, P., and Hoffman, M.: Contact damage evolution in diamond-like carbon coatings on ductile substrates. J. Mater. Res. 23, 27 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, S.J.: Failure modes in scratch adhesion testing. Surf. Coat. Technol. 50, 25 (1991).Google Scholar
Perry, A.J.: Scratch adhesion testing of hard coatings. Thin Solid Films 107, 167 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J.J. and Bull, S.J.: Approaches to investigate delamination and interfacial toughness in coated systems: An overview. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44(3), 034001 (2011).Google Scholar
Volinsky, A.A., Moody, N.R., and Gerberich, W.W.: Interfacial toughness measurements for thin films on substrates. Acta Mater. 50, 441 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S., Wang, Y.S., Zeng, X.T., Khor, K.A., Weng, W.J., and Sun, D.E.: Evaluation of adhesion strength and toughness of fluoridated hydroxyapatite coatings. Thin Solid Films 516, 5162 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, R.: Measurement of the adhesion of thin films. Thin Solid Films 34, 191 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegemann, D., Brunner, H., and Oehr, C.: Plasma treatment of polymers for surface and adhesion improvement. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 208, 281 (2003).Google Scholar
Kim, J., Kim, K.S., and Kim, Y.H.: Mechanical effects in peel adhesion test. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 3, 175 (1989).Google Scholar
Dauskardt, R.H., Lane, M., Ma, Q., and Krishna, N.: Adhesion and debonding of multilayer thin film structures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 61, 141 (1998).Google Scholar
Litteken, C., Dauskardt, R., Scherban, T., Xu, G., Leu, J., Gracias, D., and Sun, B.: Interfacial adhesion of thin-film patterned interconnect structures. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2003 International, New York, 2003 (IEEE, New York, NY, 2003); p. 168.Google Scholar
DeBoer, M.P. and Gerberich, W.W.: Microwedge indentation of the thin film fine line. 1. Mech. Acta Mater. 44, 3169 (1996).Google Scholar
DeBoer, M.P. and Gerberich, W.W.: Microwedge indentation of the thin film fine line. 2. Exp. Acta Mater. 44, 3177 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S. and Zhang, X.M.: Toughness evaluation of hard coatings and thin films. Thin Solid Films 520, 2375 (2012).Google Scholar
Huang, H., Winchester, K.J., Suvorova, A., Lawn, B.R., Liu, Y., Hu, X.Z., Dell, J.M., and Faraone, L.: Effect of deposition conditions on mechanical properties of low-temperature PECVD silicon nitride films. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 435, 453 (2006).Google Scholar
Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3 (2004).Google Scholar
Huang, H., Winchester, K., Liu, Y., Hu, X.Z., Musca, C.A., Dell, J.M., and Faraone, L.: Determination of mechanical properties of PECVD silicon nitride thin films for tunable MEMS Fabry-Perot optical filters. J. Micromech. Microeng. 15, 608 (2005).Google Scholar
Jung, Y.G., Lawn, B.R., Martyniuk, M., Huang, H., and Hu, X.Z.: Evaluation of elastic modulus and hardness of thin films by nanoindentation. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3076 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needleman, A.: A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 54, 525 (1987).Google Scholar
ANSYS Academic Research Release 13.0, Help System, 4.13. Cohesive Zone Material Model, (ANSYS, Inc., 2007).Google Scholar
Sheng Liu, H.H. and Gu, Y.: Deconvolution of mechanical properties of thin films from nanoindentation measurement via finite element optimization. Thin Solid Films 526, 183 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bourhis, E. and Patriarche, G.: Structure of nanoindentations in heavily n- and p-doped (001) GaAs. Acta Mater. 56(7), 1417 (2008).Google Scholar
Le Bourhis, E. and Patriarche, G.: Structure of annealed nanoindentations in n- and p-doped (001)GaAs. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 123516 (2009).Google Scholar
Taylor, C.R., Malshe, A.P., Salamo, G., Prince, R.N., Riester, L., and Cho, S.O.: Characterization of ultra-low-load (mu N) nanoindents in GaAs(100) using a cube corner tip. Smart Mater. Struct. 14, 963 (2005).Google Scholar
Bradby, J.E., Williams, J.S., Wong-Leung, J., Swain, M.V., and Munroe, P.: Mechanical deformation of InP and GaAs by spherical indentation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3235 (2001).Google Scholar
Lloyd, S.J., Molina-Aldareguia, J.M., and Clegg, W.J.: Deformation under nanoindents in Si, Ge, and GaAs examined through transmission electron microscopy. J. Mater. Res. 16, 3347 (2001).Google Scholar
Hainsworth, S.V., McGurk, M.R., and Page, T.F.: The effect of coating cracking on the indentation response of thin hard-coated systems. Surf. Coat. Technol. 102, 97 (1998).Google Scholar
Chen, J. and Bull, S.J.: Indentation fracture and toughness assessment for thin optical coatings on glass. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, 5401 (2007).Google Scholar
Chen, J. and Bull, S.J.: Finite element analysis of contact induced adhesion failure in multilayer coatings with weak interfaces. Thin Solid Films 517(13), 3704 (2009).Google Scholar