Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:45:09.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of Young's modulus and tensile strength of polymer impregnation and pyrolysis processed SiC/SiC composite by improved continuity of matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

S. Ochiai ,
H. Okuda ,
S. Kimura ,
K. Morishita ,
M. Tanaka ,
M. Hojo  and
M. Sato
S. Ochiai*
Affiliation:
International Innovation Center, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
H. Okuda
Affiliation:
International Innovation Center, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
S. Kimura
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
K. Morishita
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
M. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
M. Hojo
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
M. Sato
Affiliation:
Ube Research Laboratory, Ube Industries Ltd., 1978-5 Kogushi, Ube City,Yamaguchi 755-8633, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Influences of the continuity of the matrix on Young's modulus and tensile strength of unidirectional SiC/SiC mini-composite prepared by the polymer impregnation and pyrolysis method were studied experimentally by observation of appearance of matrix and tensile test and analytically by a shear lag–Monte Carlo simulation. The continuity of the matrix was improved by the addition of particles such as ZrSiO4, barium magnesium aluminosilicate, and Pyrex (borosilicate glass) into the matrix. The improved continuity of the matrix led to the increase in stress carrying capacity of the matrix and therefore to the increase in Young's modulus and tensile strength of the composite. Such a correlation between the continuity of the matrix and the property of the composite was verified numerically by the shear lag–Monte Carlo simulation.

Keywords

CompositeStrengthFracture
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 8 , August 2004 , pp. 2377 - 2388
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Masaki, S., Moria, K., Yamamura, T., Shibuya, M. and Ohnabe, M.: Development of Si-Ti-C-O fiber reinforced SiC composites by chemical vapor infiltration and polymer impregnation and pyrolysis. Ceram. Trans. 58, 187 (1996).Google Scholar
2.Jacques, S., Guette, A., Langlais, F. and Naslain, R.: C(B) materials as interphases in SiC/SiC model microcomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 32, 983 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Nakayasu, T., Sato, M., and Yamamura, T.: Recent advancement of Tyrrano/SiC composites R&D. In Proceedings of 23rd Annual Conference On Composites, Advanced Ceramics, Materials and Structures (1999), Vol. 20B(3), pp. 301–316.Google Scholar
4.Tanaka, Y., Inoue, Y., Miyamoto, N., Sato, M. and Yamamura, T.: Properties of Si-Zr-C-O fiber/SiZrC composites dispersed ZrSiO4 particles in the matrix. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 16, 197 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Ochiai, S., Okumura, I., Tanaka, M., Hojo, M. and Inoue, T.: Influences of residual stresses, frictional shear stress at debonded interface and interactions among broken components on interfacial debonding in unidirectional multi-filamentary composites. Composite Interfaces 5, 363 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Ochiai, S., Hojo, M. and Inoue, T.: Shear lag simulation of progress of interfacial debonding in unidirectional composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 59 77–88 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ochiai, S., Tanaka, M. and Hojo, M.: Approximate solution of interaction among spatially distributed broken fiber, matrix and interface in progress of interfacial debonding in multifilamentary unidirectional composite. JSME International 43, 53 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Ochiai, S., Hojo, M., Schulte, K. and Fiedler, B.: Nondimensional simulation of influence of toughness of interface on tensile stress-strain behavior of unidirectional minicomposite. Composites Part A 32, 749 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Ochiai, S., Fujita, T., Tanaka, M., Hojo, M., Tanaka, R., Miyamura, K., Nakayama, H., Yamamoto, M. and Fujikura, M.: Monte Carlo simulation of tensile fracture behavior of unidirectional fiber reinforced brittle matrix composite with weak interface. J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 64, 7 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ochiai, S., Tanaka, H., Kimura, S., Tanaka, M., Hojo, M. and Okuda, H.: A modeling of residual stress-induced stress-strain behavior of unidirectional brittle fiber/brittle matrix composite with weak interface. Compos. Sci. Technol. 63, 1027 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Weibull, W.: Statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 293 (1951).Google Scholar
12.Ochiai, S. Strength of unnotched composites. In Mechanical Properties of Metallic Composites, edited by Ochiai, S., (Marcel Dekker, 1994), pp. 473–510.Google Scholar
13.Evans, A.G.: The mechanical properties of reinforced ceramic, metal and intermetallic matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 107, 227 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Evans, A.G. and Zok, F.W.: The physics and mechanics of fibre-reinforced brittle matrix composites. J. Mater. Sci. 29, 3857 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Yamada, S., Towata, S., and Ikuno, H.: Mechanical properties of aluminum alloys reinforced with continuous fibers and dispersoids. In Proc. Cast Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites, (ASM, 1988), pp. 109–114.Google Scholar
16.Waku, Y., Yamamoto, T., Suzuki, M., Nakagawa, N. and Nishi, T.: Mechanical properties of Si-Ti-C-O fiber reinforced aluminum composite. Tetsu-to-Hagane 75, 149 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Ochiai, S. and Osamura, K.: Tensile strength of fibre-reinforced metal matrix composites whose fibre spacing is non-uniform. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 3536 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Suyama, S., Kameda, T. and Itho, Y.: Evaluation of microstructure for SiC/SiC composite. Int. J. Mater. Prod. Technol. 16, 232 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kimura, S. Influences of microstructure and high temperature-exposure on fracture behavior of unidirectional SiC/SiC composites. Master Thesis, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan (2001), p. 13.Google Scholar