Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T16:31:39.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hot deformation behavior of Ti–22Al–25Nb alloy by processing maps and kinetic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2016

He Zhang ,
Huijun Li ,
Qianyin Guo ,
Yongchang Liu  and
Liming Yu
He Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Lab of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, People's Republic of China
Huijun Li
Affiliation:
State Key Lab of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, People's Republic of China
Qianyin Guo
Affiliation:
State Key Lab of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, People's Republic of China
Yongchang Liu*
Affiliation:
State Key Lab of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, People's Republic of China
Liming Yu
Affiliation:
State Key Lab of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, School of Materials Science & Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

To study the hot deformation behavior of the Ti–22Al–25Nb alloy, isothermal compression tests were conducted at the temperature range of 930–1080 °C with strain rates of 0.001–1.0 s−1. Both the strain rate and the deformation temperature have a significant influence on the stress–strain behavior of the Ti–22Al–25Nb alloy. A hyperbolic–sine constitutive equation is established to quantitatively demonstrate the relationship between the parameters involved, and the hot deformation activation energy Q is determined as 621 kJ/mol. To optimize the processing window, a hot processing map is established, which is related to the microstructure evolution in hot working. The lamellar globularization as well as the dynamic recrystallization (DRX) would contribute to the stable regions with high power dissipation, while the adiabatic shear bands would lead to unstable regions. Moreover, an Avrami-type kinetics model is applied to examine the evolution of DRX during isothermal deformation process.

Keywords

Ti–22Al–25Nb alloyhot deformationconstitutive equationprocessing mapdynamic recrystallizationkinetics model
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 12 , 28 June 2016 , pp. 1764 - 1772
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gogia, A.K., Nandy, T.K., Banerjee, D., Carisey, T., Strudel, J.L., and Franchet, J.M.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of orthorhombic alloys in the Ti–Al–Nb system. Intermetallics 6, 741–748 (1998).Google Scholar
Nandy, T.K. and Banerjee, D.: Deformation mechanisms in the O phase. Intermetallics 8, 1269–1282 (2000).Google Scholar
Emura, S., Tsuzaki, K., and Tsuchiya, K.: Improvement of room temperature ductility for Mo and Fe modified Ti2AlNb alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 355–362 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L.Q., Zhang, D.T., Liu, Y.C., Ning, B.Q., Qiao, Z.X., Yan, Z.S., and Li, H.J.: Precipitation behavior and martensite lath coarsening during tempering of T/P92 ferritic heat-resistant steel. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 21, 438–447 (2014).Google Scholar
Dey, S.R., Roy, S., Suwas, S., Fundenberger, J.J., and Ray, R.K.: Annealing response of the intermetallic alloy Ti–22Al–25Nb. Intermetallics 18, 1122–1131 (2010).Google Scholar
Dey, S.R., Suwas, S., Fundenberger, J.J., and Ray, R.K.: Evolution of crystallographic texture and microstructure in the orthorhombic phase of a two-phase alloy Ti–22Al–25Nb. Intermetallics 17, 622–633 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, J.B., Zhang, K.F., and Lu, Z.: Dynamic recrystallization kinetics of a powder metallurgy Ti–22Al–25Nb alloy during hot compression. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 607, 630–639 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xue, C., Zeng, W.D., Xu, B., liang, X.B., Zhang, J.W., and Li, S.Q.: B2 grain growth and particle pinning effect of Ti–22Al–25Nb orthorhombic intermetallic alloy during heating process. Intermetallics 29, 41–47 (2012).Google Scholar
Zhou, Y.H., Liu, Y.C., Zhou, X.S., Liu, C.X., Yu, L.M., Li, C., and Ning, B.Q.: Processing maps and microstructural evolution of the type 347H austenitic heat-resistant stain less steel. J. Mater. Res. 30, 2090–2100 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X.S., Liu, C.X., Yu, L.M., Liu, Y.C., and Li, H.J.: Phase transformation behavior and microstructural control of high-Cr martensitic/ferritic heat-resistant steels for power and nuclear plants: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 31, 235–242 (2015).Google Scholar
Prasad, Y., Gegel, H., Doraivelu, S., Malas, J., Morgan, J., Lark, K., and Barker, D.: Modeling of dynamic material behavior in hot deformation: Forging of Ti-6242. Metall. Trans. A 15, 1883–1892 (1984).Google Scholar
Samantaray, D., Mandal, S., and Bhaduri, A.: Characterization of deformation instability in modified 9Cr–1Mo steel during thermo-mechanical processing. Mater. Des. 32, 716–722 (2011).Google Scholar
Al-Samman, T. and Gottstein, G.: Dynamic recrystallization during high temperature deformation of magnesium. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 490, 411–420 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, H.T., Li, Q.B., Zhao, Z.K., Liu, Z.C., Wen, S.F., and Wang, Q.D.: Hot workability characteristics of magnesium alloy AZ80—A study using processing map. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 2022–2026 (2010).Google Scholar
Xu, Y., Hu, L.X., and Sun, Y.: Deformation behaviour and dynamic recrystallization of AZ61 magnesium alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 580, 262–269 (2013).Google Scholar
Lv, B.J., Peng, J., Shi, D.W., Tang, A.T., and Pan, F.S.: Constitutive modeling of dynamic recrystallization kinetics and processing maps of Mg–2.0Zn–0.3Zr alloy based on true stress–strain curves. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 560, 727–733 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, A.B., Huang, L.J., Meng, Q.Y., Geng, L., and Cui, X.P.: Hot working of Ti–6Al–3Mo–2Zr–0.3Si alloy with lamellar α + β starting structure using processing map. Mater. Des. 30, 1625–1631 (2009).Google Scholar
Wang, X., Hamasaki, H., Yamamura, M., Yamauchi, R., Maeda, T., Shirai, Y., and Yoshida, F.: Yield-point phenomena of Ti–20V–4Al–1Sn at 1073K and its constitutive modelling. Mater. Trans. 50, 1576–1578 (2009).Google Scholar
Jia, W.J., Zeng, W.D., Zhou, Y.G., Liu, J.R., and Wang, Q.J.: High-temperature deformation behavior of Ti60 titanium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 4068–4074 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehghan, H., Abbasi, S.M., and Momeni, A.: On the constitutive modeling and microstructural evolution of hot compressed A286 iron-base superalloy. J. Alloys Compd. 564, 13–19 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, G.L., Li, F.G., and Li, Q.H.: A comparative study on Arrhenius-type constitutive model and artificial neural network model to predict high-temperature deformation behaviour in Aermet100 steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 4774–4782 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, H.J. and Imbert, C.A.C.: Dynamic recrystallization: Plasticity enhancing structural development. J. Alloys Compd. 378, 35–43 (2004).Google Scholar
Sellars, C.M. and Tegart, M.W.: On the mechanism of hot deformation. Acta Metall. 14(9), 1136–1138 (1966).Google Scholar
Meng, G., Li, B., Li, H., Huang, H., and Nie, Z.: Hot deformation and processing maps of an Al–5.7wt%Mg alloy with erbium. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 517, 132–137 (2009).Google Scholar
Zener, C. and Hollomon, J.H.: Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel. J. Appl. Phys. 15, 22–32 (1944).Google Scholar
Murty, S.V.S.N., Sarma, M.S., and Rao, B.N.: On the evaluation of efficiency parameters in processing maps. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28, 1581–1582 (1997).Google Scholar
Sellars, C.M. and Tegart, W.J.M.: Hot workability. Int. Metall. Rev. 17, 1–24 (1972).Google Scholar
Sha, W.: Crystallization and nematic–isotropic transition activation energies measured using the Kissinger method. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 80, 2535–2537 (2001).Google Scholar
Sun, Y., Zeng, W.D., Zhao, Y.Q., Zhang, X.M., Shu, Y., and Zhou, Y.G.: Research on the hot deformation behavior of Ti40 alloy using processing map. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528, 1205–1211 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Chang, H., Tang, B., Kou, H.C., and Li, J.S.: Deformation and dynamic recrystallization behavior of a high Nb containing TiAl alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 552, 363–369 (2013).Google Scholar
Fernández, A.I., Uranga, P., López, B., and Rodriguez-Ibabe, J.M.: Dynamic recrystallization behavior covering a wide austenite grain size range in Nb and Nb–Ti microalloyed steels. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 361, 367–376 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Cui, Z., and Ruan, L.: A new kinetics model of dynamic recrystallization for magnesium alloy AZ31B. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 529, 300–310 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, G.L., Li, F.G., Li, Q.H., Li, H.Q., and Li, Z.: Research on the dynamic recrystallization kinetics of Aermet 100 steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527, 2350–2355 (2010).Google Scholar
Najafizadeh, A. and Jonas, J.J.: Predicting the critical stress for initiation of dynamic recrystallization. ISIJ Int. 46, 1679–1684 (2006).Google Scholar
Quan, G.Z., Wu, D.S., Luo, G.C., Xia, Y.F., Zhou, J., Liu, Q., and Gao, L.: Dynamic recrystallization kinetics in α phase of as-cast Ti–6Al–2Zr–1Mo–1V alloy during compression at different temperatures and strain rates. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 589, 23–33 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar