Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:09:14.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-temperature Dislocation-precipitate Interactions in Al Alloys: An in situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Deformation Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2005

B.G. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801
I.M. Robertson*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801
L.M. Dougherty
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801
D.C. Ahn
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801
P. Sofronis
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected] This author was an editor of this focus issue during the review and decision stage. For the JMR policy on review and publication of manuscripts authored by editors, please refer to http://www.mrs.org/publications/jmr/policy.html.
Get access

Abstract

The fundamental processes controlling the high-temperature interaction of dislocations with precipitates in Al-alloys were investigated in real time by deforming specimens in situ in the transmission electron microscope at elevated temperature. The observations support a bypass mechanism involving the interaction of lattice dislocations with the precipitate–matrix interface dislocations, where the rate-limiting step in the interaction is the release of the dislocation from the particle. These observations are discussed in relation to high-temperature deformation processes and models.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Hull, D. and Bacon, D.J.: Introduction to Dislocations, 4th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K., 2001), p. 222.Google Scholar
2Brown, L.M. and Ham, R.K. Dislocation–particle interactions, in Strengthening Methods in Crystals, edited by Kelly, A. and Nicholson, R.B. (Elsevier, New York, NY, 1971), pp. 9135.Google Scholar
3Lagneborg, R. and Bergman, B.: The stress/creep rate behavior of precipitation-hardened alloys. Metal Sci. 10(1), 20 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Arzt, E. and Wilkinson, D.S.: Threshold stresses for dislocation climb over hard particles: The effect of an attractive interaction. Acta Metall. 34, 1893 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Rösler, J. and Arzt, E.: A new model-based creep equation for dispersion strengthened materials. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 671 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Arzt, E., Dehm, G., Gumbsch, P., Kraft, O. and Weiss, D.: Interface controlled plasticity in metals: Dispersion hardening and thin film deformation. Prog. Mater. Sci. 46, 283 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Mishra, R.S., Nandy, T.K. and Greenwood, G.W.: The threshold stress for creep controlled by dislocation-particle interaction. Philos. Mag. A 69, 1097 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Dougherty, L.M. Mechanisms operating during continuous dynamic recrystallization in an Al–4Mg–0.3Sc alloy, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (2003).Google Scholar
9 Properties and selection: Nonferrous alloys and pure metals, in ASM Metals Handbook, Vol. 2 (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1979).Google Scholar
10Fukunaga, K. and Miura, Y.: Electron microscopic analysis of dislocation strucutres in l12-al3sc intermetallic compound. J. Jpn. Inst. Metals 62, 369 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Iwamura, S., Nakayama, M. and Miura, Y.: Coherency between Al3Sc precipitate and the matrix in al alloys containing Sc. Mater. Sci, Forum 396–402, 1151 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Stiffler, R.W. Hyland Jr.and R.C.: Determination of the elastic constants of polycrystalline al3sc. Scripta Metall. Mater. 25, 473 (1991).Google Scholar
13Harada, Y. and Dunand, D.C.: Thermal expansion of Al3Sc and Al3(Sc0.75X0.25). Scripta Mater. 48, 219 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Pearson, W.B.: A Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys, Vol. 2 (Pergamon Press, New York, 1967).Google Scholar
15Reppich, B.: On the attractive particle-dislocation interaction in dispersion-strengthened material. Acta Mater. 46, 61 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Marquis, E.A. and Dunand, D.C.: Model for creep threshold stress in precipitation-strengthened alloys with coherent particles. Scripta Mater. 47, 503 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Kudashov, D.V., Martin, U., Heilmaier, M. and Oettel, H.: Creep behaviour of ultrafine-grained oxide dispersion strengthened copper prepared by cryomilling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 387–389,639 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Bartsch, M., Wasilkowska, A., Czyrska-Filemonowicz, A. and Messerschmidt, U.: Dislocation dynamics in the oxide dispersion strengthened alloy incoloy MA956. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 272, 152 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Häussler, D., Reppich, B., Bartsch, M. and Messerschmidt, U.: Interaction processes between dislocations and particles in the ODS nickel-base superalloy inconel ma 754 studied by means of in situ straining in an hvem. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 309–310, 500 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Häussler, D., Bartsch, M., Messerschmidt, U. and Reppich, B.: HVTEM in situ observations of dislocation motion in the oxide dispersion strengthened superalloy MA754. Acta Mater. 49, 3647 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Srolovitz, D.J., Petkovic-Luton, R.A. and Luton, M.J.: Diffusional relaxation of the dislocation-inclusion repulsion. Philos. Mag. A 48, 795 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar