Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:56:31.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-strain-rate dynamic mechanical behavior of a bulk metallic glass composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Morgana Martin ,
Laszlo Kecskes  and
Naresh N. Thadhani
Morgana Martin
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Laszlo Kecskes
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, AMSRD-ARL-WM-MB, Deer Creek Loop, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005-5069
Naresh N. Thadhani*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The high-strain-rate mechanical properties, deformation mechanisms, and fracture characteristics of a bulk metallic glass (BMG)-matrix composite, consisting of an amorphous Zr57Nb5Cu15.4Ni12.6Al10 (LM106) matrix with crystalline tungsten reinforcement particles, were investigated using gas gun anvil-on-rod impact experiments instrumented with velocity interferometry (VISAR) and high-speed digital photography. The time-resolved elastic-plastic wave propagation response obtained through VISAR and the transient deformation states captured with the camera provided information about dynamic strength and deformation modes of the composite. Comparison of experimental measurements with AUTODYN-simulated transient deformation profiles and free surface velocity traces allowed for validation of the pressure-hardening Drucker–Prager model, which was used to describe the deformation response of the composite. The impacted specimens recovered for post-impact microstructural analysis provided further information about the mechanisms of dynamic deformation and fracture characteristics. The overall results from experiments and modeling revealed a strain to failure of ∼45% along the length and ∼7% in area, and the fracture initiation stress was found to decrease with increasing impact velocity because of the negative strain-rate sensitivity of the BMG.

Keywords

AmorphousFracture
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , April 2008 , pp. 998 - 1008
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Inoue, A.: Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 48, 279 2000Google Scholar
2Jiao, T., Kecskes, L.J., Hufnagel, T.C.Ramesh, K.T.: Deformation and failure of Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6/W particle composites under quasi-static and dynamic compression. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35, 3439 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Choi-Yim, H., Conner, R.D., Szuecs, F.Johnson, W.L.: Processing, microstructure and properties of ductile metal particulate reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 bulk metallic glass composites. Acta Mater. 50, 2737 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Choi-Yim, H., Busch, R., Koster, U.Johnson, W.L.: Synthesis and characterization of particulate reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 bulk metallic glass composites. Acta Mater. 47, 2455 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Conner, R.D., Choi-Yim, H.Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 metallic glass matrix particulate composites. J. Mater. Res. 14, 3292 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Choi-Yim, H., Schroers, J.Johnson, W.L.: Microstructures and mechanical properties of tungsten wire/particle reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 metallic glass matrix composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1906 2002Google Scholar
7Choi-Yim, H., Conner, R.D., Szuecs, F.Johnson, W.L.: Quasistatic and dynamic deformation of tungsten reinforced Zr57Nb5Al10Cu15.4Ni12.6 bulk metallic glass matrix composites. Scripta Mater. 45, 1039 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Lowhaphandu, P., Ludrosky, L.A., Montgomery, S.L.Lewandowski, J.J.: Deformation and fracture toughness of a bulk amorphous Zr–Ti–Ni–Cu–Be alloy. Intermetallics 8, 487 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Conner, R.D., Dandliker, R.B.Johnson, W.L.: Mechanical properties of tungsten and steel fiber reinforced Zr41.25Ti13.75Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 metallic glass matrix composites. Acta Mater. 46, 6089 1998Google Scholar
10Fan, C.Inoue, A.: Ductility of bulk nanocrystalline composites and metallic glasses at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 46 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Xing, L.Q., Eckert, J., Loser, W.Schultz, L.: High-strength materials produced by precipitation of icosahedral quasicrystals in bulk Zr–Ti–Cu–Ni–Al amorphous alloys. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 664 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P.Johnson, W.L.: Microstructure controlled shear band pattern formation and enhanced plasticity of bulk metallic glasses containing in-situ formed ductile phase dendrite dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 2000Google Scholar
13Li, H., Subhash, G., Gao, X-L., Kecskes, L.J.Dowding, R.J.: Negative strain rate sensitivity and compositional dependence of fracture strength in Zr/Hf based bulk metallic glasses. Scripta Mater. 49, 1087 2003Google Scholar
14Li, H., Subhash, G., Kecskes, L.J.Dowding, R.J.: Mechanical behavior of tungsten preform reinforced bulk metallic glass composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 403, 134 2005Google Scholar
15Taylor, G.I.: The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress. I: Theoretical considerations. Proc. R. Soc. London A 194, 289 1948Google Scholar
16Barker, L.M.: Velocity interferometry for time-resolved high-velocity measurements in Proceedings of SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering 1983 116–126Google Scholar
17Eakins, D.E.Thadhani, N.N.: Instrumented Taylor anvil-on-rod impact tests for validating applicability of standard strength models to transient deformation states. J. Appl. Phys. 100, 073503 2006Google Scholar
18Martin, M., Thadhani, N.N., Kecskes, L.J.Dowding, R.J.: Instrumented anvil-on-rod impact testing of a bulk metallic glass composite for constitutive model validation. Scripta Mater. 55, 1019 2006Google Scholar
19Eakins, D.E.Thadhani, N.N.: Analysis of dynamic mechanical behavior in reverse Taylor anvil-on-rod impact tests. Int. J. Impact Eng. 34, 1821 2007Google Scholar
20Martin, M., Hanagud, S.Thadhani, N.N.: Mechanical behavior of nickel + aluminum powder-reinforced epoxy composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 443, 209 2007Google Scholar
21Martin, M., Mishra, A., Meyers, M.Thadhani, N.N.: Instrumented anvil-on-rod tests for constitutive model validation and determination of strain-rate sensitivity of ultrafine-grained copper. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 464, 202 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Zhang, Z.F., Eckert, J.Schultz, L.: Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3. Acta Mater. 51, 1167 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Donovan, P.E.: A yield criterion for Pd40Ni40P20 metallic glass. Acta Mater. 37, 445 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Schuh, C.A.Nieh, T.G.: A nanoindentation study of serrated flow in bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 51, 87 2003Google Scholar
25Donovan, P.E.: Compressive deformation of amorphous Pd40Ni40P20. Acta Mater. 37, 445 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Davis, L.A.Kavesh, S.: Deformation and Fracture of an amorphous metallic alloy at high pressure. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 10, 453 1975Google Scholar
27Li, J.X., Shan, G.B., Gao, K.W., Qiao, L.J.Chu, W.Y.: In situ study of formation and growth of shear bands and microcracks in bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 354, 337 2003Google Scholar
28Patnaik, M.N.M., Narasimhan, R.Ramamurty, U.: Spherical indentation response of metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 52, 3335 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Wright, W.J., Schwarz, R.B.Nix, W.D.: Serrated plastic flow in bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 319–321, 229 2001Google Scholar
30Takayama, S.: Serrated plastic flow in metallic glasses. Scripta Metall. 13, 463 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Liu, C.T., Heatherly, L., Easton, D.S., Carmichael, C.A., Schneiberl, J.H.Chen, C.H.: Test environments and mechanical properties of Zr-base bulk amorphous alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 29, 1811 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Lowhaphandu, P., Montgomery, S.L.Lewandowski, J.J.: Effects of superimposed hydrostatic pressure on flow and fracture of a Zr–Ti–Ni–Cu–Be bulk amorphous alloy. Scripta Mater. 41, 19 1999Google Scholar
33Lund, A.C.Schuh, C.A.: The Mohr–Coulomb criterion from unit shear processes in metallic glass. Intermetallics 12, 1159 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Vaidyanathan, R., Dao, M., Ravichandran, G.Suresh, S.: Study of mechanical deformation in bulk metallic glass though instrumented indentation. Acta Mater. 49, 3781 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Drucker, D.C.Prager, W.: Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Q. Appl. Math. 10, 157 1952Google Scholar
36Lu, J.: Mechanical behavior of a bulk metallic glass and its composite over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures. PhD. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA,2002Google Scholar
37AUTODYN 6.0 Manual Century Dynamics Cannonsburg, PAGoogle Scholar
38Rohr, I., Nahme, H.Thoma, K.: Material characterization and constitutive modelling of ductile high strength steel for a wide range of strain rates. Int. J. Impact Eng. 31, 401 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Novikov, S.A., Divnov, I.I.Ivanov, A.G.: The study of fracture of steel, aluminum and copper under explosive loading. Phys. Met. Met. Sci. 21, 608 1966Google Scholar