Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:26:31.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fabrication of micropit structures on Ti6Al4V alloy using fluoride-free anodization for orthopedic applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2019

Merve İzmir
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
Batur Ercan*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey; and Biomedical Engineering Program, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Ti6Al4V alloy is commonly used in hip and knee replacements due to its high strength, ductility, wear, and corrosion resistance. Despite its optimal physical and chemical properties, Ti6Al4V based orthopedic implants have a limited lifetime of only 15–20 years. One of the main reasons for having limited lifetime is the suboptimal integration of Ti6Al4V implants with the juxtaposed bone tissue (osseointegration). To enhance osseointegration, and thus prolong the lifetime of orthopedic implants, Ti6Al4V implants surfaces were modified to have bioactive properties using electrochemical anodization process. In this work, oxide based micropit structures were fabricated on Ti6Al4V surfaces using a fluoride-free electrolyte consisting of NH4Cl in distilled water. Micropit structures were characterized for their surface morphology, crystallinity, and chemistry before and after high temperature crystallization heat treatment. Upon interaction of Ti6Al4V samples with simulated body fluid up to 30 days, enhanced calcium phosphate mineral deposition was observed on anodized surfaces.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Patel, S., Hamlekhan, A., Royhman, D., Butt, A., Yuan, J., Shokuhfar, T., Sukotjo, C., Mathew, M., Jursich, G., and Takoudis, C.: Enhancing surface characteristics of Ti–6Al–4V for bio-implants using integrated anodization and thermal oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 3597 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, M.: Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World J. Clin Cases. 3, 52 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramiah, R.D., Ashmore, A.M., Whitley, E., and Banniste, G.C.: Ten-year life expectancy after primary total hip replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 89–B, 1299 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sansone, V.: The effects on bone cells of metal ions released from orthopaedic implants. A review. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 10, 34 (2013).Google Scholar
Li, B. and Webster, T.: Orthopedic Biomaterials: Advances and Applications, Vol. 1 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017); p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, L.E., Culliford, D., Monk, A.P., Glyn-Jones, S., Prieto-Alhambra, D., Judge, A., and Price, A.J.: The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: A population-based cohort study. Lancet 389, 1424 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, C., Jiang, C., Peng, M., Li, T., Yang, Z., Liu, Z., and Wang, J.: Proinflammatory and osteolysis-inducing effects of 3D printing Ti6Al4V particles in vitro and in vivo. RSC Adv. 8, 2229 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T.J. and Ejiofor, J.U.: Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 25, 4731 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, J. and Luan, B.L.: Nanometer-scale surface modification of Ti6Al4V alloy for orthopedic applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 84, 63 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, T.J.: Anodizing color coded anodized Ti6Al4V medical devices for increasing bone cell functions. Int. J. Nanomed. 8, 109 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duraccio, D., Mussano, F., and Faga, M.G.: Biomaterials for dental implants: Current and future trends. J. Mater. Sci. 50, 4779 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macak, J.M., Tsuchiya, H., Taveira, L., Ghicov, A., and Schmuki, P.: Self-organized nanotubular oxide layers on Ti–6Al–7Nb and Ti–6Al–4V formed by anodization in NH4F solutions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 75, 928 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stępień, M., Handzlik, P., and Fitzner, K.: Electrochemical synthesis of oxide nanotubes on Ti6Al7Nb alloy and their interaction with the simulated body fluid. J. Solid State Electrochem. 20, 2651 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, C., Panaitescu, E., Willey, R., and Menon, L.: Titania nanotubes prepared by anodization in fluorine-free acids. J. Mater. Res. 22, 1624 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, I.S., Oh, H.J., and Bae, T.S.: Bioactivity and generation of anodized nanotubular TiO2 layer of Ti–6Al–4V alloy in glycerol solution. Thin Solid Films 548, 292 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheong, Y.L., Yam, F.K., Ng, S.W., Hassan, Z., Ng, S.S., and Low, I.M.: Fabrication of titanium dioxide nanotubes in fluoride-free electrolyte via rapid breakdown anodization. J. Porous Mater. 22, 1437 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishibashi, K., Yamaguchi, R., Kimura, Y., and Niwano, M.: Fabrication of titanium oxide nanotubes by rapid and homogeneous anodization in perchloric acid/ethanol mixture. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, K10 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, X., Kim, H., Kawashita, M., Wang, L., Kokubo, T.T., and Nakamura, T.: Apatite formation on anodized Ti–6Al–4V alloy in simulated body fluid. Met. Mater. Int. 16, 407 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayanan, R. and Seshadri, S.: Phosphoric acid anodization of Ti–6Al–4V Structural and corrosion aspects. Corros. Sci. 49, 542 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa, M.V.: Electrochemical deposition of bioactive coatings on Ti and Ti–6Al–4V surfaces. Surf. Coat. Technol. 205, 4776 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, S.B.: Functionalization and characterization of CP-Ti and Ti–6Al–4V surfaces for biomedical implants. Master thesis, Vol. 44, University of Illinois, Chicago, 2013.Google Scholar
López-Huerta, F., Cervantes, B., González, O., Hernández-Torres, J., García-González, L., Vega, R., Herrera-May, A.L., and Soto, E.: Biocompatibility and surface properties of TiO2 thin films deposited by DC magnetron sputtering. Materials 7, 4105 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervantes, B., López-Huerta, F., Vega, R., Hernández-Torres, J., García-González, L., Salceda, E., Herrera-May, A.L., and Soto, E.: Cytotoxicity evaluation of anatase and rutile TiO2 thin films on CHO-K1 cells in vitro. Materials 9, 619 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., Chen, J., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Li, W., and Yu, H.: Self-induced synthesis of phase-junction TiO2 with a tailored rutile to anatase ratio below phase transition temperature. Sci. Rep. 6, 1 (2016).Google ScholarPubMed
Patel, S., Hamlekhan, A., Royhman, D., Butt, A., Yuan, J., Shokuhfar, T., and Takoudis, C.G.: Enhancing surface characteristics of Ti–6Al–4V for bio-implants using integrated anodization and thermal oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 3597 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macak, J.M., Tsuchiya, H., Ghicov, A., Yasuda, K., Hahn, R., Bauher, S., and Schumiki, P.: TiO2 nanotubes: Self-organized electrochemical formation, properties and applications. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 11, 3 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokubo, T. and Takadama, H.: How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27, 2907 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

İzmir and Ercan supplementary material

Figures S1-S5

Download İzmir and Ercan supplementary material(File)
File 5.1 MB