Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2011
We like to take this opportunity to rectify an error in the schematic drawing in two of our recently published research articles. A typographical error of a number appeared in Fig. 5 of J. Mater. Res. 20, 2225 (2005), p. 2229 and in Fig. 2 of J. Mater. Res. 21, 947 (2006), p. 948: these two figures are the same schematic drawing. In both figures, the number “1” on the slopes should be changed to “2.” The correct figure is given as Fig. 1 in this erratum.