Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:06:44.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elimination of Au-embrittlement in solder joints on Au/Ni metallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

M.O. Alam ,
Y.C. Chan  and
K.N. Tu
M.O. Alam
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
Y.C. Chan*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
K.N. Tu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1595
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author.e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Systematic experimental work was carried out to understand the mechanism of Au diffusion to the solder interface, and a novel method was proposed to eliminate Au embrittlement by circumventing the continuous layer of (Au,Ni)Sn4 at the solder interface. Contrary to the usual expectation, it was determined that utilization of a very thin Ni metallization in the Au/Ni/Cu under bump metallization (UBM) was an effective means of maintaining mechanical integrity of the solder joint. It was found that the out-diffusion of Cu during the aging period changes the chemistry and morphology of the intermetallic compounds at the interface.

Keywords

EmbrittlementMorphologyDiffusion
Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , May 2004 , pp. 1303 - 1306
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Zeng, K. and Tu, K.N., Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. R38, 55 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Puttlitz, K. and Totta, P.A., Area Array Interconnection Handbook (Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Tu, K.N., Gusak, A.M. and Li, M., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1335 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Tompkins, H.G. and Pinnel, M.R., J. Appl. Phys. 48,3144 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Chow, K.M., Ng, W.Y. and Yeung, L.K., Surf. Coat. Technol. 105, 56 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Alam, M.O., Chan, Y.C. and Hung, K.C., J. Electron. Mater. 31, 1117 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Alam, M.O., Chan, Y.C. and Hung, K.C., J. Micro. Reliab. 42, 1065 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Kim, P.G. and Tu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 3822 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lee, J.H., Park, J.H., Lee, Y.H. and Kim, Y.S., J. Mater. Res. 16, 1249 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Song, H.G., Ahn, J.P., Minor, A.M. and Morris, J.J.W., J. Electron. Mater. 30, 409 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Minor, A.M. and Morris, J.W., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 31A, 798 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Ho, C.E., Shiau, L.C. and Kao, C.R., J. Electr. Mater. 31, 1264 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Zribi, A., Chromik, R.R., Presthus, R., Teed, K., Zavalij, L., DeVita, J., Yova, J., Cotts, E.J., Clum, J.A., Erich, R., Primavera, A., Westby, G., Coyle, R.J. and Wenger, G.M., IEEE Trans. Comp. Pack. Technol. 23, 383 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Huang, C.S. and Duh, J.G., J. Mater. Res. 18, 935 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar