Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:20:23.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of stabilization treatment on the precipitation behavior of β phase and stress corrosion for AA5383-H15 alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2019

Yu-Chih Tzeng*
Affiliation:
Department of Power Vehicle and Systems Engineering, Chung-Cheng Institute of Technology, National Defense University, Taoyuan 33551,Taiwan
Chun-Hsien Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Power Vehicle and Systems Engineering, Chung-Cheng Institute of Technology, National Defense University, Taoyuan 33551,Taiwan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article mainly focuses on stabilization treatments that influence stress corrosion resistance of an AA5383-H15 alloy after undergoing sensitization treatment at 100 °C/168 h. The results show that without stabilization of the sensitized AA5383-H15 alloy, the β precipitates are distributed continuously like a mesh at grain boundary, and this is the main cause of intergranular corrosion failure. However, applying 3 different stabilization treatments (220 °C/3 h, 250 °C/3 h, and 280 °C/3 h) to the AA5383-H15 alloy shows a dramatic decrease in the β phase precipitation routes along the grain boundaries after the sensitization treatment, and thus an effective improvement in the corrosion resistance performance of AA5383-H15 alloys. Of all the stabilization treatments, the application of 250 °C/3 h stabilization treatment is found to be most effective. Applying 250 °C/3 h stabilization treatment facilitated partial recrystallization of the matrix, leading to suppress the continuous precipitation of the β phase along the grain boundaries during sensitization but instead precipitate in discontinuous mesh-like distribution, which can decrease its sensitivity to stress corrosion.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charit, I. and Mishra, R.S.: Evaluation of microstructure and superplasticity in friction stir processed 5083 Al alloy. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3329 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcraft, R.C., Wahab, M.A., Viano, D.M., Schumann, G.O., Phillips, R.H., and Ahmed, N.U.: The development of the welding procedures and fatigue of butt-welded structures of aluminium-AA5383. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 92, 60 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschamps, A., Pérone, S., Bréchet, Y., Ehrström, J-C., and Poizat, L.: High temperature cleavage fracture in 5383 aluminum alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 319, 583 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y.K., Wang, S.H., Chen, R.Y., Hsieh, T.S., Tsai, L., and Chiang, C.C.: The effect of heat treatment on the sensitized corrosion of the 5383-H116 Al–Mg alloy. Materials 275, 1 (2017).Google Scholar
Lyndon, J.A., Gupta, R.K., Gibson, M.A., and Birbilis, N.: Electrochemical behaviour of the β-phase intermetallic (Mg2Al3) as a function of pH as relevant to corrosion of aluminium–magnesium alloys. Corros. Sci. 70, 290 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y., Li, Y., Xiao, Z., Liu, Y., Huang, Y., and Ren, X.: Effect of homogenization on the corrosion behavior of 5083-H321 aluminum alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 673, 73 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y.K. and Allen, T.: Direct visualization of β phase causing intergranular forms of corrosion in Al–Mg alloys. Mater. Charact. 80, 76 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, W., Wang, D., Seifi, M., and Lewandowski, J.J.: Anisotropy of corrosion and environmental cracking in AA5083-H128 Al–Mg alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 730, 367 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S., Lim, M.L.C., Hudson, J.L., and Scully, J.R.: Spreading of intergranular corrosion on the surface of sensitized Al–4.4Mg alloys: A general finding. Corros. Sci. 59, 136 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, L. and Allen, T.R.: Effect of thermomechanical treatment on the corrosion of AA5083. Corros. Sci. 52, 548 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holroyd, N.J.H., Burnett, T.L., Seifi, M., and Lewandowski, J.J.: Improved understanding of environment-induced cracking (EIC) of sensitized 5XXX series aluminium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 682, 613 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, C.B. and Gangloff, R.P.: Stress corrosion cracking of Al–Mg alloy 5083 sensitized at low temperature. Corrosion 72, 221 (2016).Google Scholar
Holroyd, N.J.H. and Scamans, G.M.: Environmental degradation of marine aluminum alloys-past, present, and future. Corrosion 72, 136 (2016).Google Scholar
Steiner, M.A. and Agnew, S.R.: Modeling sensitization of Al–Mg alloys via beta-phase precipitation kinetics. Scr. Mater. 102, 55 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, M.L.C., Kelly, R.G., and Scully, J.R.: Overview of intergranular corrosion mechanisms, phenomenological observations, and modeling of AA5083. Corrosion 72, 198 (2016).Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Steiner, M.A., Kairy, S.K., Davies, C.H.J., Agnew, S.R., and Birbilis, N.: Experiment-based modelling of grain boundary β-phase (Mg2Al3) evolution during sensitization of aluminium alloy AA5083. Sci. Rep. 2961, 1 (2017).Google Scholar
Liu, J., Liang, X., and Li, S.: Study of microbiologically induced corrosion action on Al–6Mg–Zr and Al–6Mg–Zr–Sc. J. Rare Earths 25, 609 (2007).Google Scholar
Mikhaylovskay, A.V., Mochugovskiy, A.G., Levchenko, V.S., Tabachkova, N.Y., Mufalo, W., and Portnoy, V.K.: Precipitation behavior of L12 Al3Zr phase in Al–Mg–Zr alloy. Mater. Charact. 139, 30 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, L., Phillippi, M., Tack, W.T., and Wong, C.: Locally reversing sensitization in 5xxx aluminum plate. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 21, 1025 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, R.Y., Chu, H.Y., Lai, C.C., and Wu, C.T.: Effects of annealing temperature on the mechanical properties and sensitization of 5083-H116 aluminum alloy. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part L 229, 339 (2015).Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., Yan, Y., Thomas, S., Davies, C.H.J., and Birbilis, N.: The effect of reversion heat treatment on the degree of sensitisation for aluminium alloy AA5083. Corros. Sci. 126, 324 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, C.H., Wu, C.T., Chen, Y.H., and Lee, S.L.: Effects of annealing temperature on stress corrosion susceptibility of AA5083-H15 alloys. J. Mater. Res. 31, 1163 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Antuono, D.S., Gaies, J., Golumbfskie, W., and Taheri, M.L.: Direct measurement of the effect of cold rolling on β phase precipitation kinetics in 5xxx series aluminum alloys. Acta Mater. 123, 264 (2017).Google Scholar
Zhang, R., Gupta, R.K., Davies, C.H.J., Hodge, A.M., Tort, M., Xia, K., and Birbilis, N.: The influence of grain size and grain orientation on sensitization in AA5083. Corrosion 72, 160 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.F., Polyakov, M.N., Mecklenburg, M., Kassner, M.E., and Hodge, A.M.: The role of grain boundary plane orientation in the beta phase precipitation of an Al–Mg alloy. Scr. Mater. 89, 49 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzeng, Y.C., Chengn, V.S., Nieh, J.K., Bor, H.Y., and Lee, S.L.: Microstructure and thermal stability of A357 alloys with and without the addition of Zr. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 26, 5511 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM G67-04 standard test method for determining the susceptibility to intergranular corrosion of 5XXX series aluminum alloys by mass loss after exposure to nitric acid (NAMLT Test).Google Scholar
Goswami, R. and Holtz, R.L.: Transmission electron microscopic investigations of grain boundary beta phase precipitation in al 5083 aged at 373 K (100 °C). Metall. Mater. Trans. A 44, 1279 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar