Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:07:45.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the pouring temperature by novel synchronous rolling-casting for metal on microstructure and properties of ZLl04 alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Xiaoqiang Luo ,
Qingzhi Yan  and
Zhengyang Li
Xiaoqiang Luo*
Affiliation:
Department of Inorganic Nonmetallic Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China; and Key Lab of Mechanics in Advanced Manufacturing, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Qingzhi Yan
Affiliation:
Department of Inorganic Nonmetallic Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
Zhengyang Li
Affiliation:
Key Lab of Mechanics in Advanced Manufacturing, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A novel synchronous rolling-casting for metal (SRCM) process for producing metal components is developed. In this paper, the microstructure evolution and mechanical property of ZLl04 alloy with different pouring temperatures by SRCM are investigated. In the process, the pouring temperature has great effects on the microstructure and mechanical property primarily through the crystal change in the rolling-casting area. Temperature of liquids and solids of ZL104 alloy is measured by differential scanning calorimetry. Distribution and characteristics of the microstructure of samples are examined by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy dispersive spectrometer. The results show that the samples fabricated by SRCM present uniform structure and good performance with the pouring temperature at 620 °C when the velocity of the substrate is at 10 cm/s. The tensile strength of ZLl04 alloy reaches 211.89 Mpa, while the average vickers hardness is 81.5 HV.

Keywords

alloycastingslurry
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 16 , 29 August 2016 , pp. 2524 - 2530
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnett, E. and Gosselin, C.: Weak support material techniques for alternative additive manufacturing materials. Addit. Manuf. 8, 95–104 (2015).Google Scholar
Turner, B.N. and Gold, S.A.: A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyping J. 21, 250 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, B.N., Strong, R., and Gold, S.A.: A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyping J. 20, 192 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzolani, F.M.: 3D aluminium structures. Thin Wall Struct. 61, 258 (2012).Google Scholar
Orme, M.: On the genesis of droplet stream microspeed dispersions. Phys. Fluids A 3, 2936 (1991).Google Scholar
Rice, C.S., Mendez, P.F., and Barown, S.B.: Metal solid freeform fabrication using semi-solid slurries. JOM 52, 31 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.D. and Deckard, C.R.: Advances in modeling the effects of selected parameters on the SLS process. Rapid Prototyping J. 4, 90 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S.: Selective laser sintering: A qualitative and objective approach. JOM 55, 43 (2000).Google Scholar
Smalley, D.R. and Hull, C.W.: Method of making a three dimensional object by stereolithography. US Patents, US 07/429,435, 1992.Google Scholar
Gardan, J.: Additive manufacturing technologies: State of the art and trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 1, 1605–1615 (2015).Google Scholar
Sun, J., Zhou, W., Huang, D., Fuh, J.Y., and Hong, G.S.: An overview of 3D printing technologies for food fabrication. Food Bioprocess Technol. 1, 3118–3132 (2015).Google Scholar
Monaghan, T., Capel, A.J., Christie, S.D., Harris, R.A., and Friel, R.J.: Solid-state additive manufacturing for metallized optical fiber integration. Composites, Part A 76, 181 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, H.P., Yang, G.Y., Jia, W.P., He, W.W., Lu, S.L., and Qian, M.: Additive manufacturing of a high niobium-containing titanium aluminide alloy by selective electron beam melting. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 636, 103 (2015).Google Scholar
Yang, L., Harrysson, O., West, H., and Cormier, D.: Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing. Int. J. Solids Struct. 69–70, 475 (2015).Google Scholar
Shi, Z.M., Wang, Q., Zhao, G., and Zhang, R.Y.: Effects of erbium modification on the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 aluminum alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 626, 102 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, C.G., Choi, J.S., and Kim, K.H.: The effect of strain rate on macroscopic behavior in the compression forming of semi-solid aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 88, 159 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemings, M.C.: Behavior of metal alloys in the semisolid state. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 22, 269 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S.D., Mandal, A., and Chakraborty, M.: Solid fraction evolution characteristics of semi-solid A356 alloy and in-situ A356-TiB2 composites investigated by differential thermal analysis. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 22, 389 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar