Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:15:16.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Doping-induced simultaneous improvement of strength and ductility in ultrafine grained gold wires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Y.H. Chew*
Affiliation:
Materials and Applications Center, Kulicke & Soffa (S.E.A.) Pte. Ltd., Singapore 569871
C.C. Wong
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
C.D. Breach
Affiliation:
Materials and Applications Center, Kulicke & Soffa (S.E.A.) Pte. Ltd., Singapore 569871
F. Wulff
Affiliation:
Materials and Applications Center, Kulicke & Soffa (S.E.A.) Pte. Ltd., Singapore 569871
T.Y. Lew
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The room temperature tensile properties of ultrafine-grained 25-μm gold wires were evaluated as a function of calcium (Ca) doping at various strain rates ranging between 10−3 and 10−1 s−1. Paradoxically, the increased amount of Ca was found to simultaneously increase the strength and ductility of the Au wires. However, based on scanning electron microscopy and tensile characterization, the grain size distributions, strain-hardening rate, and strain rate sensitivity of Au wires did not change with Ca, thus showing that neither grain refinement nor plastic instability are likely to be responsible for the concurrent improvement of strength and ductility.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Wang, Y.M., Ma, E., and Chen, M.W.: Enhanced tensile ductility and toughness in nanostructured Cu. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2395 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Koch, C.C.: Optimization of strength and ductility in nanocrystalline and ultrafine grained metals. Scripta Mater. 49, 657 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Wang, Y.M. and Ma, E.: Three strategies to achieve uniform tensile deformation in a nanostructured metal. Acta Mater. 52, 1699 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Valiev, R.Z. and Alexandrov, I.V.: Paradox of strength and ductility in metals processed by severe plastic deformation. J. Mater. Res. 17, 5 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5He, G., Eckert, J., Loser, W., and Schultz, L.: Novel Ti-base nanostructure-dendrite composite with enhanced plasticity. Nat. Mater. 33, 2 (2003).Google Scholar
6Zimmerman, A.F., Palumbo, G., Aust, K.T., and Erb, U.: Mechanical properties of nickel silicon carbide nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 328, 137 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Song, R., Ponge, D., and Raabe, D.: Improvement of the work hardening rate of ultrafine grained steels through second phase particles. Scripta Mater. 52, 1075 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Sun, B.B., Sui, M.L., Wang, Y.M., He, G., Eckert, J., and Ma, E.: Ultrafine composite microstructure in a bulk Ti alloy for high strength, strain hardening and tensile ductility. Acta Mater. 54, 1349 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 American Society for Texting Materials Standard Methods: of Testing Fine Round and Flat Wire for Electron Devices and Lamps, F 219, December 10, 1996.Google Scholar
10Herklotz, G., Schrapler, L., Simons, C., Reuel, J., and Cho, Y.C.: U.S. Patent No. 6,242,106 B1, June 5, 2001.Google Scholar
11Kang, D.W.: U.S. Patent No. 5,993,735, November 30, 1999.Google Scholar
12Wei, Q., Cheng, S., Ramesh, K.T., and Ma, E.: Effect of nanocrystalline and ultrafine grain sizes on the strain rate sensitivity and activation volume: fcc versus bcc metals. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 381, 71 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Schwaiger, R., Moser, B., Dao, M., Chollacoop, N., and Suresh, S.: Some critical experiments on the strain-rate sensitivity of nanocrystalline nickel. Acta Mater. 51, 5159 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Lu, L., Li, S.X., and Lu, K.: An abnormal strain rate effect on tensile behavior in nanocrystalline copper. Scripta Mater. 45, 1163 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Torre, F.D., Swygenhoven, H.V., and Victoria, M.: Nanocrystalline electrodeposited Ni: Microstructure and tensile properties. Acta Mater. 50, 3957 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Noguchi, K., Araki, M., and Ohno, Y.: The preparation of transmission electron microscopy specimens of as-drawn gold wire. Scripta Mater. 43, 199 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Kim, K.S., Song, J.Y., Chung, E.K., Park, J.K., and Hong, S.H.: Relationship between mechanical properties and microstructure of ultra-fine gold bonding wires. Mech. Mater. 38, 119 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Wang, Y.M. and Ma, E.: Strain hardening, strain rate sensitivity, and ductility of nanostructured metals. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 375–377, 46 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Dieter, G.E.: Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, Boston, 1986).Google Scholar
20Hayes, R.W., Witkin, D., Zhou, F., and Lavernia, E.J.: Deformation and activation volumes of cryomilled ultrafine-grained aluminium. Acta Mater. 52, 4259 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Conrad, H. and Narayan, J.: Mechanisms for grain size hardening and softening in Zn. Acta Mater. 50, 5067 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Binary Alloy Phase Diagram, edited by Massalski, T.B. (American Society for Metals Metal Park, OH, 1986).Google Scholar
23Yin, W.M., Whang, S.H., and Mirshams, R.A.: Effect of interstitial on tensile strength and creep in nanostructured Ni. Acta Mater. 53, 383 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Liu, F. and Kirchheim, R.: Nano-scale grain growth inhibited by reducing grain boundary energy through solute segregation. J. Cryst. Growth 264, 385 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Hull, D. and Bacon, D.J.: Introduction to Dislocations, 4th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2001).Google Scholar
26Zhang, X., Wang, R., and Koch, C.C.: Mechanical behaviour of bulk ultrafine-grained and nanocrystalline Zn. Mater. Sci. 6, 53 (2004).Google Scholar
27Kulicke, & Soffa, : Internal report (Kulicke & Soffa [S.E.A.], Singapore, 2004).Google Scholar
28Reed-Hill, R.E.: Physical Metallurgy Principle, 2nd ed. (D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
29Emery, R.D. and Povirk, G.L.: Tensile behavior of free-standing gold films. Part II. Fine-grained films. Acta Mater. 51, 2079 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Valiev, R.Z.: Structure and mechanical properties of ultrafine-grained metals. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 234-236, 59 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Herklotz, G., Schrapler, L., Simons, C., Reuel, J., and Cho, Y.C.: U.S. Patent No. 6,242,106 B1, June 5, 2001.Google Scholar
32Hosoda, N., Tanaka, M., and Mori, T.: U.S. Patent No. 4,885,135, January 9, 1989.Google Scholar
33Porter, D.A. and Easterling, K.E.: Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 2nd ed. (Chapman & Hall, London, 1991).Google Scholar
34Chemistry CRC Handbook of 1999-2000 Physics A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data, 81st ed., edited by Kerr, J.A. and Lide, D.R. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000).Google Scholar
35Chew, Y.H., Wong, C.C., Breach, C.D., Wulff, F., Lin, T.T., and He, C.B.: Effects of Ca on grain-boundary cohesion in Au ball-bonding wire. Thin Solid Films 5.4, 346 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar