Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:43:03.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deformation mechanisms and defect tolerance in the microstructure of 3D-printed alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2020

Matthew Moneghan ,
Christopher Williams  and
Reza Mirzaeifar
Matthew Moneghan
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
Christopher Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
Reza Mirzaeifar*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A novel approach is utilized to investigate the deformation mechanisms at the microstructural level in 3D-printed alloys. The complex formation methods leave a unique and complicated microstructure in the as-built 3D-printed alloys. The microstructure is three leveled, composed of meltpools, grains, and cells. Deformation mechanisms in this microstructure are still highly unexplored due to the complexities of analysis at this scale. To understand these, we establish an image processing framework that converts scanning electron microscope (SEM) images directly into models that are scaled up and 3D printed with representative stiff and soft materials for the proposed material types within the body. These bodies are loaded in uniaxial tension with digital image correlation to study the strain gradient and stress delocalization as a result of the microstructure. The same models were tested through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) with materials similar to reality. Our testing shows the hierarchical material distribution leads to an increased damage tolerance.

Keywords

3D printing metalsadditive manufacturingmicrostructuredefect tolerance
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 35 , Issue 15: Focus Issue: Additive Manufacturing of Metals: Complex Microstructures and Architecture Design , 14 August 2020 , pp. 1984 - 1997
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Yadroitsev, I., Krakhmalev, P., Yadroitsava, I., Johansson, S., and Smurov, I.: Energy input effect on morphology and microstructure of selective laser melting single track from metallic powder. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213, 606–613 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Y.J., Li, Y.Q., Zhu, L.C., Liu, Y., Lei, X.Q., Wang, G., Wu, Y.X., Mi, Z.L., Liu, J.B., Wang, H.T., and Gao, H.J.: Evading the strength-ductility trade-off dilemma in steel through gradient hierarchical nanotwins. Nat. Commun. 5, 8 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucho, W.M., Lysne, V.H., Austbo, H., Sjolyst-Kverneland, A., and Hansen, V.: Investigation of effects of process parameters on microstructure and hardness of SLM manufactured SS3161. J. Alloys Compd. 740, 910–925 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Z.J., Tan, X.P., Tor, S.B., and Chua, C.K.: Simultaneously enhanced strength and ductility for 3D-printed stainless steel 316L by selective laser melting. NPG Asia Mater. 10, 10 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, B., Zhao, X., Li, S., Han, C.J., Wei, Q.S., Wen, S.F., Liu, J., and Shi, Y.S.: Differences in microstructure and properties between selective laser melting and traditional manufacturing for fabrication of metal parts: A review. Front. Mech. Eng. 10, 111–125 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, S., Rauniyar, S., and Chou, K.: Thermo-fluid modeling of selective laser melting: Single-track formation incorporating metallic powder. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28, 611–619 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeidi, K., Kvetkova, L., Lofajc, F., and Shen, Z.J.: Austenitic stainless steel strengthened by the in situ formation of oxide nanoinclusions. RSC Adv. 5, 20747–20750 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeidi, K. and Akhtar, F.: Subgrain-controlled grain growth in the laser-melted 316L promoting strength at high temperatures. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 7 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liverani, E., Toschi, S., Ceschini, L., and Fortunato, A.: Effect of selective laser melting (SLM) process parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 249, 255–263 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, H.Y., Choi, S.J., Prashanth, K.G., Stoica, M., Scudino, S., Yi, S., Kuhn, U., Kim, D.H., Kim, K.B., and Eckert, J.: Fabrication of fe-based bulk metallic glass by selective laser melting: A parameter study. Mater. Des. 86, 703–708 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S.L., Jakus, A.E., Shah, R.N., and Dunand, D.C.: Iron and nickel cellular structures by sintering of 3D-printed oxide or metallic particle inks. Adv. Eng. Mater. 19, 8 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libonati, F., Gu, G.X., Qin, Z., Vergani, L., and Buehler, M.J.: Bone-inspired materials by design: Toughness amplification observed using 3D printing and testing. Adv. Eng. Mater. 18, 1354–1363 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadbakhsh, S., Speirs, M., Kruth, J.P., Schrooten, J., Luyten, J., and Van Humbeeck, J.: Effect of SLM parameters on transformation temperatures of shape memory nickel titanium parts. Adv. Eng. Mater. 16, 1140–1146 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowski, J.J. and Seifi, M.: Metal additive manufacturing: A review of mechanical properties. In Annual Review of Materials Research, Vol. 46, Clarke, D.R., ed. (Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, 2016); pp. 151–186.Google Scholar
Alshare, A.A., Calzone, F., and Muzzupappa, M.: Hydraulic manifold design via additive manufacturing optimized with cfd and fluid–structure interaction simulations. Rapid Prototyp. J. 25, 1516–1524 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soro, N., Attar, H., Brodie, E., Veidt, M., Molotnikov, A., and Dargusch, M.S.: Evaluation of the mechanical compatibility of additively manufactured porous Ti–25Ta alloy for load-bearing implant applications. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 97, 149–158 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sotov, A.V., Agapovichev, A.V., Smelov, V.G., Kokareva, V.V., and Zenina, M.V.: Investigation of the Ni–Co–Cr alloy microstructure for the manufacturing of combustion chamber gte by selective laser melting. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 101, 3047–3053 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadi, A., Mirzaeifar, R., Moghaddam, N.S., Turabi, A.S., Karaca, H.E., and Elahinia, M.: Effect of manufacturing parameters on mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated by selective laser melting: A computational framework. Mater. Des. 112, 328–338 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J.P., Shin, G.H., Brochu, M., Kim, Y.J., Yang, S.S., Kim, K.T., Yang, D.Y., Lee, C.W., and Yu, J.H.: Densification behavior of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated by selective laser melting by variation in laser energy density. Mater. Trans. 57, 1952–1959 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farshidianfar, M.H., Khajepour, A., and Gerlich, A.P.: Effect of real-time cooling rate on microstructure in laser additive manufacturing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 231, 468–478 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunze, K., Etter, T., Grasslin, J., and Shklover, V.: Texture, anisotropy in microstructure and mechanical properties of IN738LC alloy processed by selective laser melting (SLM). Mater. Sci. Eng., A 620, 213–222 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y.M., Voisin, T., McKeown, J.T., Ye, J.C., Calta, N.P., Li, Z., Zeng, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Roehling, T.T., Ott, R.T., Santala, M.K., Depond, P.J., Matthews, M.J., Hamza, A.V., and Zhu, T.: Additively manufactured hierarchical stainless steels with high strength and ductility. Nat. Mater. 17, 63–71 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rannar, L.E., Koptyug, A., Olsen, J., Saeidi, K., and Shen, Z.J.: Hierarchical structures of stainless steel 316L manufactured by electron beam melting. Addit. Manuf. 17, 106–112 (2017).Google Scholar
Zhong, Y., Liu, L.F., Wikman, S., Cui, D.Q., and Shen, Z.J.: Intragranular cellular segregation network structure strengthening 316L stainless steel prepared by selective laser melting. J. Nucl. Mater. 470, 170–178 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasa, E. and Kruth, J.P.: Microstructural investigation of selective laser melting 316L stainless steel parts exposed to laser re-melting. Procedia Eng. 19, 389–395 (2011).Google Scholar
Saeidi, K., Gao, X., Lofaj, F., Kvetkova, L., and Shen, Z.J.: Transformation of austenite to duplex austenite-ferrite assembly in annealed stainless steel 316L consolidated by laser melting. J. Alloys Compd. 633, 463–469 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prashanth, K.G. and Eckert, J.: Formation of metastable cellular microstructures in selective laser melted alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 707, 27–34 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saeidi, K., Gao, X., Zhong, Y., and Shen, Z.J.: Hardened austenite steel with columnar sub-grain structure formed by laser melting. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 625, 221–229 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguejio, J., Szmytka, F., Hallais, S., Tanguy, A., Nardone, S., and Martinez, M.G.: Comparison of microstructure features and mechanical properties for additive manufactured and wrought nickel alloys 625. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 764, 12 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X.W., Tan, Y.H., Willy, H.J., Wang, P., Lu, W.H., Cagirici, M., Ong, C.Y.A., Herng, T.S., Wei, J., and Ding, J.: Heterogeneously tempered martensitic high strength steel by selective laser melting and its micro-lattice: Processing, microstructure, superior performance and mechanisms. Mater. Des. 178, 13 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aboulkhair, N.T., Simonelli, M., Parry, L., Ashcroft, I., Tuck, C., and Hague, R.: 3D printing of aluminium alloys: Additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys using selective laser melting. Prog. Mater. Sci. 106, 45 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J.Y., Huang, Y., and Ortiz, M.: Fracture analysis of cellular materials: A strain gradient model. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46, 789–828 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, X.H., Zhou, X., Xu, B., Ma, J., Zhao, C.C., Shen, Z.J., and Liu, W.: Morphological development of sub-grain cellular/bands microstructures in selective laser melting. Materials 12, 16 (2019).Google ScholarPubMed
Dong, Z.C., Zhang, X.Y., Shi, W.H., Zhou, H., Lei, H.S., and Liang, J.: Study of size effect on microstructure and mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg samples made by selective laser melting. Materials 11, 14 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirzaeifar, R., Dimas, L.S., Qin, Z., and Buehler, M.J.: Defect-tolerant bioinspired hierarchical composites: Simulation and experiment. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 1, 295–304 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrpouya, M., Gisario, A., Rahimzadeh, A., Nematollahi, M., Baghbaderani, K.S., and Elahinia, M.: A prediction model for finding the optimal laser parameters in additive manufacturing of NiTi shape memory alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 105, 4691–4699 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, W.H. and Ranson, W.F.: Digital imaging techniques in experimental stress-analysis. Opt. Eng. 21, 427–431 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X.M., Chen, H., Qi, X.J., Dou, Q., Fu, C.W., and Heng, P.A.: H-denseunet: Hybrid densely connected unet for liver and tumor segmentation from CT volumes. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 37, 2663–2674 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al Arif, S., Knapp, K., and Slabaugh, G.: Fully automatic cervical vertebrae segmentation framework for X-ray images. Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 157, 95–111 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, J.W., Kearney, V., Haaf, S., Wu, S., Bogdanov, M., Reddick, M., Dixit, N., Sudhyadhom, A., Chen, J., Yom, S.S., and Solberg, T.D.: A convolutional neural network algorithm for automatic segmentation of head and neck organs at risk using deep lifelong learning. Med. Phys. 46, 2204–2213 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bass, L., Meisel, N.A., and Williams, C.B.: Exploring variability of orientation and aging effects in material properties of multi-material jetting parts. Rapid Prototyp. J. 22, 826–834 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaber, J., Adair, B., and Antoniou, A.: Ncorr: Open-source 2D digital image correlation matlab software. Exp. Mech. 55, 1105–1122 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W.G., Zhong, R.Z., Qin, Q.H., and Tong, Y.G.: Homogenized finite element analysis on effective elastoplastic mechanical behaviors of composite with imperfect interfaces. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 23389–23407 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed