Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:03:56.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical Examination of the Two-slope Method in Nanoindentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

M. Troyon*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Microscopies et d’Etude de Nanostructures, EA 3799, Université de Reims, 51685 Reims Cedex 2, France
L. Huang
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Microscopies et d’Etude de Nanostructures, EA 3799, Université de Reims, 51685 Reims Cedex 2, France
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we derive corrected analytical expressions for calculating the hardness and modulus by the two-slope method. This method relies on the determination of the slopes of the loading and unloading curves rather than the indenter displacement as an input. These expressions take into account the correction factor α in the fundamental relations among contact stiffness, elastic modulus, and contact area, which is frequently forgotten or misused in the literature. It is shown that these corrected expressions allow measurements of the hardness and modulus in very good agreement with the commonly used technique based on the determination of the contact area. Additionally, the correction factor α can be easily determined if Young's modulus of the material is known.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Oliver, W.C.: Alternative technique for analyzing instrumented indentation data. J. Mater. Res. 16, 3202 (2001).Google Scholar
2Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 564 (1992).Google Scholar
3King, R.B.: Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium. Int. J. Solids Struct. 23, 1657 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Troyon, M. and Huang, L.: About the correction factor for contact area in nanoindentation measurements. J. Mater. Res. 20, 610 (2005).Google Scholar
5Martin, M. and Troyon, M.: Fundamental relations used in nanoindentation: Critical examination based on experimental measurements. J. Mater. Res. 17, 2227 (2002).Google Scholar
6Pharr, G.M., Oliver, W.C. and Brotzen, F.R.: On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation. J. Mater. Res. 7, 613 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hay, J.C., Bolshakov, A. and Pharr, G.M.: A critical examination of the fundamental relations used in the analysis of nanoindentation data. J. Mater. Res. 14, 2296 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar