Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:33:37.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comprehensive analysis on the electrical behavior of highly stretchable carbon nanotubes/polymer composite through numerical simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2018

Xiang Fu ,
Ahmed M. Al-Jumaily ,
Maximiano Ramos  and
Yi-Feng Chen
Xiang Fu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
Ahmed M. Al-Jumaily
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
Maximiano Ramos
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Technologies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
Yi-Feng Chen
Affiliation:
School of Information Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The elastic polymer composite embedded with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is an ideal candidate for stretchable and flexible sensor fabrication due to the perfect combination between the excellent properties of CNTs and the high stretchability of the elastomer. A cube model of nanotube/polymer composite is constructed to comprehensively and theoretically analyze its electrical behavior, which is dominantly governed by the CNT network. The aspect ratio and alignment of CNTs significantly influence both the percolation threshold range and the electrical conductivity; however, the electrical conductivity of CNTs has little impact on the percolation threshold. The piezoresistivity of the composite is not only governed by the property of CNTs but also by the mechanical property of the polymer matrix, including the Poisson’s ratio and alignment of CNTs. The specific reasons why the composite resistance rises when it is stretched are investigated. Finally, one optimizing suggestion is given for making the CNTs/polymer composite with high sensitivity.

Keywords

simulationnanostructurecomposite
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 20 , 29 October 2018 , pp. 3398 - 3407
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Yoon, H. and Jang, J.: Conducting polymer nanomaterials for high performance sensor applications: Issues and challenges. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1567 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgousis, G., Pandis, C., Kalamiotis, A., Georgiopoulos, P., Kyritsis, A., Kontou, E., Pissis, P., Micusik, M., Czanikova, K., and Kulicek, J.: Strain sensing in polymer/carbon nanotube composites by electrical resistance measurement. Composites Part B 68, 162 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, S., Lee, P., Chou, J.B., Xu, R., Zhao, R., Hart, A.J., and Kim, S-G.: Extremely elastic wearable carbon nanotube fiber strain sensor for monitoring of human motion. ACS Nano 9, 5929 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pang, C., Koo, J.H., Nguyen, A., Caves, J.M., Kim, M.G., Chortos, A., Kim, K., Wang, P.J., Tok, J.B.H., and Bao, Z.: Highly skin conformal microhairy sensor for pulse signal amplification. Adv. Mater. 27, 634 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nan, C-W., Shen, Y., and Ma, J.: Physical properties of composites near percolation. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 131 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, N., Fukunaga, H., Atobe, S., Liu, Y., and Li, J.: Piezoresistive strain sensors made from carbon nanotubes based polymer nanocomposites. Sensors 11, 10691 (2011).Google Scholar
Panozzo, F., Zappalorto, M., and Quaresimin, M.: Analytical model for the prediction of the piezoresistive behavior of CNT modified polymers. Composites Part B 109, 53 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taherian, R.: Experimental and analytical model for the electrical conductivity of polymer-based nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 123, 17 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodosiou, T.C. and Saravanos, D.A.: Numerical investigation of mechanisms affecting the piezoresistive properties of CNT-doped polymers using multi-scale models. Compos. Sci. Technol. 70, 1312 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S., Rezvanian, O., Peters, K., and Zikry, M.: The viability and limitations of percolation theory in modeling the electrical behavior of carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Nanotechnology 24, 155706 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amini, A. and Bahreyni, B.: Behavioral model for electrical response and strain sensitivity of nanotube-based nanocomposite materials. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 30, 022001 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, N., Masuda, Z., Yan, C., Yamamoto, G., Fukunaga, H., and Hashida, T.: The electrical properties of polymer nanocomposites with carbon nanotube fillers. Nanotechnology 19, 215701 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, N., Karube, Y., Arai, M., Watanabe, T., Yan, C., Li, Y., Liu, Y., and Fukunaga, H.: Investigation on sensitivity of a polymer/carbon nanotube composite strain sensor. Carbon 48, 680 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, N., Karube, Y., Yan, C., Masuda, Z., and Fukunaga, H.: Tunneling effect in a polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposite strain sensor. Acta Mater. 56, 2929 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. and Ye, X.: A numerical investigation on piezoresistive behaviour of carbon nanotube/polymer composites: Mechanism and optimizing principle. Nanotechnology 24, 265704 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, R. and Servati, P.: Effects of inter-tube distance and alignment on tunnelling resistance and strain sensitivity of nanotube/polymer composite films. Nanotechnology 23, 055703 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y. and Weng, G.J.: Electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-and graphene-based nanocomposites. In Micromechanics and Nanomechanics of Composite Solids, Meguid, S.A. and Weng, G.J., eds., (Springer, Cham 2018); p. 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, S., Zhu, Z.H., and Meguid, S.A.: Carbon nanotube agglomeration effect on piezoresistivity of polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 55, 5488 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosetti, G., Grimaldi, C., Balberg, I., Maeder, T., Danani, A., and Ryser, P.: Solution of the tunneling-percolation problem in the nanocomposite regime. Phys. Rev. B 81, 155434 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Weng, G.J., Meguid, S.A., and Hamouda, A.M.: A continuum model with a percolation threshold and tunneling-assisted interfacial conductivity for carbon nanotube-based nanocomposites. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 193706 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J.G.: Generalized formula for the electric tunnel effect between similar electrodes separated by a thin insulating film. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1793 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Thostenson, E.T., and Chou, T-W.: Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 223114 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, R., Berry, M., Chan, T.F., Demmel, J., Donato, J., Dongarra, J., Eijkhout, V., Pozo, R., Romine, C., and Van der Vorst, H.: Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gbaguidi, A., Namilae, S., and Kim, D.: Monte Carlo model for piezoresistivity of hybrid nanocomposites. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 140, 011007 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taya, M., Kim, W., and Ono, K.: Piezoresistivity of a short fiber/elastomer matrix composite. Mech. Mater. 28, 53 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shokrieh, M.M. and Rafiee, R.: On the tensile behavior of an embedded carbon nanotube in polymer matrix with non-bonded interphase region. Compos. Struct. 92, 647 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhuiyan, M.A., Pucha, R.V., Worthy, J., Karevan, M., and Kalaitzidou, K.: Defining the lower and upper limit of the effective modulus of CNT/polypropylene composites through integration of modeling and experiments. Compos. Struct. 95, 80 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammadpour, E., Awang, M., Kakooei, S., and Akil, H.M.: Modeling the tensile stress–strain response of carbon nanotube/polypropylene nanocomposites using nonlinear representative volume element. Mater. Des. 58, 36 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, A., Martínez, M.T., Ansón-Casaos, A., Gómez-Pineda, L.E., Vaz, F., and Lanceros-Mendez, S.: Relationship between electromechanical response and percolation threshold in carbon nanotube/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composites. Carbon 61, 568 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L., Zhou, X., and Ding, Y.: Effective thermal and electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Chem. Phys. Lett. 434, 297 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagarkov, A. and Sarychev, A.: Electromagnetic properties of composites containing elongated conducting inclusions. Phys. Rev. B 53, 6318 (1996).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, L. and Li, Z.: Effective medium approximation for two-component nonlinear composites with shape distribution. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, 4397 (2003).Google Scholar
Hu, N., Fukunaga, H., Lu, C., Kameyama, M. and Yan, B.: Prediction of elastic properties of carbon nanotube reinforced composites. Proc. Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 461, 1685 (2005).Google Scholar