Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:26:43.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of calcium–magnesium–aluminum–silicon oxide mitigation in selected self-healing thermal barrier coating ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2020

Jingjing Gu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas76203, USA
Bowen Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas76203, USA
Alexander F. Berendt
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas76203, USA
Anindya Ghoshal
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command – Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland21005, USA
Michael Walock
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command – Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland21005, USA
Richard F. Reidy
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas76203, USA
Diana Berman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas76203, USA
Samir M. Aouadi*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas76203, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The mitigation of CMAS (calcium–magnesium–aluminum–silicon oxide) infiltration is a major requirement for the stability of thermal barrier coatings. In this study, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ)–Al2O3–SiC, YSZ–Al2O3–Ta2O5, and YSZ–Al2O3–Nb2O5 self-healing composites produced by uniaxially pressing powders were investigated as an alternative to YSZ. CMAS infiltration in these materials was tested at 1250 °C for 10 h. Comparing the depth of CMAS infiltration using scanning electron microscope (SEM) in tandem with electron-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), all self-healing materials were found to perform better than the reference materials. While standard YSZ shows massive CMAS infiltration, SEM micrographs and EDS maps revealed a 33-fold improvement in CMAS resistance for the YSZ–Al2O3–Nb2O5 system, which exhibited the best performance among the selected self-repairing materials. X-ray diffraction and high-resolution SEM micrographs taken 10 μm below the surface revealed that CMAS only infiltrated pores in the topmost region of the samples. Both YSZ–Al2O3–Ta2O5 and YSZ–Al2O3–Nb2O5 systems showed no signs of chemical reaction with CMAS.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

b)

Contributing Editor: Michael Walock.

References

Dhomme, S. and Mahalle, A.M.: Thermal barrier coating materials for SI engine. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8, 15321537 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B., Liu, Y., Zhu, C., Xiang, H., Chen, H., Gao, Y., and Zhou, Y.: Advances on strategies for searching for next generation thermal barrier coating materials. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 8, 833851 (2019).Google Scholar
Clarke, D.R. and Phillpot, S.R.: Thermal barrier coating materials. Mater. Today 8, 2229 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V. and Kandasubramanian, B.: Processing and design methodologies for advanced and novel thermal barrier coatings for engineering applications. Particuology 27, 128 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L., Wang, C.-A., Huang, Y., Sun, C., Lu, S., and Hu, Z.: Control of pore channel size during freeze casting of porous YSZ ceramics with unidirectionally aligned channels using different freezing temperatures. J. Eur. Cerm. Soc. 30, 33893396 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myoung, S.W., Lee, S.S., Kim, H.S., Kim, M.S., Jung, Y.G., and Jung, S.I.: Effect of post heat treatment on thermal durability of thermal barrier coatings in thermal fatigue tests. Surf. Coat. Technol. 215, 4651 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, C., Zhao, M., Shahid, M., Wang, M., and Pan, W.: Restrained TGO growth in YSZ/NiCrAlY thermal barrier coatings by modified laser remelting. Surf. Coat. Technol. 309, 11191125 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, M., Ndamka, N.L., Wellman, R.G., and Nicholls, J.R.: CMAS degradation of EB-PVD TBCs: The effect of basicity. Surf. Coat. Technol. 270, 145153 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, K.M., Krämer, S., Löfvander, J.P.A., and Levi, C.G.. CMAS degradation of environmental barrier coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 202, 653657 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, S., Yang, J., Levi, C.G., and Johnson, C.A.. Thermomechnical interaction of thermal barrier coatings with molten CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 (CMAS) deposits. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 31673175 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieto, A., Walock, M., Ghoshal, A., Zhu, D., Gamble, W., Barnett, B., Murugan, M., Pepi, M., Rowe, C., and Pegg, R.: Layered, composite, and doped thermal barrier coatings exposed to sand laden flows within a gas turbine engine: Microstructural evolution, mechanical properties, and CMAS deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 349, 11071116 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, A.K., Bhattacharya, R.S., Wolfe, D.E., and Eden, T.J.: CMAS-resistant thermal barrier coatings. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 7, 662674 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y.X., Bai, Y., Du, G.Q., Yu, F.L., Bao, C.G., Wang, Y.T., and Ding, F.: High temperature wettability between CMAS and YSZ coating with tailored surface microstructures. Mater. Lett. 229, 4043 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakkar, S., Pantawane, M.V., Gu, J.J., Ghoshal, A., Walock, M., Murugan, M., Young, M.L., Dahotre, N., Berman, D., and Aouadi, S.M.: Laser surface modification of porous yttria stabilized zirconia against CMAS degradation. Ceram. Int. 46, 60386045 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drexler, J.M., Gledhill, A.D., Shinoda, K., Vasiliev, A.I., Reddy, K.M., Sampath, S., and Padture, N.P.: Jet engine coatings for resisting volcanic ash damage. Adv. Mater. 23, 24192424 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narapaju, R., Pubbysetty, R.P., Mechnich, P., and Schulz, U.: EB-PVD alumina (Al2O3) as a top coat on 7YSZ TBCs against CMAS/VA infiltration: Deposition and reaction mechanisms. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 38, 33333346 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouyang, T., Xiong, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, D., Fang, X., Wang, Y., Feng, S., Zhou, T., and Suo, J.: Cyclic oxidation behavior of SiC-containing self-healing TBC systems fabricated by APS. J. Alloys Compd. 691, 811821 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, J.J., Joshi, S.S., Ho, Y.-S., Wei, B.W., Huang, T.Y., Lee, J., Berman, D., Dahotre, N.B., and Aouadi, S.M.: Oxidation-induced healing in laser-processed thermal barrier coatings. Thin Solid Films 688, 137481 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, A.M., Awaad, M., Bondioli, F., and Naga, S.M.: Densification behavior and mechanical properties of niobium-oxide-doped alumina ceramics. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 5, 5156 (2014).Google Scholar
Ouyang, T., Wu, J., Yasir, M., Zhou, T., Fang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, D., and Suo, J.: Effect of TiC self-healing coatings on the cyclic oxidation resistance and lifetime of thermal barrier coatings. J. Alloys Compd. 656, 9921003 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesner, V.L. and Bansal, N.P.: Mechanical and thermal properties of calcium-magnesium aluminosilicate (CMAS) glass. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35, 29072914 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naraparaju, R., Schulz, U., Mechnich, P., Döbber, P., and Seidel, F.: Degradation study of 7 wt.% yttria stabilised zirconia (7YSZ) thermal barrier coatings on aero-engine combustion chamber parts due to infiltration by different CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 variants. Surf. Coat. Technol. 260, 7381 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aouadi, S.M., Gu, J., and Berman, D.. Self-healing ceramic coatings that operate in extreme environments: a review. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 38, 050802 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pujol, G., Ansart, F., Bonino, J.-P., Malié, A., and Hamadi, S.: Step-by-step investigation of degradation mechanisms induced by CMAS attack on YSZ materials for TBC applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 237, 7178 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isuprova, E.N., Godina, N.A., and Keler, E.K.: Phase diagram for ceramists. Izu. Akad. Nauk SSSR Neorg. Mater. 6, 14651469 (1970).Google Scholar
Guo, L., Li, M., Yang, C., Zhang, C., Xu, L., Ye, F., Dan, C., and Ji, V.: Calcium-magnesium-alumina-silicate (CMAS) resistance property of BaLn2Ti3O10 (Ln = La, Nd) for thermal barrier coating applications. Ceram. Int. 43, 1052110527 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, B., Song, W., Wei, L., Xiu, Y., Xu, H., Dingwell, D.B., and Guo, H.: Novel thermal barrier coatings repel and resist molten silicate deposits. Scr. Mater. 163, 7176 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, D.E., Laquai, R., Müller, B., Helle, O., Sebold, D., Vaßen, R., and Bruno, G.: Evolution of porosity, crack density, and CMAS penetration in thermal barrier coatings subjected to burner rig. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 61636175 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Hu, M., and Feng, J.: Mechanical properties, thermal expansion performance and intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity of AlMO4 (M = Ta, Nb) ceramics for high-temperature applications. Ceram. Int. 45, 66166623 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osada, T., Kamoda, K., Mitome, M., Hara, T., Abel, T., Tamagawa, Y., Nakao, W., and Ohmura, T.: A novel design approach for self-crack-healing structural ceramics with 3D networks of healing activator. Sci. Rep. 7, 17853 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirani, A., Gu, J., Wei, B., Lee, J., Aouadi, S.M., and Berman, D.: Tribologically enhanced self-healing of niobium oxide surfaces. Surf. Coat. Technol. 364, 273278 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, J.J., Steiner, D., Mogonye, J.E., and Aouadi, S.M.: Precipitation-induced healing of Nb2O5. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 13, 41414146 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar