Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:22:26.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biomimetic study of a polymeric composite material for joint repair applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Rahul Ribeiro ,
Poulomi Ganguly ,
Donald Darensbourg ,
Meitin Usta ,
A. Hikmet Ucisik  and
Hong Liang
Rahul Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Poulomi Ganguly
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842-3012
Donald Darensbourg
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77842-3012
Meitin Usta
Affiliation:
Gebze Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 41400 Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
A. Hikmet Ucisik
Affiliation:
Bogazici University, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Prostheses, Materials and Artificial Organs, 80815 Bebek/Istanbul, Turkey
Hong Liang*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A longer lifespan is still being sought for biomaterials used for joint repair. We developed a new nanocomposite material of polytrimethylene carbonate (PTMC), hydroxyapatite (HAP), and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNT) to mimic real cartilage. Experimental results were compared with those of natural cartilage and the conventional joint replacement material ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Friction experiments showed that our developed composite material had a coefficient of friction close to that of articular cartilage. Nanoindentation experiments indicated that the surface elastic behavior was similar to that of cartilage. The surface attraction forces on a silicon atomic force microscope tip were much higher for cartilage than those for the other two materials. These results hold promise for this artificial cartilage composite material’s performance in vivo, following further experimental investigations and chemical modifications.

Keywords

BiomedicalLubricantPolymerization
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 22 , Issue 6 , June 2007 , pp. 1632 - 1639
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Bhat, S.V.: Biomaterials,(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002)Google Scholar
2Risbud, M.V.Sittinger, M.: Tissue engineering: Advances in in vitro cartilage generation. Trends Biotechnol. 20(8), 351 2002Google Scholar
3Harris, W.H.: Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis: The problem. Clin. Orthop. 393, 66 2001Google Scholar
4Ingham, E.Fisher, J.: The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials 26, 1271 2005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Dowson, D.: Progress in tribology: A historical perspective, in Proceedings of the First World Tribology Congress on New Directions in Tribology,London, edited by I. M. Hutchings (1997), 320Google Scholar
6Lewis, G.: Polyethylene wear in total hip and knee arthroplasties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 38(1), 55 19973.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Sargeant, A.Goswami, T.: Hip implants: Paper V. Physiological effects. Mater. Design 27, 287 2006Google Scholar
8Howling, G.I., Barnett, P.I., Tipper, J.L., Stone, M.H., Fisher, J.Ingham, E.: Quantitative characterization of polyethylene debris isolated from periprosthetic tissue in early failure knee implants and early and late failure Charnley hip implants. Biomed. Mater. Res. 58, 415 2001Google Scholar
9Budford, A.Goswami, T.: Review of wear mechanisms in hip implants: Paper I–General. Mater. Des. 25, 385 2004Google Scholar
10Howse, J.: Semi-captive cups for hip replacement, in Joint Replacement,edited by Richard Coombs, Anthony Gristina, and David Hungerford, Orthotext, London (1990), 135Google Scholar
11Dumbleton, J.H.: Tribology of Natural and Artificial Joints Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company New York 1981Google Scholar
12Mow, V.C., Ratcliffe, A.Poole, A.R.: Cartilage and diarthrodial joints as paradigms for hierachical materials and structures. Biomaterials 13, 67 1992Google Scholar
13Martin, R.B., Burr, D.B.Sharkey, N.A.: Skeletal Tissue Mechanics Springer New York 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Katti, K.S.: Biomaterials in total joint replacement. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 39, 133 2004Google Scholar
15Archibeck, M.J., Jacobs, J.J., Rowbuck, K.A.Glant, T.T.: The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis. J. Bone J. Surg. 82A, 1478 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Berger, R.A., Jacobs, J.J., Quigley, L.R., Rosenberg, A.G.Galante, J.O.: Primary cementless acetabular reconstruction in patients younger than 50 years old. 7- to 11-year results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 344, 216 1997Google Scholar
17Devane, P.A., Bourne, R.B., Rorabeck, C.H., Hardie, R.M.Horne, J.G.: Measurement of polyethylene wear in metal-backed cups I. Three dimensional technique. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 319, 317 1995Google Scholar
18Yasuda, K., Gong, J.P., Katsuyama, Y., Nakayama, A., Tanabe, Y., Kondo, E., Ueno, M.Osada, Y.: Biomechanical properties of high-toughness double network hydrogels. Biomaterials 26, 4468 2005Google Scholar
19Oka, M., Ushio, K., Kumar, P., Hyon, S.H., Nakamura, T.Fujita, H.: Development of artificial articular cartilage. Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs 214(H), 59 2000Google Scholar
20Covert, R.J., Ott, R.D.Ku, D.N.: Friction characteristics of a potential articular cartilage biomaterial. Wear 255, 1064 2003Google Scholar
21Freeman, M.A., Furey, M.J., Love, B.J.Hampton, J.M.: Friction, wear and lubrication of hydrogels as synthetic articular cartilage. Wear 241, 129 2000Google Scholar
22Święszkowski, W., Ku, D.N., Bersee, H.E.N.Kurzydlowski, K.J.: An elastic material for cartilage replacement in an arthritic shoulder joint. Biomaterials 27, 1534 2006Google Scholar
23Raghunath, J., Salacinski, H.J., Sales, K.M., Butler, P.E.Seifalian, A.M.: Advancing cartilage tissue engineering: The application of stem cell technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 503 2005Google Scholar
24Swann, D.A., Radin, E.L.Hendren, R.B.: The lubrication of articular cartilage by synovial fluid glycoproteins. Arthritis Rheum. 22, 665 1979Google Scholar
25Swann, D.A., Silver, F.H., Slayter, H.S., Stafford, W.Showe, E.: The molecular structure and lubricating activity of lubricin from bovine and human synovial fluids. Biochem. J. 225, 195 1985Google Scholar
26Heuberger, M.P., Widmer, M.R., Zobeley, E., Glockshuber, R.Spencer, N.D.: Protein-mediated boundary lubrication in arthroplasty. Biomaterials 26, 1165 2005Google Scholar
27I-Riley, S.L., Okun, L.E., Prado, G., Applegate, M.A.Ratcliffe, A.: Human articular chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation on synthetic biodegradable polymer films. Biomaterials 20, 2245 1999Google Scholar
28Kose, G.T., Korkusuz, F., Ozkul, A., Soysal, Y., Ozdemir, T., Yildiz, C.Hasirci, V.: Tissue engineered cartilage on collagen and PHBV matrices. Biomaterials 26, 5187 2005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Yamane, S., Iwasaki, N., Majima, T., Funakoshi, T., Masuko, T., Harada, K., Mihami, A., Monde, K.Nishimura, S-I.: Feasibility of chitosan-based hyaluronic acid hybric biomaterial for a novel scaffold in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26, 611 2005Google Scholar
30Cyster, L.A., Grant, D.M., Howdle, S.M., Rose, F.R.A.J., Irvine, D.J., Freeman, D., Scotchford, C.A.Shakesheff, K.M.: The influence of dispersant concentration on the pore morphology of hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26, 697 2005Google Scholar
31Ducheyne, P.Qiu, Q.: Bioactive ceramics: The effect of surface reactivity on bone formation and bone cell function. Biomaterials 20, 2287 1999Google Scholar
32Klein, C., Driessen, A.A., Degroot, K.Vandenhooff, A.: Biodegradation behavior of various calcium-phosphate materials in bone tissue. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 17, 769 1983CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Katz, A.R., Mukherjee, D.P., Kaganov, A.L.Gordon, S.: A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 161, 213 1985Google ScholarPubMed
34Jain, R.A.: The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices. Biomaterials 21, 2475 2000CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Edwards, R.C., Kiely, K.D.Eppley, B.L.: The fate of resorbable poly-L-lactic/polyglycolic acid (Lactosorb) bone fixation devices in orthognathic surgery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 59(1), 19 2001Google Scholar
36Seal, B.L., Otero, T.C.Panitch, A.: Review of polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration. Mater. Sci. Eng.,R 34, 147 2001Google Scholar
37Smart, S.K., Cassady, A.I., Lu, G.Q.Martin, D.J.: The biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 44, 1034 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Cenni, E., Granchi, D., Arciola, C.R., Ciapetti, G., Savarino, L.Stea, S.: Adhesive protein expression on endothelial cells after contact in vitro with polyethylene terephthalate coated with pyrolitic carbon. Biomaterials 16, 1223 1995Google Scholar
39Ma, L.Sines, G.: Fatigue behavior of a pyrolitic carbon. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51A(1), 61 20003.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Haubold, A.D.: Blood/carbon interactions. ASAIO J. 6, 88 1983Google Scholar
41Blitterswijk, C.A.V., Grote, J.J., Kuijpers, W., Daems, W.T.de Groot, K.A.: Macropore tissue ingrowth: A quantitative and qualitative study on hydroxyapatite ceramic. Biomaterials 7, 137 1986Google Scholar
42Furuzono, T., Wang, P-L., Korematsu, A., Miyazaki, K., O-Mori, M., Kowashi, Y., Ohura, K., Tanaka, J.Kishida, A.: Physical and biological evaluations of sintered hydroxyapatite/silicone composite with covalent bonding for a percutaneous implant material. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B: Appl. Biomater. 65, 217 2003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Fabre, T., Schappacher, M., Bareille, R., Dupuy, B., Soum, A., Bertrand-Barat, J.Baquey, C.: Study of a (trimethylene-co-e-caprolactone) polymer-Part 2: In vitro cytocompatibility analysis and in vivo ED1 cell response of a new nerve guide. Biomaterials 22, 2951 2001Google Scholar
44Zhang, Z., Kuijer, R., Bulstra, S.K., Grijpma, D.W.Feijen, J.: The in vivo and in vitro degradation behavior of poly (trimethylene carbonate). Biomaterials 27, 1741 2006Google Scholar
45Darensbourg, D.J., Ganguly, P.Billodeaux, D.R.: Ring opening polymerization of Trimethylene carbonate using aluminum (III) and Tin (IV) salen chloride catalysts. Macromolecules 38, 5406 2005Google Scholar
46Collins, D.H.Meachim, G.: Sulphate (35SO4) fixation by human articular cartilage compared in the knee and shoulder joints. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 20, 117 1961Google Scholar
47Shi, X.F.Apatite coating over zirconium metal by a biomimetic method, M.S. Thesis, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN (2002)Google Scholar
48Kokubo, T., Kushitani, H.Sakka, S.: Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 24, 721 1990Google Scholar