Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T17:38:19.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioinspired micro-composite structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

L. Chen ,
R. Ballarini ,
H. Kahn  and
A.H. Heuer
L. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7201
R. Ballarini*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7201
H. Kahn
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
A.H. Heuer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. Present address: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents the design, fabrication, and mechanical testing of a bioinspired composite structure with characteristic dimensions on the order of tens of microns. The microarchitecture, designed and fabricated using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology, involves two distinct length scales and represents the first attempt at mimicking the crossed-lamellar microstructure of molluscan shells such as the giant Queen conch, Strombus gigas, which contains features with dimensions spanning five distinct length scales. The displacement control capabilities of a nanoindenter enabled the observation of the graceful failure of the micro-composite under three point bending and, in turn, the measurement of its post-peak load–displacement response and work of fracture.

Keywords

BiomimeticMicrostructureMicroelectro-mechanical (MEMS)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 124 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Currey, J.D. and Taylor, J.D.: The mechanical behavior of some molluscan hard tissues. J. Zool. 173, 395 (1974).Google Scholar
2Kuhn-Spearing, L.T., Kessler, H., Chateau, E., Ballarini, R., and Heuer, A.H.: Fracture mechanisms of the Strombus gigas conch shell: Implications for the design of brittle laminates. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 6583 (1996).Google Scholar
3Kamat, S., Su, X., Ballarini, R., and Heuer, A.H.: Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas. Nature 405, 1036 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Bøggild, O.B.: The shell structure of the molluscs. K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr. 2, 232 (1930).Google Scholar
5Gregoire, C.: Structure of molluscan shell, in Chemical Zoology, edited by Florkin, M. and Scheer, B.T. (Academic Press, New York, 1972), p. 45.Google Scholar
6Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., and Turner, R.M.: The mechanical design of nacre. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 234, 415 (1988).Google Scholar
7Laraia, V.J. and Heuer, A.H.: Novel composite microstructure and mechanical-behavior of mollusc shell. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 2177 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., and Turner, R.M.: Comparison of nacre with other ceramic composites. J. Mater. Sci. 25, 3173 (1990).Google Scholar
9Kessler, H., Ballarini, R., Mullen, R.L., Kuhn, L.T., and Heuer, A.H.: A biomimetic example of brittle toughening: (I) Steady state multiple cracking. Comp. Mater. Sci. 5, 157 (1996).Google Scholar
10Kamat, S., Kessler, H., Ballarini, R., Nassirou, M., and Heuer, A.H.: Fracture mechanisms of the Strombus gigas conch shell—(II) Micromechanics analyses of multiple cracking and large-scale crack bridging. Acta Mater. 52, 2395 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Aveston, J., Cooper, G.A., and Kelly, A.: Properties of fiber composites, in Conf. Proc. 15 (National Physical Laboratory, IPC Science and Technology Press, Guilford, Surrey, UK, 1971).Google Scholar
12Proteins Elastomeric Structures, Biomechanical Properties, and Biological Roles, edited by Shewry, P.R., Tatham, A.S. and Bailey, A.J. (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
13Smith, B.L., Schäffer, T.E., Viani, M., Thompson, J.B., Frederick, N.A., Kindt, J., Belcher, A., Stuckey, G.D., Morse, D.E., and Hansma, P.K.: Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites. Nature 399, 761 (1999).Google Scholar
14Cölfen, H. and Mann, S.: Higher-order organization by mesoscale self-assembly and transformation of hybrid nanostructures. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 42, 2350 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15O’Kelly, J., Crockett, R., Martin, H., and Calvert, P.: Biomimetic processing of gel glasses and organic-inorganic hybrids. J. Sol.-Gel Sci. Technol. 8, 641 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Li, C. and Kaplan, D.L.: Biomimetic composites via molecular scale self-assembly and biomineralization. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 7, 265 (2003).Google Scholar
17Tang, Z., Kotov, N.A., Magonov, S., and Ozturk, B.: Nanostructured artificial nacre. Nat. Mater. 2, 413 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Mayer, G.: Rigid biological systems as models for synthetic composites. Science 310, 1144 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Chen, L.: A bioinspired micro-composite structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (2005).Google Scholar