Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:36:35.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anisotropic elastic properties of nanocrystalline nickel thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

D.C. Hurley*
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
R.H. Geiss
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
M. Kopycinska-Müller
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
J. Müller
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
D.T. Read
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
J.E. Wright
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Boulder, Colorado 80305
N.M. Jennett
Affiliation:
Materials Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
A.S. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Materials Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The elastic properties of a nickel film approximately 800 nm thick were measured with nanoindentation, microtensile testing, atomic force acoustic microscopy (AFAM), and surface acoustic wave (SAW) spectroscopy. Values for the indentation modulus (220–223 GPa) and Young’s modulus (177–204 GPa) were lower than predicted for randomly oriented polycrystalline nickel. The observed behavior was attributed to grain-boundary effects in the nanocrystalline film. In addition, the different measurement results were not self-consistent when interpreted assuming elastic isotropy. Agreement was improved by adopting a transversely isotropic model corresponding to the film’s 〈111〉 preferred orientation and reducing the elastic moduli by 10–15%. The SAW spectroscopy results indicated that the film density was 1–2% lower than expected for bulk nickel, consistent with models for nanocrystalline materials. Similar reductions in modulus and density were observed for two additional films approximately 200 and 50 nm thick using AFAM and SAW spectroscopy. These results illustrate how complementary methods can provide a more complete picture of film properties.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Brotzen, F.R.: Mechanical testing of thin films. Int. Mater. Rev. 39, 24 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kraft, O. and Volkert, C.A.: Mechanical testing of thin films and small structures. Adv. Eng. Mater. 3, 99 (2001).3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Every, A.G.: Measurement of the near-surface elastic properties of solids and thin supported films. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, R21 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Badawi, K.F., Villain, P., Goudeau, Ph. and Renault, P-O.: Measuring thin film and multilayer elastic constants by coupling in situ tensile testing with x-ray diffraction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4705 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jennett, N.M., Aldrich-Smith, G. and Maxwell, A.S.: Validated measurement of Young’s modulus, Poisson ratio and thickness for thin coatings by combining instrumented nanoindentation and acoustical measurements. J. Mater. Res. 19, 143 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Buchheit, T.E., LaVan, D.A., Michael, J.R., Christenson, T.R. and Leith, S.D.: Microstructural and mechanical properties investigation of electrodeposited and annealed LIGA nickel structures. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33A, 539 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Robertson, A., Erb, U. and Palumbo, G.: Practical applications for electrodeposited nanocrystalline materials. Nanostruct. Mater. 12, 1035 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Choi, Y. and Suresh, S.: Size effects on the mechanical properties of thin polycrystalline metal films on substrates. Acta Mater. 50, 1881 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Read, D.T., Cheng, Y-W., Keller, R.R. and McColskey, J.D.: Tensile properties of free-standing aluminum thin films. Scripta Mater. 45, 583 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.ISO, BS EN 14577:2002 parts 1–3, Metallic Materials—Instrumented Indentation Test for Hardness and Materials Parameters (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland).Google Scholar
11.Herrmann, K., Jennett, N.M., Wegener, W., Meneve, J., Hasche, K. and Seemann, R.: Progress in determination of the area function of indenters used for nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 377–378, 394 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Rabe, U., Amelio, S., Kopycinska, M., Hirsekorn, S., Kempf, M., Göcken, M. and Arnold, W.: Imaging and measurement of local mechanical material properties by atomic force acoustic microscopy. Surf. Interface Anal. 33, 65 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hurley, D.C., Shen, K., Jennett, N.M. and Turner, J.: Atomic force acoustic microscopy methods to determine thin-film elastic properties. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 2347 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Simmons, G. and Wang, H.: Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties: A Handbook, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971), pp. 5658.Google Scholar
15.Schneider, D., Schwarz, T. and Schultrich, B.: Determination of elastic modulus and thickness of surface layers by ultrasonic surface waves. Thin Solid Films 219, 92 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hurley, D.C., Tewary, V.K. and Richards, A.J.: Surface acoustic wave methods to determine the anisotropic elastic properties of thin films. Meas. Sci. Technol. 12, 1486 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Tewary, V.K.: Theory of elastic wave propagation in anisotropic film on anisotropic substrate: TiN film on single-crystal Si. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 925 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Huang, H. and Spaepen, F.: Tensile testing of free-standing Cu, Ag, and Al thin films and Ag/Cu multilayers. Acta Mater. 48, 3261 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Stauss, S., Schwaller, P., Bucaille, J-L., Rabe, R., Rohr, L., Michler, J. and Blank, E.: Determining the stress-strain behaviour of small devices by nanoindentation in combination with inverse methods. Microelectron. Eng. 67–8, 818 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.report, European: INDICOAT SMT-CT98-2249, NPL Report MATC (A) 24 (National Physical Laboratory, Middlesex, U.K., 2001).Google Scholar
21.Spary, I., Jennett, N.M. and Bushby, A.J.: Indentation and finite element modeling investigations of the indentation size effect in aluminum coatings on borosilicate glass substrates, in Thin Films—Stresses and Mechanical Properties X, edited by Corcoran, S.G., Joo, Y-C., Moody, N.R., and Suo, Z. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 795, Warrendale, PA, 2004), p. 455.Google Scholar
22.Grimvall, G.: Thermophysical Properties of Materials (Elsevier, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
23.Sanders, P., Youngdahl, C.P. and Weertman, J.R.: The strength of nanocrystalline metals with and without flaws. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 234–236, 77 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Palumbo, G., Thorpe, S.J. and Aust, K.T.: On the contribution of triple junctions to the structure and properties of nanocrystalline materials. Scripta Metall. Mater. 24, 1347 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Wang, G-F., Feng, X-Q., Yu, S-W. and Nan, C-W.: Interface effects on effective elastic moduli of nanocrystalline materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 363, 1 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Anastassakis, E. and Siakavellas, M.: Elastic properties of textured diamond and silicon. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 144 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Vlassak, J.J. and Nix, W.D.: Indentation modulus of elastically anisotropic half spaces. Philos. Mag. A 67, 1045 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Gladwell, G.M.L.: Contact Problems in the Classical Theory of Elasticity (Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Germantown, MD, 1980), p. 581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar