Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:48:24.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anelastic recovery of pure magnesium quantitatively evaluated by acoustic emission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Yunping Li*
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi-ken 980-8577, Japan
Manabu Enoki
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Anelastic recovery of pure magnesium was monitored quantitatively by means of acoustic emission (AE) in cyclic compression–quick unloading–recovery process. The influences of grain size, strain rate, and the strain-controlled cyclic process on anelastic recovery were analyzed in details. A detwinning model in anelastic recovery process was proposed, and the results showed good agreement with the experimental data. Three stages of anelastic recovery behavior as a function of strain were observed: stages I and III were considered to be dominated by various detwinning processes and stage II was dominated by thermal motion of dislocation. A quantitative relationship between anelastic recovery strain and AE signals was obtained, and from which the anelastic recovery strains from dislocation motion and detwinning were separated for the first time. In the strain-controlled cyclic process, both the amount of AE signals and the anelastic recovery strain were observed to decrease while the fraction of anelastic recovery strain from dislocation motions was observed to decrease more rapidly than that from detwinning with increasing cyclic number.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Rajagopalan, J., Han, J.H., and Saif, M.T.A.: Plastic deformation recovery in freestanding nanocrystalline aluminum and gold thin films. Science 315, 1831 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Jones, E.R.W. and Munro, W.: The “elastic hysteresis” of uranium. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1, 182 (1953).Google Scholar
3.Goo, E., Duerig, T.W., Melton, K., and Sinclair, R.: Mechanical twinning in Ti50Ni47Fe3 and Ti49Ni51 alloys. Acta Metall. 33, 1725 (1984).Google Scholar
4.Caceres, C.H., Sumitomo, T., and Veidt, M.: Pseudoelastic behaviour of cast magnesium AZ91 alloy under cyclic loading–unloading. Acta Mater. 51, 6211 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Mann, G.E., Sumitomo, T., Caceres, C.H., and Griffiths, J.R.: Reversible plastic strain during cyclic loading–unloading of Mg and Mg–Zn alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 456, 138 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Duerig, T.W. and Zadno, R.: Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys, 1st ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Essex, 1990), p. 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Miller, R.K. and Mclntire, P. (eds.): Nondestructive Testing Handbook, 2nd ed. (AE Testing, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH, 1987), p. 254.Google Scholar
8.Li, Y.P. and Enoki, M.: Evaluation of the twinning behavior of polycrystalline magnesium at room temperature by acoustic emission. Mater. Trans. 48, 1215 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Li, Y.P. and Enoki, M.: Deformation and anelastic recovery of pure magnesium and AZ31B alloy investigated by AE. Mater. Trans. 48, 2343 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Barnett, M.R., Keshavarz, Z., Beer, A.G., and Atwell, D.: Influence of grain size on the compressive deformation of wrought Mg–3Al–1Zn. Acta Mater. 52, 5093 (2004).Google Scholar
11.Gil, F.J. and Guilemany, J.M.: The determination of the influence of heat treatment on the martensitic transformation in Cu-Zn-Al-Mn shape-memory alloy by calorimetry and acoustic emission techniques. Thermochim. Acta 205, 75 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Li, Y.P. and Enoki, M.: Recovery behaviour of pure magnesium in cyclic compression–quick unloading-recovery process at room temperature investigated by AE. Mater. Trans. 49, 1800 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Callister, W.D. Jr.: Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 4th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1996), p. 87.Google Scholar
14.Reed-Hill, R.E., Hirth, J.P., and Rogers, H.C.: Deformation twinning, in Proceedings of Metallurgical Society Conference, Gainesville, Vol. 25, March 21–22, 1963, p. 1.Google Scholar
15.Christian, J.W. and Mahajan, S.: Deformation twinning. Prog. Mater. Sci. 39, 1 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Koike, J., Kobayashi, T., Mukai, T., Watanabe, H., Suzuki, M., Maruyama, K., and Higashi, K.: The activity of non-basal slip systems and dynamic recovery at room temperature in fine-grained AZ31B magnesium alloys. Acta Mater. 51, 2055 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar