Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:10:23.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suspension- and solution-based freeze casting for porous ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2017

Maninpat Naviroj ,
Peter W. Voorhees  and
Katherine T. Faber
Maninpat Naviroj
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
Peter W. Voorhees
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
Katherine T. Faber*
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Freeze casting of traditional ceramic suspensions and freeze casting of preceramic polymer solutions were directly compared as methods for processing porous ceramics. Alumina and polymethylsiloxane were freeze cast with four different organic solvents (cyclooctane, cyclohexane, dioxane, and dimethyl carbonate) to obtain ceramics with ∼70% porosity. Median pore sizes were smaller for solution freeze casting than for suspension freeze casting under identical processing conditions. The pore structures, which range from foam-like to lamellar, were correlated to the Jackson α-factor of the solvent; solvents with low α-factors yielded nonfaceted pore structures, while high α-factors produced more faceted structures. Intermediate α-factors resulted in dendritic pore structures and were most sensitive to the processing method. Small suspended particles ahead of a solid–liquid interface are hypothesized to destabilize the dendrite tip in suspension freeze casting resulting in more foam-like structures. Differences in processing details were highlighted, particularly regarding the improved freezing front observation possible with solution-based freeze casting.

Keywords

ceramicporositydirectional solidification
Type
Invited Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 17: Focus Issue: Achieving Superior Ceramics and Coating Properties through Innovative Processing , 14 September 2017 , pp. 3372 - 3382
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Nahum Travitzky

References

REFERENCES

Messing, G.L. and Stevenson, A.J.: Toward pore-free ceramics. Science 322(5900), 383 (2008).Google Scholar
Colombo, P.: In praise of pores. Science 322(5900), 381 (2008).Google Scholar
Haberman, B.A. and Young, J.B.: Three-dimensional simulation of chemically reacting gas flows in the porous support structure of an integrated-planar solid oxide fuel cell. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47(17–18), 3617 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodard, J.R., Hilldore, A.J., Lan, S.K., Park, C.J., Morgan, A.W., Eurell, J.A.C., Clark, S.G., Wheeler, M.B., Jamison, R.D., and Wagoner Johnson, A.J.: The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials 28(1), 45 (2007).Google Scholar
Heidenreich, S.: Hot gas filtration—a review. Fuel 104, 83 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, K., Isobe, T., Katsumata, K., Kameshima, Y., Nakajima, A., and MacKenzie, K.J.D.: Porous ceramics mimicking nature—preparation and properties of microstructures with unidirectionally oriented pores. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 12(6), 64701 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohji, T. and Fukushima, M.: Macro-porous ceramics: Processing and properties. Int. Mater. Rev. 57(2), 115 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammel, E.C., Ighodaro, O.L-R., and Okoli, O.I.: Processing and properties of advanced porous ceramics: An application based review. Ceram. Int. 40(10, Part A), 15351 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studart, A.R., Gonzenbach, U.T., Tervoort, E., and Gauckler, L.J.: Processing routes to macroporous ceramics: A review. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89(6), 1771 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araki, K. and Halloran, J.W.: Porous ceramic bodies with interconnected pore channels by a novel freeze casting technique. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88(5), 1108 (2005).Google Scholar
Deville, S.: Freeze-casting of porous ceramics: A review of current achievements and issues. Adv. Eng. Mater. 10(3), 155 (2008).Google Scholar
Li, W.L., Lu, K., and Walz, J.Y.: Freeze casting of porous materials: Review of critical factors in microstructure evolution. Int. Mater. Rev. 57(1), 37 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunger, P.M., Donius, A.E., and Wegst, U.G.K.: Structure–property-processing correlations in freeze-cast composite scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 9(5), 6338 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naviroj, M., Miller, S.M., Colombo, P., and Faber, K.T.: Directionally aligned macroporous SiOC via freeze casting of preceramic polymers. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35(8), 2225 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seuba, J., Deville, S., Guizard, C., and Stevenson, A.J.: Gas permeability of ice-templated, unidirectional porous ceramics. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 179(1), 1 (2016).Google Scholar
Deville, S., Saiz, E., and Tomsia, A.P.: Ice-templated porous alumina structures. Acta Mater. 55(6), 1965 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waschkies, T., Oberacker, R., and Hoffmann, M.J.: Investigation of structure formation during freeze-casting from very slow to very fast solidification velocities. Acta Mater. 59(13), 5135 (2011).Google Scholar
Ghosh, D., Banda, M., Kang, H., and Dhavale, N.: Platelets-induced stiffening and strengthening of ice-templated highly porous alumina scaffolds. Scr. Mater. 125, 29 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullins, W.W. and Sekerka, R.F.: Stability of a planar interface during solidification of a dilute binary alloy. J. Appl. Phys. 35(2), 444 (1964).Google Scholar
Miller, S.M., Xiao, X., and Faber, K.T.: Freeze-cast alumina pore networks: Effects of freezing conditions and dispersion medium. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35(13), 3595 (2015).Google Scholar
Chen, R., Wang, C., Huang, Y., Ma, L., and Lin, W.: Ceramics with special porous structures fabricated by freeze-gelcasting: Using tert-butyl alcohol as a template. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90(11), 3478 (2007).Google Scholar
Han, J., Hong, C., Zhang, X., Du, J., and Zhang, W.: Highly porous ZrO2 ceramics fabricated by a camphene-based freeze-casting route: Microstructure and properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 30(1), 53 (2010).Google Scholar
Chino, Y. and Dunand, D.C.: Directionally freeze-cast titanium foam with aligned, elongated pores. Acta Mater. 56(1), 105 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greil, P.: Polymer derived engineering ceramics. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2(6), 339 (2000).Google Scholar
Riedel, R., Mera, G., Hauser, R., and Klonczynski, A.: Silicon-based polymer-derived ceramics: Synthesis properties and applications-a review. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 114(1330), 425 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, P., Mera, G., Riedel, R., and Sorarù, G.D.: Polymer-derived ceramics: 40 Years of research and innovation in advanced ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93(7), 1805 (2010).Google Scholar
Ionescu, E., Kleebe, H-J., and Riedel, R.: Silicon-containing polymer-derived ceramic nanocomposites (PDC-NCs): Preparative approaches and properties. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41(15), 5032 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, A., Roso, M., Modesti, M., Liu, J., and Colombo, P.: Preceramic polymer-derived SiOC fibers by electrospinning. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131(3), 39836 (2014).Google Scholar
Yoon, B-H., Lee, E-J., Kim, H-E., and Koh, Y-H.: Highly aligned porous silicon carbide ceramics by freezing polycarbosilane/camphene solution. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90(6), 1753 (2007).Google Scholar
Naviroj, M., Wang, M.M., Johnson, M.T., and Faber, K.T.: Nucleation-controlled freeze casting of preceramic polymers for uniaxial pores in Si-based ceramics. Scr. Mater. 130, 32 (2017).Google Scholar
Zhang, H., D’Angelo Nunes, P., Wilhelm, M., and Rezwan, K.: Hierarchically ordered micro/meso/macroporous polymer-derived ceramic monoliths fabricated by freeze-casting. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 36(1), 51 (2016).Google Scholar
Jackson, K.A., Uhlmann, D.R., and Hunt, J.D.: On the nature of crystal growth from the melt. J. Cryst. Growth 1(1), 1 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennema, P.: Morphology of crystals determined by alpha factors, roughening temperature, F faces and connected nets. J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 26(8B), B1 (1993).Google Scholar
Jackson, K.A.: Constitutional supercooling surface roughening. J. Cryst. Growth 264(4), 519 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nastac, L.: Numerical modeling of solidification morphologies and segregation patterns in cast dendritic alloys. Acta Mater. 47(17), 4253 (1999).Google Scholar
Liu, X-Y. and Bennema, P.: Theoretical consideration of the growth morphology of crystals. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 53(5), 2314 (1996).Google Scholar
Haxhimali, T., Karma, A., Gonzales, F., and Rappaz, M.: Orientation selection in dendritic evolution. Nat. Mater. 5(8), 660 (2006).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, R.: Modeling and numerical simulations of dendritic crystal growth. Phys. Nonlinear Phenom. 63(3), 410 (1993).Google Scholar
Brener, E., Müller-Krumbhaar, H., and Temkin, D.: Structure formation and the morphology diagram of possible structures in two-dimensional diffusional growth. Phys. Rev. E 54(3), 2714 (1996).Google Scholar
Glicksman, M.E.: Principles of Solidification. [Electronic Resource]: An Introduction to Modern Casting and Crystal Growth Concepts (Springer New York: Imprint: Springer, New York, NY, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallick, K.K. and Winnett, J.: Preparation and characterization of porous Bioglass® and PLLA scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95(9), 2680 (2012).Google Scholar
Lichtner, A.Z., Jauffrès, D., Roussel, D., Charlot, F., Martin, C.L., and Bordia, R.K.: Dispersion, connectivity and tortuosity of hierarchical porosity composite SOFC cathodes prepared by freeze-casting. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35(2), 585 (2015).Google Scholar
Xing, Z., Zhou, W., Du, F., Qu, Y., Tian, G., Pan, K., Tian, C., and Fu, H.: A floating macro/mesoporous crystalline anatase TiO2 ceramic with enhanced photocatalytic performance for recalcitrant wastewater degradation. Dalton Trans. 43(2), 790 (2013).Google Scholar
Szepes, A., Ulrich, J., Farkas, Z., Kovács, J., and Szabó-Révész, P.: Freeze-casting technique in the development of solid drug delivery systems. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 46(3), 230 (2007).Google Scholar
Bernardo, E., Colombo, P., Cacciotti, I., Bianco, A., Bedini, R., Pecci, R., Pardun, K., Treccani, L., and Rezwan, K.: Porous wollastonite–hydroxyapatite bioceramics from a preceramic polymer and micro- or nano-sized fillers. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32(2), 399 (2012).Google Scholar
Graczyk-Zajac, M., Toma, L., Fasel, C., and Riedel, R.: Carbon-rich SiOC anodes for lithium-ion batteries: Part I. Influence of material UV-pre-treatment on high power properties. Solid State Ionics 225, 522 (2012).Google Scholar
Konegger, T., Williams, L.F., and Bordia, R.K.: Planar, polysilazane-derived porous ceramic supports for membrane and catalysis applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 98(10), 3047 (2015).Google Scholar