Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T17:36:47.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spherical indentation method for estimating equibiaxial residual stress and elastic–plastic properties of metals simultaneously

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2018

Guangjian Peng ,
Zhike Lu ,
Yi Ma ,
Yihui Feng ,
Yong Huan  and
Taihua Zhang
Guangjian Peng
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
Zhike Lu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics (LNM), Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Yi Ma
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
Yihui Feng
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics (LNM), Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Yong Huan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics (LNM), Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Taihua Zhang*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

For instrumented spherical indentation, the presence of equibiaxial residual stress in a material will lead the indentation load–depth curve to shift upward or downward. The load differences between the stressed and stress-free curves were used to estimate the equibiaxial residual stress. Using dimensional analysis and finite element simulations, the equibiaxial residual stress was related to the elastic–plastic parameters and the relative load difference at a fixed normalized indentation depth (h/R = 0.1). Based on these expressions, and together with the method for determining elastic–plastic parameters established in our previous work, an integrated method was proposed to estimate the equibiaxial residual stress and elastic–plastic parameters of metals simultaneously via instrumented spherical indentation. This method avoids preknowledge of the yield strength and measuring the contact area. Applications were illustrated on Al 2024, Al 7075, and Ti Grade 5 with introduced stresses. By comparing the results determined by this integrated method with the reference values, the maximum relative error is generally within ±10% for the yield strength, within ±15% for the elastic modulus, and within ±20% for the equibiaxial residual stress.

Keywords

nanoindentationmetalsimulation
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 33 , Issue 8 , 27 April 2018 , pp. 884 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Yang-T. Cheng

References

REFERENCES

Lu, J.: Handbook of Measurement of Residual Stresses (The Fairmont Press, Lilburn, Georgia, 1996).Google Scholar
Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part I. Experimental studies in an aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Res. 11, 752 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part II. Finite element simulations. J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y-H. and Kwon, D.: Estimation of biaxial surface stress by instrumented indentation with sharp indenters. Acta Mater. 52, 1555 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suresh, S. and Giannakopoulos, A.E.: A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater. 46, 5755 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, S. and Larsoon, P-L.: On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing. Part I: Theoretical and numerical analysis. Acta Mater. 49, 2179 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, S. and Larsoon, P-L.: On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing. Part II: Experimental investigation. Acta Mater. 49, 2193 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y-H. and Kwon, D.: Measurement of residual-stress effect by nanoindentation on elastically strained (100) W. Scripta Mater. 49, 459 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Ozaki, K., Ishikawa, H., Nakano, S., and Ogiso, H.: Indentation method to measure the residual stress induced by ion implantation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 242, 88 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L., Ye, D., and Chen, C.: A further study on representative models for calculating the residual stress based on the instrumented indentation technique. Comput. Mater. Sci. 82, 476 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Z.K., Feng, Y.H., Peng, G.J., Yang, R., Huan, Y., and Zhang, T.H.: Estimation of surface equi-biaxial residual stress by using instrumented sharp indentation. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 614, 264 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, L., Ye, D., Chen, C., Liu, J., and Zhang, L.: Instrumented indentation measurements of residual stresses around a crack tip under single tensile overloads. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 78, 44 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taljat, B. and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of residual stress by load and depth sensing spherical indentation. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 594, 519 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swadener, J.G., Taljat, B., and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of residual stress by load and depth sensing indentation with spherical indenters. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2091 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, S-M., Park, S-Y., Kim, Y-C., Lee, K-S., and Kim, J-Y.: Surface residual stress in soda-lime glass evaluated using instrumented spherical indentation testing. J. Mater. Res. 50, 7752 (2015).Google Scholar
Shen, L., He, Y., Liu, D., Gong, Q., Zhang, B., and Lei, J.: A novel method for determining surface residual stress components and their directions in spherical indentation. J. Mater. Res. 30, 1078 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, J.H., Lee, J.S., Lee, Y.H., Choi, M.J., Lee, G.J., Kim, K.H., and Kwon, D.I.: Residual stress estimation with identification of stress directionality using instrumented indentation technique. Key Eng. Mater. 345–346, 1125 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, M-J., Kang, S-K., Kang, I., and Kwon, D.: Evaluation of nonequibiaxial residual stress using Knoop indenter. J. Mater. Res. 27, 121 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickhey, F., Lee, J.H., and Lee, H.: A contact size-independent approach to the estimation of biaxial residual stresses by Knoop indentation. Mater. Des. 84, 300 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y-C., Choi, M-J., Kwon, D., and Kim, J-Y.: Estimation of principal directions of bi-axial residual stress using instrumented Knoop indentation testing. Met. Mater. Int. 21, 850 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y-C., Ahn, H-J., Kwon, D., and Kim, J-Y.: Modeling and experimental verification for non-equibiaxial residual stress evaluated by Knoop indentations. Met. Mater. Int. 22, 12 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, S-K., Kim, J-Y., Park, C-P., Kim, H-U., and Kwon, D.: Conventional Vickers and true instrumented indentation hardness determined by instrumented indentation tests. J. Mater. Res. 25, 337 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, C., Feng, Y.H., Yang, R., Peng, G.J., Lu, Z.K., and Zhang, T.H.: An integrated method to determine elastic-plastic parameters by instrumented spherical indentation. J. Mater. Res. 29, 1095 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, H.: Miscellaneous Papers (Macmillan, London, 1896).Google Scholar
Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J.R.: Indentation hardness and hot pressing. Acta Metall. 28, 311 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, L.: The Pi theorem of dimensional analysis. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 1, 35 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ABAQUS: ABAQUS 6.11 User’s Manual (Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, Providence, Rhode Island, 2011).Google Scholar
Myers, S.M., Knapp, J.A., Follstaedt, D.M., and Dugger, M.T.: Mechanical properties of nickel ion-implanted with titanium and carbon and their relation to microstructure. J. Appl. Phys. 83, 1256 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, J.A., Follstaedt, D.M., Myers, S.M., Barbour, J.C., and Friedmann, T.A.: Finite-element modeling of nanoindentation. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 1460 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakopoulos, A.E.: The influence of initial elastic surface stresses on instrumented sharp indentation. J. Appl. Mech. 70, 638 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar