Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:10:53.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the usage of the effectively shaped indenter concept for analysis of yield strength

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. Herrmann  and
F. Richter
M. Herrmann*
Affiliation:
Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
F. Richter
Affiliation:
Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Physics, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Using the extended Hertzian approach (EHA), the “effectively shaped indenter” corresponding to Pharr's concept is described in terms of a parameter set {d0,d2,d4,d6}, which can be determined by a fitting procedure from the unloading curve of an indentation experiment. Owing to the limited accuracy of measurement, a given experimental curve may in principle correspond to more than one such parameter set. Based on indentation experiments with a Berkovich indenter into fused silica, we have investigated the influence of the fitting procedure itself on the results. We suggest a certain manual fitting procedure, which delivered a yield strength Y = (7.1 ± 0.1) GPa independent of the maximum load. Manual fitting always includes some degree of subjectivity, however, both Y and the elastic field as a whole proved to be relatively robust against modifications of the parameter set. We also suggest a preliminary objective procedure, which delivered Y = 6.8 − 7.1 GPa. In addition, we have performed finite element method (FEM) simulations of elastic–plastic indentations of a conical indenter into a von Mises solid with a yield strength of Y = 7.0 GPa. The simulated unloading curve was analyzed using the EHA in the same manner as the experimental curves, and yield strength of 6.95 GPa was obtained being very close to the input value of the FEM.

Keywords

Elastic propertiesHardnessNanoindentation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2009 , pp. 1258 - 1269
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3 (2004).Google Scholar
2.Pharr, G.M. and Bolshakov, A.: Understanding nanoindentation unloading curves. J. Mater. Res. 17, 2660 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sneddon, I.N.: The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Schwarzer, N.: Elastic surface deformation due to indenters with arbitrary symmetry of revolution. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37, 2761 (2004).Google Scholar
5.Schwarzer, N. and Pharr, G.M.: On the evaluation of stresses during nanoindentation with sharp indenters. Thin Solid Films 469/470, 194 (2004).Google Scholar
6.Schwarzer, N.: Arbitrary load distribution on a layered half space. ASME J. Tribol. 122, 672 (2000).Google Scholar
7.Schwarzer, N., Chudoba, T., and Richter, F.: Investigation of ultra thin coatings using nanoindentation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 5566 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Loubet, J.L., Georges, J.M., Marchesini, O., and Meille, G.: Vickers indentation curves of magnesium oxide (MgO). ASME J. Tribol. 106, 43 (1984).Google Scholar
10.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D.: A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments. J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hay, J.C., Bolshakov, A., and Pharr, G.M.: A critical examination of the fundamental relations used in the analysis of nanoindentation data. J. Mater. Res. 14, 2296 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Woirgard, J. and Dargenton, J.C.: An alternative method for penetration depth determination in nanoindentation measurements. J. Mater. Res. 12, 2455 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Hertz, H.: On the contact of elastic solids. J. Reine Angew. Mech. 92, 156 (1881).Google Scholar
14.Hertz, H.: Hertz's Miscellaneous Papers (Macmillan, London, 1896), p. 146.Google Scholar
15.Fabrikant, V.I.: Application of Potential Theory in Mechanics: A Selection of New Results (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989).Google Scholar
16.Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N., and Richter, F.: New possibilities of mechanical surface characterization with spherical indenters by comparison of experimental and theoretical results. Thin Solid Films 355/356, 284 (1999).Google Scholar
17.Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N., and Richter, F.: Determination of elastic properties of thin films by indentation measurements with a spherical indenter. Surf. Coat. Technol. 127, 9 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Chudoba, T., Griepentrog, M., Duck, A., Schneider, D., and Richter, F.: Young's modulus measurements on ultra-thin coatings. J. Mater. Res. 19, 301 (2004).Google Scholar
19.Richter, F., Herrmann, M., Molnar, F., Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N., Keunecke, M., Bewilogua, K., Zhang, X.W., Boyen, H.G., and Ziemann, P.: Substrate influence in Young's modulus determination of thin films by indentation methods: Cubic boron nitride as an example. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 3577 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N., Richter, F., and Beck, U.: Determination of mechanical film properties of a bilayer system due to elastic indentation measurements with a spherical indenter. Thin Solid Films 377/378, 366 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Chudoba, T., Schwarzer, N., and Richter, F.: Steps towards a mechanical modeling of layered systems. Surf. Coat. Technol. 154, 140 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Schwarzer, N.: Coating design due to analytical modelling of mechanical contact problems on multilayer systems. Surf. Coat. Technol. 133/134, 397 (2000).Google Scholar
23.Puschmann, R., Schwarzer, N., Richter, F., Fruehauf, S., and Schulz, S. E.: A usable concept for the indentation of thin porous films. Z. Metallkd. 96, 1272 (2005).Google Scholar
24. Filmdoctor. Available at: http://www.siomec.de/filmdoctor.Google Scholar
25.Field, J.S. and Swain, M.V.: A simple predictive model for spherical indentation. J. Mater. Res. 8, 297 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Chudoba, T. and Griepentrog, M.: Comparison between conventional Vickers hardness and indentation hardness obtained with different instruments. Z. Metallkd. 96, 1242 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. AFischer-Cripps, C.: Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nanoindentation test data. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 4153 (2006).Google Scholar
28.Malzbender, J. and de With, G.: Indentation load-displacement curve, plastic deformation, and energy. J. Mater. Res. 17, 502 (2002).Google Scholar