Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T13:44:50.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novel ABS-based binary and ternary polymer blends for material extrusion 3D printing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2014

Carmen R. Rocha ,
Angel R. Torrado Perez ,
David A. Roberson ,
Corey M. Shemelya ,
Eric MacDonald  and
Ryan B. Wicker
Carmen R. Rocha
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA; and Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Angel R. Torrado Perez
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA; and Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
David A. Roberson*
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA; and Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Corey M. Shemelya
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA; and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Eric MacDonald
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA; and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Ryan B. Wicker
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Center for 3D Innovation, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA; and Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Material extrusion 3D printing (ME3DP) based on fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology is currently the most commonly used additive manufacturing method. However, ME3DP suffers from a limitation of compatible materials and typically relies upon amorphous thermoplastics, such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). The work presented here demonstrates the development and implementation of binary and ternary polymeric blends for ME3DP. Multiple blends of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), styrene ethylene butadiene styrene (SEBS), and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) were created through a twin screw compounding process to produce novel polymer blends compatible with ME3DP platforms. Mechanical testing and fractography were used to characterize the different physical properties of these new blends. Though the new blends possessed different physical properties, compatibility with ME3DP platforms was maintained. Also, a decrease in surface roughness of a standard test piece was observed for some blends as compared with ABS.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 17: Focus Issue: The Materials Science of Additive Manufacturing , 14 September 2014 , pp. 1859 - 1866
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Chang, D-Y. and Huang, B-H: Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modeling process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 53, 1027–1037 (2011).Google Scholar
ASTM Standard F2792-12a: Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012).Google Scholar
Roberson, D.A., Espalin, D., and Wicker, R.B.: 3D printer selection: A decision-making evaluation and ranking model. Virtual Phys. Prototyping 8, 201–212 (2013).Google Scholar
Crump, S.S.: The fused deposition modeling (FDM). U.S. Patent Nos. 5,121,329 and 5,340,433, 1988.Google Scholar
Masood, S. and Song, W.: Development of new metal/polymer materials for rapid tooling using fused deposition modelling. Mater. Des. 25, 587–594 (2004).Google Scholar
Nikzad, M., Masood, S.H., and Sbarski, I.: Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for fused deposition modeling. Mater. Des. 32, 3448–3456 (2011).Google Scholar
Safari, A. and Akdogan, E.K.: Rapid prototyping of novel piezoelectric composites. Ferroelectrics 331, 153–179 (2006).Google Scholar
Shofner, M.L., Lozano, K., Rodríguez-Macías, F.J., and Barrera, E.V.: Nanofiber-reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 89, 3081–3090 (2003).Google Scholar
Jelčić, Ž., Vranješ, N., and Rek, V.: Long-range processing correlation and morphological fractality of compatibilized blends of PS/HDPE/SEBS block copolymer. Macromol. Symp. 290, 1–14 (2010).Google Scholar
Huang, J.J., Keskkula, H., and Paul, D.R.: Rubber toughening of an amorphous polyamide by functionalized SEBS copolymers: Morphology and Izod impact behavior. Polymer 45, 4203–4215 (2004).Google Scholar
Oshinski, A.J., Keskkula, H., and Paul, D.R.: Rubber toughening of polyamides with functionalized block copolymers: 1. Nylon-6. Polymer 33, 268–283 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanrattanakul, V., Hiltner, A., Baer, E., Perkins, W. G., Massey, F.L., and Moet, A., “Toughening PET by blending with a functionalized SEBS block copolymer,” Polymer, 38(9), 2191–2200 (1997).Google Scholar
Charles, E. and Carraher, Jr.: Introduction to Polymer Chemistry, 3rd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, December 4, 2012), p. 298.Google Scholar
Lim, K.L.K., Ishak, Z.A.M., Ishiaku, U.S., Fuad, A.M.Y., Yusof, A.H., Czigany, T., Pukanszky, B., and Ogunniyi, D.S., “High-density polyethylene/ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene blend. I. The processing, thermal, and mechanical properties,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 413–425, Jul. 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A.K. and Purwar, S.N.: Melt rheological properties of polypropylene/SEBS (styrene–ethylene butylene–styrene block copolymer) blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 29, 1079–1093 (1984).Google Scholar
Stricker, F., Thomann, Y., and Mülhaupt, R.: Influence of rubber particle size on mechanical properties of polypropylene–SEBS blends. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 68, 1891–1901 (1998).Google Scholar
ASTM Standard D638: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 2010).Google Scholar
Pandey, P.M., Venkata Reddy, N., and Dhande, S.G.: Improvement of surface finish by staircase machining in fused deposition modeling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 132, 323–331 (2003).Google Scholar
Perez, A.R.T., Roberson, D.A., and Wicker, R.B.: Fracture surface analysis of 3D-Printed tensile specimens of novel ABS-based materials. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 1–11 (2014) doi:10.1007/s11668-014-9803-9.Google Scholar
Engel, L., Klingele, H., Ehrenstein, G.W., and Schaper, H.: An Atlas of Polymer Damage: Surface Examination by Scanning Electron Microscope (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1981).Google Scholar