Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T09:33:16.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear optical properties of TeO2-based glasses: Li(Na and K)2O–TeO2 binary glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Sae-Hoon Kim
Sae-Hoon Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic Engineering, Kangnung National University, Kangnung, Kangwondo 210–702, Korea
Get access

Abstract

The third-order nonlinear optical susceptibilities, χ(3), of the xLi(Na and K)2O · (100 − x)TeO2 binary glasses have been measured by the third harmonic generation (THG) method. It is found that the χ(3) of each series of glasses decreases with increasing alkali oxide content. The largest χ(3) values obtained are about 1.3 × 10−12 esu for a 7.5Li2O · 92.5TeO2 glass, being about 45 times larger than that of fused silica glass for the present series samples. For the purpose of investigating the relationship between the χ(3) and the optical parameters, such as linear refractive index, polarizability per unit volume which is represented by the term (nω2 – 1)/(nω2 + 2), dispersion energy (Ed) which is related to the Abbé number, and excitation energy (E0) which is closely related to the optical band gap (Eg), we derived the equations that relate the χ(3) to optical parameters on the basis of Lines’ model. Finally, it was experimentally confirmed that the χ(3) value of alkali oxide-TeO2 glasses is proportional to the term (nω2 + 2)3 (nω2 – 1) · Ed/E02

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , March 1999 , pp. 1074 - 1083
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Walker, A.C., Glass Technol. 28, 155 (1987).Google Scholar
2.Vogel, E.M., Weber, M. J., and Krol, D.M., Glass Technol. 32, 231 (1991).Google Scholar
3.Adair, R., Chase, L. L., and Payne, S. A., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B4, 875 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Adair, R., Chase, L.L., and Payne, S.A., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B39, 3337 (1989).Google Scholar
5.Nasu, H., Ibara, Y., and Kubodera, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 110, 229 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kim, S.H., Yoko, T., Miyaji, F., and Sakka, S., Proc. Int. Conf. on Science and Technology of New Glasses (1991), p. 187.Google Scholar
7.Vogel, W., Burger, H., Muler, B., Zerge, G., Muler, W., and Forkel, K., Silikattechnik 25, 205 (1974).Google Scholar
8.Chen, Y., The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1984), p. 127.Google Scholar
9.Volf, M. B., in Glass Science and Technology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984), Vol. 7, p. 43.Google Scholar
10.Kim, S.H., Yoko, T., and Sakka, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 865 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kim, S. H., Yoko, T., and Sakka, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 2486 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Wemple, S. H., J. Chem. Phys. 67, 2151 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Wemple, S. H. and DiDomenico, M. Jr, Phys. Rev. B3, 1338 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Dimitrov, V.V., Kim, S.H., Yoko, T., and Sakka, S., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 101, 59 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Meredith, G. R., Suchalter, S., and Hanzlik, C., J. Chem. Phys. 78, 1533 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Kim, S. H., Yoko, T., and Sakka, S., Bull. Inst. Chem. Res., Kyoto Univ., 72, 178 (1994).Google Scholar
17.Kim, S. H., Doctoral Thesis, Kyoto Univ., 1 (1993).Google Scholar
18.Kajzar, F. and Messier, J., Nonlinear Optical Properties of Organic Molecules and Crystals, edited by Chemla, D. S. and Zyss, J. (Academic Press, New York, 1987), Vol. 2, p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Hashimoto, T., Yoko, T., and Sakka, S., Bull. Inst. Chem. Res., Kyoto Univ., 71, 420 (1993).Google Scholar
20.Terashima, K., Kim, S. H., and Yoko, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 2903 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Kajzar, F., Messier, J., and Rosilio, C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 60, 50 (1986).Google Scholar
22.Tessman, J. R., Kahn, A. H., and Shockley, W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92, 890 (1953).Google Scholar
23.Boling, N.L., Glass, A.J., and Owyoung, A., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE–14, 601 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Wang, C.C., Phys. Rev. B2, 2045 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Lines, M.E., Phys. Rev. B41, 3372 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Lines, M.E., Phys. Rev. B41, 3383 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Lines, M.E., Phys. Rev. B43, 11978 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Hellwarth, R.W., 5, 1 (1977).Google Scholar
29.Kim, S.H. and Yoko, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 1061 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar