Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:17:55.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nano-tribology studies of reduced graphene oxide films in air and in aqueous solutions with different pH values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2016

Pengfei Li
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Power Energy Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People’s Republic of China; and School of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, People’s Republic of China
Xianhua Cheng*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Power Energy Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People’s Republic of China; and State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People’s Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this study, three types of graphene films—hydrothermal reduced graphene oxide (GO) film, thermal reduced GO film, and GO film—on silicon substrate by using 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) as the interface adhesive layer were prepared for investigation. The chemical compositions of the samples were characterized by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Surface morphologies, adhesive forces, and nano friction forces in air and aqueous solutions with different pH values were investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Results showed that capillary force dominated the adhesive force in air condition, and adhesive force was much smaller in aqueous solution than in air due to the disappearance of the capillary force. Adhesive force and friction coefficient of the three samples slightly decreased with the increase of pH values. Hydrothermal reduced GO film exhibits the best lubricity both in air and in liquids among those three films.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ko, J.H., Kwon, S., Byun, I.S., Choi, J.S., Park, B.H., Kim, Y.H., and Park, J.Y.: Nanotribological properties of fluorinated, hydrogenated, and oxidized graphenes. Tribol. Lett. 50, 137 (2013).Google Scholar
Choi, J.S., Kim, J.S., Byun, I.S., Lee, D.H., Lee, M.J., Park, B.H., Lee, C., Yoon, D., Cheong, H., Lee, K.H., Son, Y.W., Park, J.Y., and Salmeron, M.: Friction anisotropy-driven domain imaging on exfoliated monolayer graphene. Science 333, 607 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filleter, T., McChesney, J., Bostwick, A., Rotenberg, E., Emtsev, K., Seyller, T., Horn, K., and Bennewitz, R.: Friction and dissipation in epitaxial graphene films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 086102 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J.W., and Hone, J.: Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321, 385 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compton, O.C. and Nguyen, S.T.: Graphene oxide, highly reduced graphene oxide, and graphene: Versatile building blocks for carbon-based materials. Small 6, 711 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, Z., Klimov, N.N., Solares, S.D., Li, T., Xu, H., and Cannara, R.J.: Nanoscale interfacial friction and adhesion on supported versus suspended monolayer and multilayer graphene. Langmuir 29, 235 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, L.Y., Kim, D.E., Kim, W.K., and Jun, S.C.: Friction and wear characteristics of multi-layer graphene films investigated by atomic force microscopy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 205, 4864 (2011).Google Scholar
Berman, D., Erdemir, A., and Sumant, A.V.: Few layer graphene to reduce wear and friction on sliding steel surfaces. Carbon 54, 454 (2013).Google Scholar
Dou, X., Koltonow, A.R., He, X., Jang, H.D., Wang, Q., Chung, Y-W., and Huang, J.: Self-dispersed crumpled graphene balls in oil for friction and wear reduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 1528 (2013).Google Scholar
Li, P.F., Zhou, H., and Cheng, X.H.: Investigation of a hydrothermal reduced graphene oxide nano coating on Ti substrate and its nano-tribological behavior. Surf. Coat. Technol. 254, 298 (2014).Google Scholar
Li, P.F., Zhou, H., and Cheng, X.H.: Nano/micro tribological behaviors of a self-assembled graphene oxide nanolayer on Ti/titanium alloy substrates. Appl. Surf. Sci. 285, 937 (2013).Google Scholar
Liu, Z.H., Shu, D., Li, P.F., and Cheng, X.H.: Tribology study of lanthanum-treated graphene oxide thin film on silicon substrate. RSC Adv. 4, 15937 (2014).Google Scholar
Ou, J., Wang, J., Liu, S., Mu, B., Ren, J., Wang, H., and Yang, S.: Tribology study of reduced graphene oxide sheets on silicon substrate synthesized via covalent assembly. Langmuir 26, 15830 (2010).Google Scholar
Li, D., Muller, M.B., Gilje, S., Kaner, R.B., and Wallace, G.G.: Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 101 (2008).Google Scholar
Yang, D., Velamakanni, A., Bozoklu, G., Park, S., Stoller, M., Piner, R.D., Stankovich, S., Jung, I., Field, D.A., Ventrice, C.A., and Ruoff, R.S.: Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by x-ray photoelectron and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Carbon 47, 145 (2009).Google Scholar
Becerril, H.A., Mao, J., Liu, Z., Stoltenberg, R.M., Bao, Z., and Chen, Y.: Evaluation of solution-processed reduced graphene oxide films as transparent conductors. ACS Nano 2, 463 (2008).Google Scholar
Shin, H.J., Kim, K.K., Benayad, A., Yoon, S.M., Park, H.K., Jung, I.S., Jin, M.H., Jeong, H.K., Kim, J.M., Choi, J.Y., and Lee, Y.H.: Efficient reduction of graphite oxide by sodium borohydride and its effect on electrical conductance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1987 (2009).Google Scholar
Gao, W., Alemany, L.B., Ci, L.J., and Ajayan, P.M.: New insights into the structure and reduction of graphite oxide. Nat. Chem. 1, 403 (2009).Google Scholar
Stankovich, S.D., Piner, R.D., Kohlhaas, K.A., Kleinhammes, A., and Jia, Y.: Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45, 1558 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Bao, Q., Tang, L.A.L., Zhong, Y., and Loh, K.P.: Hydrothermal dehydration for the “Green” reduction of exfoliated graphene oxide to graphene and demonstration of tunable optical limiting properties. Chem. Mater. 21, 2950 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Zhi, L.J., and Mullen, K.: Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett. 8, 323 (2008).Google Scholar
Pei, S., Zhao, J., Du, J., Ren, W., and Cheng, H-M.: Direct reduction of graphene oxide films into highly conductive and flexible graphene films by hydrohalic acids. Carbon 48, 4466 (2010).Google Scholar
Robinson, B.J., Kay, N.D., and Kolosov, O.V.: Nanoscale interfacial interactions of graphene with polar and nonpolar liquids. Langmuir 29, 7735 (2013).Google Scholar
Minatchy, G., Thomas, P., Bilas, P., Nomede-Martyr, N., and Romana, L.: Macro- and nanotribological properties of graphite tribofilms: Influence of the sliding interface. Tribol. Lett. 56, 443 (2014).Google Scholar
Ou, J., Liu, L., Wang, J., Wang, F., Xue, M., and Li, W.: Fabrication and tribological investigation of a novel hydrophobic polydopamine/graphene oxide multilayer film. Tribol. Lett. 48, 407 (2012).Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Wu, T., and Evans, D.L.: Lateral force microscopy study on the shear properties of self-assembled monolayers of dialkylammonium surfactant on mica. Langmuir 10, 2241 (1994).Google Scholar
Dreyer, D.R., Park, S., Bielawski, C.W., and Ruoff, R.S.: The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 228 (2010).Google Scholar
Lerf, A., Forster, M., and Klinowski, J.: Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 4477 (1998).Google Scholar
Song, S.Y., Chu, R.Q., Zhou, J.F., Yang, S.G., and Zhang, J.Y.: Formation and tribology study of amide-containing stratified self-assembled monolayers: Influences of the underlayer structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 3805 (2008).Google Scholar
Gao, X.F., Jang, J., and Nagase, S.: Hydrazine and thermal reduction of graphene Oxide: Reaction mechanisms, product structures, and reaction design. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 832 (2010).Google Scholar
Park, S. and Ruoff, R.S.: Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 21 (2009).Google Scholar
Li, P.F., Xu, Y., and Cheng, X.H.: Chemisorption of thermal reduced graphene oxide nano-layer film on TNTZ surface and its tribological behavior. Surf. Coat. Technol. 232, 331 (2013).Google Scholar
Su, C.Y., Xu, Y.P., Zhang, W.J., Zhao, J.W., Tang, X.H., Tsai, C.H., and Li, L.J.: Electrical and spectroscopic characterizations of ultra-large reduced graphene oxide monolayers. Chem. Mater. 21, 5674 (2009).Google Scholar
Pei, S. and Cheng, H.M.: The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50, 3210 (2012).Google Scholar
Ding, Y.H., Zhang, P., Ren, H.M., Zhuo, Q., Yang, Z.M., Jiang, X., and Jiang, Y.: Surface adhesion properties of graphene and graphene oxide studied by colloid-probe atomic force microscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 1077 (2011).Google Scholar
Xiao, X.D. and Qian, L.M.: Investigation of humidity-dependent capillary force. Langmuir 16, 8153 (2000).Google Scholar
Ito, T., Namba, M., Buhlmann, P., and Umezawa, Y.: Modification of silicon nitride tips with trichlorosilane self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) for chemical force microscopy. Langmuir 13, 4323 (1997).Google Scholar
Hamaker, H.C.: The London-van der Waals attraction between spherical particles. Physica 4, 1058 (1937).Google Scholar
Noskov, S., Scherer, C., and Maskos, M.: Determination of Hamaker constants of polymeric nanoparticles in organic solvents by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation. J. Chromatogr. A 1274, 151 (2013).Google Scholar
Senden, T.J. and Drummond, C.J.: Surface chemistry and tip-sample interactions in atomic force microscopy. Colloids Surf., A 94, 29 (1995).Google Scholar
Tsukruk, V.V. and Bliznyuk, V.N.: Adhesive and friction forces between chemically modified silicon and silicon nitride surfaces. Langmuir 14, 446 (1998).Google Scholar
Hu, X., Yu, Y., Hou, W., Zhou, J., and Song, L.: Effects of particle size and pH value on the hydrophilicity of graphene oxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 273, 118 (2013).Google Scholar
Foster, T.T., Alexander, M.R., Leggett, G.J., and McAlpine, E.: Friction force microscopy of alkylphosphonic acid and carboxylic acids adsorbed on the native oxide of aluminum. Langmuir 22, 9254 (2006).Google Scholar
Brewer, N.J., Beake, B.D., and Leggett, G.J.: Friction force microscopy of self-assembled monolayers: Influence of adsorbate alkyl chain length, terminal group chemistry, and scan velocity. Langmuir 17, 1970 (2001).Google Scholar
Peng, Y., Wang, Z., and Li, C.: Study of nanotribological properties of multilayer graphene by calibrated atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 25, 305701 (2014).Google Scholar
Lee, C., Li, Q., Kalb, W., Liu, X.Z., Berger, H., Carpick, R.W., and Hone, J.: Frictional characteristics of atomically thin sheets. Science 328, 76 (2010).Google Scholar
Li, Q.Y., Lee, C., Carpick, R.W., and Hone, J.: Substrate effect on thickness-dependent friction on graphene. Phys. Status Solidi B 247, 2909 (2010).Google Scholar