Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:20:53.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A microstructure diagram for known bounds in conductivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Shiwei Zhou  and
Qing Li
Shiwei Zhou
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Qing Li*
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two important analytical means—theoretical bounds and homogenization techniques—have gained increasing attention and led to substantial progress in material research. Nevertheless, there is a lack of relating material microstructures to an entire theoretical bound and exploring the possibility of generating multiple microstructures for each property value. This paper aims to provide a microstructure diagram in relation to “bound B” constructed by translation and Weiner bounds. The inverse homogenization technique is used to seek for the optimal phase distribution within a base cell model to make the effective conductivity approach the “bound B” in two- or three-phase material cases. The design shows that the “bound B” is exactly attainable for two-phase composites even with single-length-scale microstructures. Although the multiphase translations bounds are well known to be asymptotically attainable on some parts, they still appear too roomy to be attained by single-length-scale composites. Our results showed a certain improvement in the attainability of single-length-scale structural composites when compared with new bounds established by [V. Nesi: Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A125, 1219 (1995)], [V. Cherkaev: Variational Methods for Structural Optimization (Springer Verlag, New York, 2000)], and (N. Albin et al.: Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A463, 2031 (2007)]. Applicability of the translation bounds to the composites with high-contrast conductivities of phase compositions is also studied in this paper. Finally, we explore the multiple solutions to the optimal microstructures and categorize them into three classes in line with their topological resemblance, namely, spatially identical, unidirectionally identical, and bidirectionally different solutions.

Keywords

CompositeMicrostructureThermal conductivity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , March 2008 , pp. 798 - 811
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Wiener, O.: The theory of the composite for the field of the stationary current. Abh. Math.-Phys. Kl. Koniglich Saechs Akad. Wiss. 32, 509 1912Google Scholar
2Hashin, Z., Shtrikman, S.: A variational approach to theory of effective magnetic permeability of multiphase materials. J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3125 1962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Hashin, Z., Shtrikman, S.: A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11, 127 1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Lurie, K.A., Cherkaev, A.V.: Exact estimates of conductivity of composites formed by two isotropically conducting media taken in prescribed proportion. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 99, 71 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Lurie, K.A., Cherkaev, A.V.: Exact estimates of the conductivity of a binary mixture of isotropic materials. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 104, 21 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Milton, G.W., Kohn, R.V.: Variational bounds on the effective moduli of anisotropic composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 36, 597 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Tartar, L.: Estimation bounds of coefficients homogenization. In Ennio de Giorgi Colloquium Research Notes in Mathematics, edited by P. Krée Pitman London 1985 125Google Scholar
8Zhikov, V.V.: Estimates for the trace of an averaged matrix. Math. Notes 40, 628 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Albin, N., Cherkaev, A.V., Nesi, V.: Multiphase, laminates of extremal effective conductivity in two dimensions. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 1513 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Lurie, K.A., Cherkaev, A.V.: Optimisation of properties of multicomponent isotropic composites. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 46, 571 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Milton, G.W.: Concerning bounds on the transport and mechanical-properties of multicomponent composite-materials. Appl. Phys. A 26, 125 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Gibiansky, L.V., Sigmund, O.: Multiphase composites with extremal bulk modulus. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48, 461 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Albin, N.: Optimality of the translation bounds for linear conducting composites in two and three dimensions. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT,2006Google Scholar
14Nesi, V.: Bounds on the effective conductivity of two-dimensional composites made of n ⩾ 3 isotropic phases in prescribed volume fraction: The weighted translation method. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 125, 1219 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Alessandrini, G., Nesi, V.: Univalent σ-harmonic mappings. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 158, 155 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Bauman, P., Marini, A., Nesi, V.: Univalent solutions of an elliptic system of partial differential equations arising in homogenization. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 50, 747 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Albin, N., Conti, S., Nesi, V.: Improved bounds for composites and rigidity of gradient fields. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 463, 2031 2007Google Scholar
18Cherkaev, A.V.: Variational Methods for Structural Optimisation Springer New York 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Cherkaev, A.V., Gibiansky, L.V.: Extremal structures of multiphase heat conducting composites. Int. J. Solids Struct. 33, 2609 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Briane, M., Nesi, V.: Is it wise to keep laminating? ESAIM: Contr. Optimis. Calc. Variat. 10, 452 2004Google Scholar
21Schulgasser, K.: Relationship between single-crystal and polycrystal electrical conductivity. J. Appl. Phys. 47, 1880 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Hyun, S., Torquato, S.: Optimal and manufacturable two-dimensional, Kagome-like cellular solids. J. Mater. Res. 17, 137 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Vigdergauz, S.: 2-Dimensional grained composites of extreme rigidity. J. Appl. Mech.—Trans. ASME 61, 390 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Syozi, I.: Statistics of Kagome lattice. Prog. Theor. Phys. 6, 306 1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Zhou, S.W., Li, Q.: Design of multiphase conductive composites and relation to constant mean curvature surfaces. J. Phys. D 40, 6083 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Golden, K., Papanicolaou, G.: Bounds for effective parameters of heterogeneous media by analytic continuation. Commun. Math. Phys. 90, 473 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Sigmund, O.: Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters—an inverse homogenization problem. Int. J. Solids Struct. 31, 2313 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Bendsøe, M.P., Sigmund, O.: Topology Optimisation: Theory, Methods, and Applications Springer-Verlag Berlin 2003Google Scholar
29Chen, B.C.: Optimal design of material microstructures and optimization of structural topology for design-dependent loads.Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,, 2000Google Scholar
30Guest, J.K., Prevost, J.H.: Optimizing multifunctional materials: Design of microstructures for maximized stiffness and fluid permeability. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 7028 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Hyun, S., Torquato, S.: Designing composite microstructures with targeted properties. J. Mater. Res. 16, 280 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32de Kruijf, N., Zhou, S.W., Li, Q., Mai, Y.W.: Topological design. of structures and composite materials with multiobjectives. Int. J. Solids Struct. 44, 7092 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Li, Q., Steven, G.P., Querin, O.M., Xie, Y.M.: Shape and topology design for heat conduction by evolutionary structural optimisation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 42, 3361 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Sigmund, O., Torquato, S.: Composites with extremal thermal expansion coefficients. Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3203 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Sigmund, O., Torquato, S., Aksay, I.A.: On the design of 1-3 piezocomposites using topology optimisation. J. Mater. Res. 13, 1038 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Yang, W., Li, Z.M., Shi, W., Xie, B-H., Yang, M-B.: Review on auxetic materials. J. Mater. Sci. 39, 3269 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Torquato, S., Hyun, S., Donev, A.: Multifunctional composites: Optimizing microstructures for simultaneous transport of heat and electricity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 266601 2002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Torquato, S.: Random Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure And Macroscopic Properties Springer New York 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39Bendsøe, M.P., Kikuchi, N.: Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 71, 197 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Bensoussan, A., Papanicolaou, G., Lions, J.L.: Asymptotic Analysis for Periodic Structures North Holland Publ. Co. Amsterdam 1978Google Scholar
41Sanchez-Palencia, E.: Non-homogeneous Media and Vibration Theory Springer-Verlag Berlin 1980Google Scholar
42Cheng, K.T., Olhoff, N.: An investigation concerning optimal-design of solid elastic plates. Int. J. Solids Struct. 17, 305 1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Bendsøe, M.P.: Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct. Optim. 1, 193 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Bendsøe, M.P., Sigmund, O.: Material interpolation schemes in topology optimisation. Arch. Appl. Mech. 69, 635 1999Google Scholar
45Haber, R.B., Jog, C.S., Bendsøe, M.P.: A new approach to variable-topology shape design using a constraint on perimeter. Struct. Optim. 11, 1 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Sigmund, O., Petersson, J.: Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Struct. Optim. 16, 68 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Li, Q., Steven, G.P., Xie, Y.M.: A simple checkerboard suppression algorithm for evolutionary structural optimization. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 22, 230 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48Sigmund, O.: Design of material structures using topology optimization.Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby Denmark,, 1994Google Scholar
49Charbonnier, P., Blanc-Feraud, L., Aubert, G., Barlaud, M.: Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6, 298 1997CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Wang, M.Y., Zhou, S., Ding, H.: Nonlinear diffusions in topology optimisation. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 28, 262 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51Svanberg, K.: The method of moving asymptotes—A new method for structural optimisation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 24, 359 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52Haug, E.J., Choi, K.K., Komkov, V.: Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems Academic Press Orlando 1986Google Scholar
53Astala, K., Nesi, V.: Composites and quasiconformal mappings: new optimal bounds in two dimensions. Calc. Var. Partial Diff. Eqns. 18, 335 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Hyun, S., Torquato, S.: Effective elastic and transport properties of regular honeycombs for all densities. J. Mater. Res. 15, 1985 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55Zhou, S., Li, Q.: Computational design of multi-phase microstructural materials for extremal conductivity. Comput. Mater. Sci. in press, 2008, DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar