Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:56:31.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties of the interface layer of coated steel insert-aluminum bimetals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

Maryam Salimi ,
Medhi Malekan ,
Bahram Nami  and
Hamed Hoseiny
Maryam Salimi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU), Tehran 1678815811, Iran
Medhi Malekan*
Affiliation:
School of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417614418, Iran
Bahram Nami
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU), Tehran 1678815811, Iran
Hamed Hoseiny
Affiliation:
Corrosion Research Group, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI), Tehran 1485733111, Iran
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The effect of aluminizing and Cu electroplating of the steel insert in fabrication of Al-matrix bimetal on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the interface layer was investigated. Compound casting process was used to fabricate Al-matrix bimetals reinforced with coated steel insert. The microstructures at the interface region were studied using light optical and scanning electron microscopes and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The interfacial shear strengths of the fabricated bimetals were compared using push-out test. The results showed that electroplating with copper and aluminizing of steel insert in aluminum matrix led to significant improvement of metallurgical bonding between the steel and aluminum cast matrix. Cu-coated insert contained a thicker and uniform reaction layer formed at the interface between the steel insert and aluminum matrix compared to aluminized coated insert. The results of push-out tests indicated higher interfacial shear strength for the bimetal with Cu-coated insert despite possessing a larger thickness.

Keywords

compound castingbimetalmicrostructureinterfacial shear strengthcopper coatingaluminizing
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 32 , Issue 4 , 28 February 2017 , pp. 874 - 882
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert

References

REFERENCES

Vaila, J.C., Peronnet, M., Barbeau, F., Bosselet, F., and Bouix, J.: Interface chemistry in aluminum alloy castings reinforced with iron base insert. Composites, Part A 33, 1417 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouayad, A., Gerometta, C., Radouani, M., and Saka, A.: Interface characterization in aluminum alloy casting reinforced with SG iron insert. J. Adv. Res. Mech. Eng. 1, 226 (2010).Google Scholar
Papis, K.J.M., Hallstedt, B., Löffler, J.F., and Uggowitzer, P.J.: Interface formation in aluminum–aluminum compound casting. Acta Mater. 56, 3036 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjari, E., Divandari, M., Razavi, S.H., Homma, T., and Kamado, S.: Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties of Al 413/Mg joint in compound casting process. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43, 4667 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zare, G.R., Divandari, M., and Arabi, H.: Investigation on interface of Al/Cu couples in compound casting. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 29, 190 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khoonsari, E.M., Jalilian, F., Paray, F., Emadi, D., and Drew, R.A.L.: Interaction of 308 stainless steel insert with A319 aluminum casting alloy. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 26, 833 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckner, J.: Cold metal transfer has a future joining steel to aluminum. Weld. J. 84, 38 (2005).Google Scholar
Pontevichi, S., Bosselet, F., Barbeau, F., Peronnet, M., and Viala, J.C.: Solid-liquid phase equilibria in the Al–Fe–Si system at 727 °C. J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 25, 528 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguado, E., Baquedano, A., Uribe, U., Fernández-Calvo, A.I., and Niklas, A.: Comparative study of different interfaces of steel inserts in aluminum castings. Mater. Sci. Forum 765, 711 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choe, K.H., Park, K.S., Kang, B.H., Cho, G.S., Kim, K.Y., Lee, K.W., Kim, M.H., Ikenaga, A., and Koroyasu, S.: Study of the interface between steel insert and aluminum casting in EPC. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 24, 60 (2008).Google Scholar
Lemmens, B., Caklu, B., de Strycker, J., and Verbeken, K.: The effect of Si on the intermetallics formation during hot dip aluminizing. J. Adv. Mater. Res. 922, 429 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.J. and Chen, S.M.: The high-temperature oxidation behavior of hot-dipping Al–Si coating on low carbon steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 6601 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, F.C., Zhao, M.X., Liu, Y.X., Han, W., and Li, Z.: Effect of Si on growth kinetics of intermetallic compounds during reaction between solid iron and molten aluminum. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23, 556 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, T.S. and Tu, S.H.: Interaction of steel with pure Al, Al–7Si and A356 alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 454–455, 349 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W.J. and Wang, C.J.: Microstructural evaluation of intermetallic layer in hot-dipped aluminide mild steel with silicon addition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 205, 4726 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kattner, U.R.: Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1990).Google Scholar
Ghosh, G.: Aluminium–iron–silicon, Light Metal Systems: Phase Diagrams, Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data. Landolt–Börnstein, New Series IV, Vol. 11A2 (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2005).Google Scholar
Ghosh, G.: Cost 507. Final Report Group B, The European Commission, 1998.Google Scholar
Ghosh, G.: Ternary Alloys, Vol. 5 (VCH publisher, Weinheim, Germany, 1992).Google Scholar
Raghavan, V.J.: Al–Fe–Si aluminum–iron–silicon, section II: Phase diagram evaluations. J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 23, 362 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akdeniz, M.V. and Mekhrabov, A.O.: The effect of substitutional impurities on evolution of Fe–Al diffusion layer. Acta Mater. 46, 1185 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragner, W., Zberg, B., Sonnleitner, R., Uggowitzer, P.J., and Löffler, J.F.: Interface reactions of Al and binary Al-alloys on mild steel substrates in controlled atmosphere. Mater. Sci. Forum 519–521, 1157 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezellus, O., Digonnet, B., and Sacerdote-peronnet, M.: Mechanical testing of steel/aluminum-silicon interface by push-out. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 27, 417 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezellus, O., Milani, L., Bosselet, F., Sacerdote-Peronnet, M., and Viala, J.C.: Mechanical testing of titanium/aluminum-silicon interface by push out. J. Mater. Sci. 43, 1749 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awan, G.H. and Hasan, F.U.: The morphology of coating/substrate interface in hot-dip-aluminized steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 472, 157 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhavan, S., Kamaraj, M., and Vijayaraghavan, L.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of cold metal transfer welded aluminum/dual phase steel. Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining 21, 194 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.A.: Iron containing intermetallic phases in Al–Si based casting. Procedia Mater. Sci. 1, 19 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backerud, L., Chai, G., and Tamminen, J.: Solidification Characteristics of Aluminum Alloys. Vol. 2: Foundry Alloys (AFS/Scanaluminium, Stockholm, Sweden, 1990).Google Scholar
Wei-Jen, C. and Chaur-Jeng, W.: Observation of high-temperature phase transformation in the Si-modified aluminide coating on mild steel using EBSD. Mater. Charact. 61, 467 (2010).Google Scholar
Springer, H., Kostka, A., Payton, E.J., Raabe, D., Kaysser-Pyzalla, A., and Eggeler, G.: On the formation and growth of intermetallic phases during interdiffusion between low-carbon steel and aluminum alloys. Acta Mater. 59, 1586 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahverdi, H.R., Ghomashchi, M.R., Shabestari, S.G., and Hejazi, J.: Microstructure analysis of interfacial reaction between molten aluminum and solid iron. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 124, 345 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W., Sun, D., Han, L., Gao, W., and Qiu, X.: Characterization of intermetallic compound in dissimilar material resistance spot welded joint of high strength steel and aluminum alloy. ISIJ Int. 51, 1870 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backerud, L., Krol, E., and Tamminen, J.: Solidification Characteristics of Aluminum Alloys. Vol. 1: Wrought Alloys (Skanaluminium/Universitetsforlaget AS, Stockholm, Sweden, 1986).Google Scholar
Backerud, L.: Kinetic aspects of the solidification of binary and ternary alloy systems. Jernkontorets Ann. 152, 109 (1968).Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Leng, X.S., Yang, T.H., and Yan, J.C.: Effect of Fe–Al intermetallic compounds on interfacial bonding of clad material. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 24, 279 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar